The relationship between the economic development of nations and the adoption of green initiatives by companies: a statistical study on 105 countries

  • Marek Ćwiklicki
  • Łukasz Jabłoński
  • Riccardo Sartori
  • Marius Dan Gavriletea
Article
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

The paper reports the results of a study whose purpose was to determine the correlations and potential directions of inter-dependence between economic development and green initiatives within national economies. The pilot study has included 105 countries with different levels of economic development, located in different continents and belonging to different integration groupings. The study was carried out by means of correlation coefficients computed between the indexes of the green initiatives implementation, and (a) the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita and (b) the GDP growth rate. The main result of the study is that the intensity of enterprises to implement green initiatives increases the levels of the internal economic development.

Keywords

Economic development Green initiatives GDP per capita Sustainable development 

References

  1. Achim, M.V., Pintea, M.O., Borlea, S.N.: Social and environmental performance-new dimension of performance in the context of sustainable development. Ovidius Univ. Ann. Econ. Sci. Ser. 11, 7–12 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. Aldrich, J.: Correlations genuine and spurious in Pearson and Yule. Stat. Sci. 10(4), 364–376 (1995).  https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177009870 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexandratos, N., Bruinsma, J.: World Agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. In: ESA Working Paper No. 12-03. Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy, p. 147 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. Anand, S., Sen, A.K.: Human development index: methodology and measurement, paper written in preparation for the 1994 human development report, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/oc12.pdf (1994)
  5. Babonea, A.M., Joia, R.M.: Transition to a green economy—a challenge and a solution for the world economy in multiple crisis context. Theor. Appl. Econ. J. 10, 90–101 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. Barna, F., Şeulean, V., Mura, P.O.: Insurance market trends caused by climate change. Theor. Appl. Econ. 5((558)(supplement)), 129–135 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. Beckerman, W.: Economic growth and the environment: whose growth? Whose environment? World Dev. 20(4), 481–496 (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(92)90038-W CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, T.: Race, gender and climate injustice: dimensions of social and environmental inequality. In: Godfrey, P., Torres, D. (eds.) Systemic Crises of Global Climate Change: Intersections of race, class and gender. Routledge, Abington (2016)Google Scholar
  9. Borys, T.: W poszukiwaniu syntetycznego wskaźnika zrównoważonego rozwoju’ [Looking for composite sustainable development indicator]. In: Poskrobko, B. (ed.) Obszary badań nad trwałym i zrównoważonym rozwojem, [Stable and Sustainable Development Research areas], pp. 271–292. Białystok, Wydawnictwo Ekonomia i Środowiska (2007)Google Scholar
  10. Costanza, R., Hart, M., Posner, S., Talberth, J., Beyond GDP: The Need for New Measures of Progress. The Pardee Papers. 4 January (2009)Google Scholar
  11. Ćwiklicki, M., Jabłoński, L.: Economic development and the implementation of CSR initiatives in national economies. In: O′Riordan, L., Zmuda, P., Heinemann, S. (eds.) Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility: Locating the Missing Link, pp. 147–168. FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, Essen (2015)Google Scholar
  12. Darrat, A.F., Al-Yousif, Y.K.: On the long-run relationship between population and economic growth: some time series evidence for developing countries. East. Econ. J. 25, 301–312 (1999)Google Scholar
  13. Dasgupta, P., Mäler, K.-G.: Net national product, wealth, and social well-being. Environ. Dev. Econ. 5(1–2), 69–93 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dickie, A., Streck, C., Roe, S., Zurek, M., Haupt F., Dolginow, A.: Strategies for Mitigating Climate Change in Agriculture: Abridged Report. Climate Focus and California Environmental Associates, prepared with the support of the Climate and Land Use Alliance (2014) Report and supplementary materials available at: www.agriculturalmitigation.org (2014)
  15. Dragos, C.M., Dragos, S.L., Ciumas, C.: Simulations for including the environmental tax in motor liability insurance. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 12, 331–336 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. Ehrlich, P., Holdren, J.: Impact of population growth. Science 171(3977), 1212–1217 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. European Environment Agency: Towards a green economy in Europe: EU environmental policy targets and objectives 2010–2050. European Environment Agency, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2013)Google Scholar
  18. Flamos, A., Van der Gaast, W., Doukas, H., Deng, G.: EU and Asian countries policies and programmes for the diffusion of sustainable energy technologies. Asia Europe J. 6, 261 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-008-0177-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frey, B.S., Stutzer, A.: What can economics learn from happiness research? J. Econ. Lit. 40(2), 402–435 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gelber, B.: Ben Franklin on Global Warming, The New York Times. (2009) http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/opinion/18gelber.html?_r=0
  21. Giannetti, B.F., Agostinho, F., Almeida, C.M.V.B., Huisingh, D.: A review of limitations of GDP and alternative indices to monitor human wellbeing and to manage eco-system functionality. J. Clean. Prod. 87, 11–25 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Green Economy Will Boost Jobs & Economic Growth: New Global Poll—UNEP (2012). http://www.unep.org/NEWSCENTRE/default.aspx?DocumentId=2688&ArticleId=9149
  23. Hirsch, F.: Social Limits to Growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hsu, C., Tan, K.C., Zailani, S.H.M., Jayaraman, V.: Supply chain drivers that foster the development of green initiatives in an emerging economy. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 33(6), 656–688 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IPCC: Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis. In: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  26. Jacobs, M.: Green Growth: Economic theory and political discourse, In: Working Paper No. 108. London, UK: Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy. (2012). http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/WP92-green-growth-economic-theory-political-discours
  27. Kang, K.H., Stein, L., Heo, C.Y., Lee, S.: Consumers’ willingness to pay for green initiatives of the hotel industry. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 31(2), 564–572 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kasztelan, A.: Green growth, green economy and sustainable development: terminological and relational discourse. Prague Econ. Pap. 26(4), 487–499 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klugman, J., Rodríguez, F., Choi, H.-J.: The HDI 2010: new controversies, old critiques. J. Econ. Inequal. 9(2), 249–288 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuznets, S.: National income and its composition 1919–1938. In: New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, Occasional Paper 2 (1941)Google Scholar
  31. Laukkonen, J., Blanco, K.P., Lenhart, J., Keiner, M., Cavric, B., Njenga, C.: Combining climate change adaptation and mitigation measures. Habitat Int. 33, 287–292 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lawn, P.A., Sanders, R.: Has Australia surpassed its optimal macroeconomic scale: finding out with aid of ‘benefit’ and ‘costs’ accounts and a sustainable net benefit index. Ecol. Econ. 28, 213–229 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lawn, P.A.: An assessment of the valuation methods used to calculate the index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW), genuine progress indicator (GPI), and sustainable net benefit index (SNBI). Environ. Dev. Sustain. 7, 185–208 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Low, L., Aw, T.C.: The human development index revisited. Singap. Manag. Rev. 19(1), 1–17 (1997)Google Scholar
  35. Mensah, M.A., Castro, C.L.: Sustainable resource use & sustainable development: a contradiction?!. Center for Development Research, University of Bonn, Bonn (2004)Google Scholar
  36. Ng, Y.-K.: From preference to happiness: towards a more complete welfare economics. Soc. Choice Welf. 20(2), 307–350 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nistor, A.I.: Are all financial crises the same? Premise for further research. Ann. Univ. Oradea Econ. Sci. Ser. 17(3), 395–398 (2008)Google Scholar
  38. OECD: Green Growth and Developing Countries. A Summary for Policy Makers. OECD, (2012) https://www.oecd.org/dac/50526354.pdf
  39. Overview of Selected Initiatives and Instruments Relevant to Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2008, 2009, Employment and Industrial Relations, OECDGoogle Scholar
  40. Păun, D.: Regional participation within european multi-level governance. Transylv. Rev. 24(1), 45–53 (2015)Google Scholar
  41. Păun, D.: Sustainability and financial performance of companies in the energy sector in Romania. Sustainability 9(10), 1722 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101722 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pearce, D.W., Markandya, A., Barbier, E.: Blueprint for a Green Economy, p. 192. Earthscan, London (1989)Google Scholar
  43. Pegou Sibe, J., Chiatchoua, C., Noel Megne, M. (2016): The long run relationship between population growth and economic growth: a panel data analysis of 30 of the most populated countries of the world. Análisis Económico 31(77), 205–218 (2016). http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/413/41345703009.pdf
  44. Pimentel, D., Houser, J., Preiss, E., White, O., Fang, H., Mesnick, L., Alpert, S.: Water resources: agriculture, the environment, and society. Bioscience 47(2), 97–106 (1997a).  https://doi.org/10.2307/1313020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pimentel, D., Huang, X., Cardova, A., Pimentel, M.: Impact of population growth on food supplies and environment. Popul. Environ. 19(1), 9–14 (1997b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pop, C.: The financial crisis of 2007–2008 a review of the timeline and of its causes. Journal Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai 2, 55–74 (2009)Google Scholar
  47. Portney, K.E.: Taking Sustainability Cities Seriously. Economic Development, the Environment, and Quality of Life in American Cities, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  48. Potts, J., Lynch, M., Wilkings, A., Huppe, G., Cunningham, M., Voora, V.: The state of sustainability initiatives review 2014. Standards and the green economy, IISD, London, pp. 353 (2014), https://www.iisd.org/pdf/2014/ssi_2014.pdf
  49. Puth, M.-T., Neuhӓuser, M., Ruxton, G.D.: Effective use of Pearson’s product—moment correlation coefficient. Anim. Behav. 93, 183–189 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Raisova, M., Durcova, J.: Economic growth-supply and demand perspective. Procedia Economics and Finance 15, 184–191 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rao, P., Holt, D.: Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 25(9), 898–916 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510613956 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Răchișan, R.P., Boța-Avram, C., Ivan, R., Groșanu, A.: Assessing the impact of corporate governance and economic development on environmental performance: empirical evidence from cross-country survey. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 16(3), 1194–1202 (2015)Google Scholar
  53. Răchișan, R.P., Boța-Avram, C., Groșanu, A.: Investor protection and country-level governance: cross-country empirical panel data evidence. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 30(1), 806–817 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Samuelson, P.A.: The evaluation of social income: capital formation and wealth. In: Lutz, F., Hague, D. (eds.) The Theory of Capital. St. Martin’s Press, New York (1961)Google Scholar
  55. Satbyul, K.E., Ho, K., Yeora, C.: A new approach to measuring green growth: application to the OECD and Korea. Futures 63, 37–48 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Scalco, A., Ceschi, A., Sartori, R.: The pursuit of happiness: a model of group formation. In: Jager, W., Verbrugge, R., Flache, A., de Roo, G., Hoogduin, L., Hemelrijk, C. (eds.) Advances in Social Simulation 2015. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 528, pp. 367–371. Springer, Cham (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sen, A.: Real national income. Rev. Econ. Stud. 43(1), 19–39 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sinding, S.W.: Population, poverty and economic development. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 364(1532), 3023–3030 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Slesnick, D.T.: Empirical approaches to the measurement of welfare. J. Econ. Lit. 36(4), 2108–2165 (1998)Google Scholar
  60. Sorrell, S.: Reducing energy demand: a review of issues, challenges and approaches. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 47, 74–82 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Standards Maps: International Trade Centre. (2015) http://www.standardsmap.org/
  62. Stojanović, I., Ateljević, J., Stevan Stević, R.: Good governance as a tool of sustainable development. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 5(4), 558–573 (2016)Google Scholar
  63. UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO): Global report on food crises 2017 (2017) http://www.refworld.org/docid/58e20dc64.html
  64. UN Secretary-General: Progress to date and remaining gaps in the implementation of the outcomes of the major summits in the area of sustainable development, as well as an analysis of the themes of the conference. Report for the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations (2010) https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/668prepcommittee.pdf
  65. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA): A Guidebook to the Green Economy. United Nations Division for Sustainable Development (2013) http://www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/528Green%20Economy%20Guidebook_100912_FINAL.pdf
  66. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA): A/RES/66/288—The Future We Want (2012) http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_66_288.pdf
  67. United Nations: Climate Change: Implications for the Energy Sector, Key Findings from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report (2014) https://www.worldenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Climate-Change-Implications-for-the-Energy-Sector-Summary-from-IPCC-AR5-2014-Full-report.pdf
  68. United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017) World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248 (2017) https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2017_KeyFindings.pdf
  69. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M.: The GDP paradox. J. Econ. Psychol. 30, 117–135 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. World Development Indicators (WDI): (2014) http://www.worldbank.org
  71. World Population Trends: (2017) http://www.unfpa.org/world-population-trends
  72. Zabel, G.: Peak people: the interrelationship between population growth and energy resources. Energy Bull. (2009). http://www.resilience.org/stories/2009-04-20/peak-people-interrelationship-between-population-growth-and-energy-resources/
  73. Zaharia, C., Suteu, D.: The natural resources and sustainable development. Cercetari agronomice in Moldova 44(1), 93–110 (2011)Google Scholar
  74. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Lai, K.: Initiatives and outcomes of green supply chain management implementation by Chinese manufacturers. J. Environ. Manag. 85(1), 179–189 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Economy and Public AdministrationCracow University of EconomicsCracowPoland
  2. 2.Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Commodity ScienceCracow University of EconomicsCracowPoland
  3. 3.Department of Human SciencesUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
  4. 4.Business Department, Faculty of BusinessBabes-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations