Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 143–181 | Cite as

Social network evolution in creative process of CNPD teams: a case study of Chinese companies

  • Wei ZhangEmail author
  • Yongli LiEmail author
  • Wenyao Zhang
  • Shengli Dai
Article
  • 119 Downloads

Abstract

The existing theories about how social networks affect creativity mostly focus on a certain stage in the organizational life of an idea, for instance, ideas generation, commercialization of ideas, and a previous assumption refers that multiple attributes of social networks of creative team are static. It is not possible to resolve such a realistic and important issue that how dynamic evolution of social networks affects the creative process at the fuzzy front-end of complex new product development (CNPD) of research and development (R&D) teams. This paper studies six R&D teams of CNPD from three new high-tech enterprises, in terms of network transaction content-heterogeneity/homogeneity of task knowledge, network relationship strength—weak tie/strong tie, and network structure—core–periphery as three major dimensions of social networks. It analyzes their dynamic evolution in the creative process and its influence on three sub-processes named idea generation, idea screening, and idea development. We find that in R&D teams network transaction content-heterogeneity of task knowledge, weak-tie network relationship, and discrete network structure are conducive to idea generation; homogeneity of task knowledge, strong-tie network relationship, and centralized network structure are good for idea screening; homogeneity of task knowledge in the network is maintained while new knowledge is obtained actively from the outside; internal network relationship is dominated by strong tie while weak tie is connected with the outside; both diffused and balanced network structures are beneficial to idea development.

Keywords

Social network Knowledge heterogeneity Ties Core–periphery Creative process Complex new product development 

References

  1. Amabile, T.M.: A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Staw, B.M., Cummings, L.L. (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 10, pp. 123–167. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT (1988)Google Scholar
  2. Amabile, T.M.: Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Harvard Business School, Boston (1996)Google Scholar
  3. Anand, N., Gardner, H.K., Morris, T.: Knowledge-based innovation: emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. Acad. Manag. J. 50(2), 406–428 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. Ancona, D.G., Caldwell, D.F.: Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. 3(3), 321–341 (1992)Google Scholar
  5. Andrews, J., Smith, D.C.: In search of the marketing imagination: factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. J. Mark. Res. 33(2), 174–187 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. Barczak, G., Griffin, A., Kahn, K.B.: Perspective: trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 26(1), 3–23 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. Basadur, M., Graen, G.B., Green, S.G.: Training in creative problem solving: effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 30(1), 41–70 (1982)Google Scholar
  8. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G.: Models of core/periphery structures. Soc. Netw. 21(4), 375–395 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. Braha, D., Bar-Yam, Y.: The statistical mechanics of complex product development: empirical and analytical results. Manag. Sci. 53(7), 1127–1145 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. Cattani, G., Ferriani, S.: A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organ. Sci. 19(6), 824–844 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. Chen, M.H., Chang, Y.C., Hung, S.C.: Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams. R&d Manag. 38(1), 21–34 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J.: Major new products: what distinguishes the winners in the chemical industry? J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 10(2), 90–111 (1993)Google Scholar
  13. Darr, E.D., Kurtzberg, T.R.: 2000 An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 82 (1), 28–44 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. Diehl, M., Stroebe, W.: Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53(3), 497 (1987)Google Scholar
  15. Drazin, R., Glynn, M.A., Kazanjian, R.K.: Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: a sensemaking perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24(2), 286–307 (1999)Google Scholar
  16. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532–550 (1989)Google Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Better stories and better constructs: the case for rigor and comparative logic. Acad. Manag. Rev. 16(3), 620–627 (1991)Google Scholar
  18. Eisenhardt, K.M., Bourgeois, L.J.: Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: toward a midrange theory. Acad. Manag. J. 31(4), 737–770 (1988)Google Scholar
  19. Elam, J.J., Mead, M.: Can software influence creativity? Inf. Syst. Res. 1(1), 1–22 (1990)Google Scholar
  20. Elsbach, K.D., Kramer, R.M.: Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Acad. Manag. J. 46(3), 283–301 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. Friedmann, J.: Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1966)Google Scholar
  22. Garfield, M.J., Taylor, N.J., Dennis, A.R., Satzinger, J.W.: Research report: modifying paradigms—individual differences, creativity techniques, and exposure to ideas in group idea generation. Inf. Syst. Res. 12(3), 322–333 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B.: Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. Eur. Manag. Rev. 2(3), 179–197 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. Glynn, M.A.: Innovative genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 21(4), 1081–1111 (1996)Google Scholar
  25. Golden, B.R.: Research notes. The past is the past—or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Acad. Manag. J. 35(4), 848–860 (1992)Google Scholar
  26. Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78, 1360–1380 (1973)Google Scholar
  27. Granovetter, M.: The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociol. Theory 1(1), 201–233 (1983)Google Scholar
  28. Hansen, M.T., Mors, M.L., Løvås, B.: Knowledge sharing in organizations: multiple networks, multiple phases. Acad. Manag. J. 48(5), 776–793 (2005)Google Scholar
  29. Hemlin, S.: Creative knowledge environments for research groups in biotechnology. The influence of leadership and organizational support in universities and business companies. Scientometrics 67(1), 121–142 (2006)Google Scholar
  30. Hobday, M., Rush, H., Tidd, J.: Innovation in complex products and system. Res. Policy 29(7), 793–804 (2000)Google Scholar
  31. Ibarra, H., Andrews, S.B.: Power, social influence, and sense making: effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Adm. Sci. Q. 38(2), 277–303 (1993)Google Scholar
  32. Inkpen, A.C., Tsang, E.W.: Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad. Manag. Rev. 30(1), 146–165 (2005)Google Scholar
  33. Jick, T.D.: Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm. Sci. Q. 24(4), 602–611 (1979)Google Scholar
  34. Kahn, W.A.: Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Manag. J. 33(4), 692–724 (1990)Google Scholar
  35. Khurana, A., Rosenthal, S.R.: Towards holistic “front ends” in new product development. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 15(1), 57–74 (1998)Google Scholar
  36. Kijkuit, B., Van Den Ende, J.: The organizational life of an idea: integrating social network, creativity and decision-making perspectives. J. Manag. Stud. 44(6), 863–882 (2007)Google Scholar
  37. Kim, J., Wilemon, D.: Focusing the fuzzy front-end in new product development. R&D Manag. 32(4), 269–279 (2002)Google Scholar
  38. Klein, K.J., Lim, B., Saltz, J.L., Mayer, D.M.: How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Acad. Manag. J. 47(6), 952–963 (2004)Google Scholar
  39. Kratzer, J., Leenders, O.T.A.J., Engelen, J.M.L.: Stimulating the potential: creative performance and communication in innovation teams. Creat. Innov. Manag. 13(1), 63–71 (2004)Google Scholar
  40. Kratzer, J., Leenders, R.T.A., Van Engelen, J.M.: The social network among engineering design teams and their creativity: a case study among teams in two product development programs. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 28(5), 428–436 (2010)Google Scholar
  41. Kumar, N., Stern, L.W., Anderson, J.C.: Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Acad. Manag. J. 36(6), 1633–1651 (1993)Google Scholar
  42. Leenders, R.T.A., Van Engelen, J.M., Kratzer, J.: Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 20(1), 69–92 (2003)Google Scholar
  43. Lubart, T.I.: Models of the creative process: past, present and future. Creat. Res. J. 13(3–4), 295–308 (2001)Google Scholar
  44. MacCrimmon, K.R., Wagner, C.: Stimulating ideas through creative software. Manag. Sci. 40(11), 1514–1532 (1994)Google Scholar
  45. Marsden, P.V.: Network data and measurement. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 16(16), 435–463 (1990)Google Scholar
  46. Martin, J.A., Eisenhardt, K.M.: Rewiring: cross-business-unit collaborations in multibusiness organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 53(2), 265–301 (2010)Google Scholar
  47. Miller, C.C., Cardinal, L.B., Glick, W.H.: Retrospective reports in organizational research: a reexamination of recent evidence. Acad. Manag. J. 40(1), 189–204 (1997)Google Scholar
  48. Moenaert, R.K., De Meyer, A., Souder, W.E., Deschoolmeester, D.: R&D/marketing communication during the fuzzy front-end. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 42(3), 243–258 (1995)Google Scholar
  49. Moorman, C., Miner, A.S.: The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. J. Mark. Res. 34(1), 91–106 (1997)Google Scholar
  50. Nagasundaram, M., Dennis, A.R.: When a group is not a group: the cognitive foundation of group idea generation. Small Group Res. 24(4), 463–489 (1993)Google Scholar
  51. Ozcan, P., Eisenhardt, K.M.: Origin of alliance portfolios: entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Acad. Manag. J. 52(2), 246–279 (2009)Google Scholar
  52. Perry-Smith, J.E.: Social yet creative: the role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Manag. J. 49(1), 85–101 (2006)Google Scholar
  53. Perry-Smith, J.E., Shalley, C.E.: The social side of creativity: a static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 28(1), 89–106 (2003)Google Scholar
  54. Pettigrew, A.M.: Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organ. Sci. 1(3), 267–292 (1990)Google Scholar
  55. Reagans, R., McEvily, B.: Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Adm. Sci. Q. 48(2), 240–267 (2003)Google Scholar
  56. Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E.W.: Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. 12(4), 502–517 (2001)Google Scholar
  57. Reid, S.E., De Brentani, U.: The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: a theoretical model. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 21(3), 170–184 (2004)Google Scholar
  58. Rodan, S., Galunic, C.: More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strateg. Manag. J. 25(6), 541–562 (2004)Google Scholar
  59. Sammarra, A., Biggiero, L.: Heterogeneity and specificity of inter-firm knowledge flows in innovation networks. J. Manag. Stud. 45(4), 800–829 (2008)Google Scholar
  60. Shalley, C.E., Zhou, J., Oldham, G.R.: The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here? J. Manag. 30(6), 933–958 (2004)Google Scholar
  61. Simonton, D.K.: Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46(6), 1273 (1984)Google Scholar
  62. Smith, P.G., Reinertsen, D.G.: Developing Products in Half the Time. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  63. Stevens, G.A., Burley, J.: 3,000 raw ideas = 1 commercial success. Res. Technol. Manag. 40(3), 16–27 (1997)Google Scholar
  64. Sutton, R.I., Callahan, A.L.: The stigma of bankruptcy: spoiled organizational image and its management. Acad. Manag. J. 30(3), 405–436 (1987)Google Scholar
  65. Sutton, R.I., Hargadon, A.: Brainstorming groups in context: effectiveness in a product design firm. Adm. Sci. Q. 41(4), 685–718 (1996)Google Scholar
  66. Tichy, N.M., Tushman, M.L., Fombrun, C.: Social network analysis for organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 4(4), 507–519 (1979)Google Scholar
  67. Verworn, B., Herstatt, C., Nagahira, A.: The fuzzy front end of Japanese new product development projects: impact on success and differences between incremental and radical projects. R&d Manag. 38(1), 1–19 (2008)Google Scholar
  68. Watson, W.E., Kumar, K., Michaelsen, L.K.: Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad. Manag. J. 36(3), 590–602 (1993)Google Scholar
  69. Weick, K.E.: Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995)Google Scholar
  70. Wiersema, M.F., Bantel, K.A.: Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Manag. J. 35 (1), 91–121 (1992)Google Scholar
  71. Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E., Griffin, R.W.: Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Manag. Rev. 18(2), 293–321 (1993)Google Scholar
  72. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)Google Scholar
  73. Zhang, W., Zhang, Q.: Multi-stage evaluation and selection in the formation process of complex creative solution. Qual. Quant. 48(5), 2375–2404 (2014)Google Scholar
  74. Zhang, W., Zhang, Q., Song, M.: How do individual-level factors affect the creative solution formation process of teams? Creat. Innov. Manag. 24(3), 508–524 (2015)Google Scholar
  75. Zhou, J., Shin, S.J., Brass, D.J., Choi, J., Zhang, Z.: Social networks, personal values, and creativity: evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. J. Appl. Psychol. 94(6), 1544 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Policy and ManagementCentral China Normal UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Business AdministrationNortheastern UniversityShengyangPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.School of ManagementHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.School of Public Policy and ManagementCentral China Normal UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations