Quality & Quantity

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

New forms of citizen participation using SNS: an empirical approach

  • Yeon-Tae ChoiEmail author
  • Gyeong-Hoan Kwon


This study empirically examined whether the use of social networking sites (SNSs) for political purposes would encourage personalized and informal modes of participation more strongly than traditional and institutional modes of participation. Multiple regression analysis was applied to data collected from a nationwide online survey conducted among Nielson Korean Click panel members in September 2015. The study found that SNS use for political purposes strengthened individualized and informal forms of citizen participation—such as online volunteering, offline political participation, involvement in informal civic organizations, and participation in conventional political organizations—rather than traditional and formal forms, including voting. This finding suggests that the development of information and communication technology has helped citizens, especially those who feel alienated in a representative democracy, to participate in a more direct and interactive manner through informal and everyday communication channels, such as SNS, as opposed to participating in a formal and sporadic manner through conventional communication channels.


SNS Citizen participation Mobilization effect Individual and networked politics DIY citizenship 



This research was supported by the Kyungnam University Foundation under Grant No. 2014.


  1. Bang, H.: Everyday makers and expert citizens: building political not social capital. In: Newman, J. (ed.) Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere, pp. 159–179. Policy Press, Bristol (2005)Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, L.: The personalization of politics: political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 644(1), 20–39 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, L., Breunig, C., Givens, T.: Communication and political mobilization: digital media and the organization of anti-Iraq War demonstrations in the US. Polit. Commun. 25(3), 269–289 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. Bimber, B., Copeland, L.: Digital media and traditional political participation overtime. J. Inf. Technol. Polit. 10(3), 125–137 (2013). Google Scholar
  5. Bimber, B., Davis, R.: Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections. Oxford University Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  6. Bonchek, M.: From Broadcast to Netcast: The Internet and the Flow of Political Information. PhD thesis, Harvard University (1997)Google Scholar
  7. Bond, R., Faris, C., Jone, J., Kramer, A., Marlow, C., Settle, J., Fowler, J.: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nat. Int. Wkly. J. Sci. 489, 295–298 (2012). Accessed 2 Feb 2018
  8. Brewer, G.: Building social capital: civic attitudes and behavior of public servants. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 13(1), 5–26 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. Dahlgren, P.: The internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation. Polit. Commun. 22(2), 147–162 (2005). Google Scholar
  10. Dalton, R.: Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 4th edn. CQ Press, Washington, DC (2006)Google Scholar
  11. Dalton, R.: Citizenship norms and political participation in America: the good news is…the bad news is wrong. Paper presented at the conference on citizenship, involvement and democracy. Georgetown University, Washington, DC (2005)Google Scholar
  12. Di Gennaro, C., Dutton, W.: The Internet and the public: online and offline political participation in the United Kingdom. Parliam. Aff. 59(2), 299–313 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: The benefits of Facebook “friends”: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J. Comput. Med. Commun. 12(4), 1143–1168 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. Enjolras, B., Steen-Johnsen, K., Wollebæk, D.: Social media and mobilization to offline demonstrations: transcending participatory divides? N. Media Soc. 15(6), 890–908 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., Valenzuela, S.: Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement, and political participation. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 17(3), 319–336 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Copeland, L., Bimber, B.: Political consumerism: civic engagement and the social media connection. N. Media Soc. 16(3), 488–506 (2014a)Google Scholar
  17. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., Zheng, P.: Social media, political expression, and political participation: panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. J. Commun. 64, 612–634 (2014b)Google Scholar
  18. Hayes, D.: Has television personalized voting behavior? Polit. Behav. 31(2), 231–260 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. Hooghe, M.: Why should we be bowling alone? Cross-sectional results from a Belgian survey on civic participation. Volunt. Int. J. Volunt. Nonprofit Organ. 14(1), 41–59 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. Hooghe, M., Dejaeghere, Y.: Does the “monitorial citizen” exist? An empirical investigation into the occurrence of postmodern forms of citizenship in the Nordic countries. Scand. Polit. Stud. 30(2), 249–271 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. Howard, P., Duffy, A., Freelon, D., Hussain, M., Mari, W., Mazaid, M.: Opening closed regimes: what was the role of social media during the Arab Spring? PIPTI. Accessed 27 Sept 2017
  22. Hustinx, L., Lammertyn, F.: Collective and reflexive styles of volunteering: a sociological modernization perspective. Volunt. Int. J. Volunt. Nonprofit Organ. 14(2), 167–187 (2003)Google Scholar
  23. Inglehart, R.: Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1997)Google Scholar
  24. Inglehart, R., Welzel, C.: Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, T., Kaye, B.: For whom the web toils: how internet experience predicts web reliance and credibility. Atl. J. Commun. 12(1), 19–45 (2004)Google Scholar
  26. Kaase, M.: Interpersonal trust, political trust and non-institutionalized political participation in Western Europe. West Eur. Polit. 22(3), 1–21 (1999)Google Scholar
  27. Kim, E.: A comparative study on social media use and public participation in Korea and the United States: does social media matter? Korean J. Policy Stud. 30(1), 207–230 (2015)Google Scholar
  28. Li, Y., Marsh, D.: New forms of political participation: searching for expert citizens and everyday makers. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 38, 247–272 (2008)Google Scholar
  29. McManimon, S.: Political engagement and the shifting paradigm from traditional to social media. PhD thesis, Indiana University of Pennsylvania. (2015). Accessed 2 Feb 2018
  30. Nam, T.: Dual effects of the internet on political activism: reinforcing and mobilizing. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 590–597 (2012)Google Scholar
  31. Niemi, R., Craig, S., Mattei, F.: Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election study. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 85(4), 1407–1413 (1991)Google Scholar
  32. Norris, P. (ed.): Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  33. Norris, P., Krook, M.: One of US: Multilevel Models Examining the Impact of Descriptive Representation on Civic Engagement. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  34. Norris, P.: Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (2001)
  35. O’Toole, T., Lister, M., Marsh, D., Jones, S., McDonagh, A.: Tuning out or left out? Participation and non-participation among young people. Contemp. Polit. 9(1), 45–61 (2003)Google Scholar
  36. Park, S., Choi, Y., Hwang, D., Paek, M.: Do different types of SNS have different impacts on participatory social capital? In: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective and Electronic Democracy, and Proceedings of the 2012 Joint International Conference on Advancing Democracy, Government and Governance, Vienna, Austria, 3–6 Sept 2012, pp. 231–241Google Scholar
  37. Putnam, R.: Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  38. Ratto, M., Boler, M. (eds.): DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media. MIT Press, Boston (2014)Google Scholar
  39. Robertson, S., Vatrapu, R., Medina, R.: Online video “friends” social networking: overlapping online public spheres in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. J. Inf. Technol. Polit. 7(2/3), 182–201 (2010)Google Scholar
  40. Scheufele, D., Shah, D.: Personality strength and social capital: the role of dispositional and informational variables in the production of civic participation. Commun. Res. 27(2), 107–131 (2000)Google Scholar
  41. Schlozman, K.L., Verba, S., Brady, H.: Weapon of the strong? Participatory inequality and the Internet. Perspect. Polit. 8(2), 487–509 (2010)Google Scholar
  42. Schudson, M.: The Good Citizen: A History of American Public Life. Free Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  43. Skocpol, T.: Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman (2003)Google Scholar
  44. Stark, B., Lunt, P.: An introduction to public voice and mediated participation. Commun. 37(3), 225–231 (2012). Accessed 2 Feb 2018
  45. Stolle, D., Hooghe, M.: Inaccurate, exceptional, one-sided or irrelevant? The debate about the alleged decline of social capital and civic engagement in Western societies. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 35, 149–167 (2005)Google Scholar
  46. Stolle, D., Micheletti, S.: Political Consumerism: Global Responsibility in Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  47. Taylor, J.K., Clerkin, R.: Public service motivation and political action in college undergraduates. Polit. Policy 39(5), 715–740 (2011)Google Scholar
  48. Valenzuela, S., Park, N., Kee, K.: Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 14(4), 875–901 (2009)Google Scholar
  49. Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., Gil de Zúñiga, H.: Social networks that matter: exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 24(2), 163–184 (2011)Google Scholar
  50. Verba, S., Nie, N.: Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Harper and Row, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  51. Vissers, S., Stolle, D.: The Internet and new modes of political participation: online versus offline participation. Inf. Commun. Soc. 17(8), 937–955 (2014)Google Scholar
  52. Westling, M.: Expanding the public sphere: the impact of Facebook on political communication. Society 28(3), 835–860 (2007)Google Scholar
  53. Winneg, K.: Online political participation in the 2008 U.S. presidential election: mobilizing or reinforcing? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (2009)Google Scholar
  54. Yang, H., DeHart, J.: Social media use and online political participation among college students during the US election 2012. Soc. Media Soc. 2(1), 1–18 (2016)Google Scholar
  55. Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., Delli Carpini, M.: A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public AdministrationKyungnam UniversityChangwon-siRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations