Advertisement

Gender invariance of dignity in non-terminal elderly patients with chronic diseases: a multicentric study

  • Fabio Ferretti
  • Andrea PozzaEmail author
  • Maurilio Pallassini
  • Lorenzo Righi
  • Fulvia Marini
  • Sabrina Adami
  • Anna Coluccia
Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

The Dignity construct, originally developed in end-of-life care, includes perceptions, cognitions and emotions related to the quality of being worthy of esteem or respect. The Patient Dignity Inventory is a self-report questionnaire developed to measure this construct. There is a lack of research on the construct in populations with chronic diseases, where Dignity may be expected to be impaired due to the associated changes in life. In addition, gender invariance of the construct has not been investigated yet. The current study investigated the single-dimension structure of the PDI in non-terminal elderly patients with different chronic diseases. A multicentric study at general hospitals included 421 elderly patients with chronic respiratory, renal or heart failure, stroke and oncological pathology in the initial phase of chemotherapeutic treatment. The dimensionality of the PDI was assessed by structural equation models and gender invariance by multigroup analysis. A single-dimension model optimized based on the Modification Indices showed excellent reliability and good fit. The inclusion of covariances between residuals of some items improved the model fit and suggested content overlap between some items which was interpreted considering the specific characteristics of chronic patients. The Dignity construct resulted invariant in relation to gender. Dignity in care appears to be an unitary construct also in chronic diseases. Future research should include also other types of chronicity and might assess further item fit through Item Response Theory analysis.

Keywords

Dignity Chronic illness Gender Quality of life Dimensionality Values 

Notes

References

  1. Abdel-Kader, K., Unruh, M.L., Weisbord, S.D.: Symptom burden, depression, and quality of life in chronic and end-stage kidney disease. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4, 1057–1064 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albers, G., Pasman, H.R.W., Rurup, M.L., de Vet, H.C., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D.: Analysis of the construct of dignity and content validity of the patient dignity inventory. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 45, 9 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. Baillie, L.: Mixed-sex wards and patient dignity: nurses’ and patients’ perspectives. Br. J. Nurs. 17, 1220–1225 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagheri, H., Yaghmaei, F., Ashktorab, T., Zayeri, F.: Relationship between illness-related worries and social dignity in patients with heart failure. Nurs. Ethics 25, 618–627 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler, P.M.: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107, 238–246 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentler, P.M., Bonett, D.G.: Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88, 588–606 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boehmer, A., Audet, C.M., Blevins, M., Gebi, U.I., Wester, C.W., Vermund, S.H., Aliyu, M.H.: Patient and provider satisfaction with a comprehensive strategy to improve prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission services in rural Nigeria. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 72, S117 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borhani, F., Abbaszadeh, A., Moosavi, S.: Status of human dignity of adult patients admitted to hospitals of Tehran. J. Med. Ethics Hist. 7, 20 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. Byrne, B.M.: Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. Int. J. Test. 1, 55–86 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carta, M.G., Patten, S., Nardi, A.E., Bhugra, D.: Mental health and chronic diseases: a challenge to be faced from a new perspective. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 29, 373–376 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chochinov, H.M.: Dignity-conserving care-a new model for palliative care: helping the patient feel valued. JAMA 287, 2253–2260 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chochinov, H.M.: Dignity and the eye of the beholder. J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 1336–1340 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chochinov, H.M.: Dignity and the essence of medicine: the A, B, C and D of dignity conserving care. BMJ 335, 184–187 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chochinov, H.M., Hack, T., McClement, S., Kristjanson, L., Harlos, M.: Dignity in the terminally ill: a developing empirical model. Soc. Sci. Med. 54, 433–443 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chochinov, H.M., Hassard, T., McClement, S., Hack, T., Kristjanson, L.J., Harlos, M., Sinclair, S., Murray, A.: The patient dignity inventory: a novel way of measuring dignity-related distress in palliative care. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 36, 559–571 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chochinov, H.M., Johnston, W., McClement, S.E., Hack, T.F., Dufault, B., Enns, M., Thompson, G., Harlos, M., Damant, R.W., Ramsey, C.D., Davison, S., Zacharias, J., Milke, D., Strang, D., Campbell-Enns, H.J., Kredentser, M.S.: Dignity and distress towards the end of life across four non-cancer populations. PLoS One 11, e0147607 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coluccia, A., Fagiolini, A., Ferretti, F., Pozza, A., Costoloni, G., Bolognesi, S., Goracci, A.: Adult obsessive-compulsive disorder and quality of life outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J. Psychiatry 22, 41–52 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coluccia, A., Ferretti, F., Fagiolini, A., Pozza, A.: Psychometric properties and relations with coping and family strain of the Health Services and Caregiver Experience questionnaire (HSCE): an outcome measure of informal caregivers’ experience for inpatient care in Italy. BMC Health Serv. Res. 17, 494 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denton, M., Prus, S., Walters, V.: Gender differences in health: a Canadian study of the psychosocial, structural and behavioural determinants of health. Soc. Sci. Med. 58, 2585–2600 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Di Lorenzo, R., Cabri, G., Carretti, E., Galli, G., Giambalvo, N., Rioli, G.: A preliminary study of patient dignity inventory validation among patients hospitalized in an acute psychiatric ward. Neuropsych. Dis. Treat. 13, 177–190 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Di Marco, F., Verga, M., Reggente, M., Casanova, F.M., Santus, P., Blasi, F., Centanni, S.: Anxiety and depression in COPD patients: the roles of gender and disease severity. Respir. Med. 100, 1767–1774 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eriksen, B.O., Ingebretsen, O.C.: The progression of chronic kidney disease: a 10-year population-based study of the effects of gender and age. Kidney Int. 69, 375–382 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fleischmann, M., Carr, E., Xue, B., Zaninotto, P., Stansfeld, S.A., Stafford, M., Head, J.: Changes in autonomy, job demands and working hours after diagnosis of chronic disease: a comparison of employed and self-employed older persons using the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). J. Epidemiol. Community Health 72, 1–7 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ganzini, L., Nelson, H.D., Schmidt, T.A., Kraemer, D.F., Delorit, M.A., Lee, M.A.: Physicians’ experiences with the Oregon death with dignity act. N. Engl. J. Med. 342, 557–563 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gore, J.M., Brophy, C.J., Greenstone, M.A.: How well do we care for patients with end stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)? A comparison of palliative care and quality of life in COPD and lung cancer. Thorax 55, 1000–1006 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grassi, L., Costantini, A., Caruso, R., Brunetti, S., Marchetti, P.: Dignity and psychosocial-related variables in advanced and non advanced cancer patients by using the patient dignity inventory-Italian version. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 53, 279–287 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gueldner, S.H.: Preserving dignity and sense of worth in older adults. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 38, 55–56 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guo, Q., Jacelon, C.S.: An integrative review of dignity in end-of-life care. Palliat. Med. 28, 931–940 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, S., Chochinov, H., Harding, R., Murray, S., Richardson, A., Higginson, I.J.: A phase II randomised controlled trial assessing the feasibility, acceptability and potential effectiveness of dignity therapy for older people in care homes: study protocol. BMC Geriatr 9, 9 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harries, M.: Dignity. Nurs. Older People 24, 12 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hu, L.T., Bentler, P.M.: Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Modeling 6, 56–83 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnston, B., Lawton, S., McCaw, C., Law, E., Murray, J., Gibb, J., Pringle, J., Munro, G., Rodriguez, C.: Living well with dementia: enhancing dignity and quality of life, using a novel intervention, Dignity Therapy. Int. J. Older People Nurs. 11, 107–120 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jöreskog, K., Sörbom, D.: LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide. Scientific Software International Inc, Chicago (1996)Google Scholar
  34. Jöreskog, K., Sörbom, D., Du Toit, S., Du Toit, M.: LISREL 8: New Statistical Features. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood (2000)Google Scholar
  35. Kitson, A.L., Dow, C., Calabrese, J.D., Locock, L., Athlin, Å.M.: Stroke survivors’ experiences of the fundamentals of care: a qualitative analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 50, 392–403 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kline, P.: An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. Routledge, Abingdon (1994)Google Scholar
  37. Loehlin, J.: Latent Variable models: An Introduction to Factor, Path and Structural Equation Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah (2004)Google Scholar
  38. Macklin, R.: Dignity is a useless concept: it means no more than respect for persons or their autonomy. BMJ 327, 1419–1420 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Magallares, A., Graffigna, G., Barello, S., Bonanomi, A., Lozza, E.: Spanish adaptation of the Patient Health Engagement scale (S. PHE-s) in patients with chronic diseases. Psicothema 29, 408–413 (2017)Google Scholar
  40. Murata, H.: Spiritual pain and its care in patients with terminal cancer: construction of a conceptual framework by philosophical approach. Palliat. Support. Care 1, 15–21 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nunnally, J., Bernstein, I.: Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  42. Orfila, F., Ferrer, M., Lamarca, R., Tebe, C., Domingo-Salvany, A., Alonso, J.: Gender differences in health-related quality of life among the elderly: the role of objective functional capacity and chronic conditions. Soc. Sci. Med. 63, 2367–2380 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peate, I.: Dignity and geriatrics. Br. J. Hosp. Med. 73, 354 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rafferty, K.A., Billig, A.K., Mosack, K.E.: Spirituality, religion, and health: the role of communication, appraisals, and coping for individuals living with chronic illness. J. Relig. Health 54, 1870–1885 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Redondo-Sendino, Á., Guallar-Castillón, P., Banegas, J.R., Rodríguez-Artalejo, F.: Gender differences in the utilization of health-care services among the older adult population of Spain. BMC Public Health 6, 155 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Remen, R.N.: The power of words: how the labels we give patients can limit their lives. West. J. Med. 175, 353–354 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ripamonti, C.I., Buonaccorso, L., Maruelli, A., Bandieri, E., Pessi, M.A., Boldini, S., Primi, C., Miccinesi, G.: Patient dignity inventory (PDI) questionnaire: the validation study in Italian patients with solid and hematological cancers on active oncological treatments. Tumori 98, 491–500 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rullán, M., Carvajal, A., Núñez-Córdoba, J.M., Martínez, M., Carrasco, J.M., García, I., Arantzamendi, M., Centeno, C.: Spanish version of the patient dignity inventory: translation and validation in patients with advanced cancer. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 50, 874–881 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sautier, L.P., Vehling, S., Mehnert, A.: Assessment of patients’ dignity in cancer care: preliminary psychometrics of the German version of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-G). J. Pain Symptom Manage. 47, 181–188 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schram, M.T., Baan, C.A., Pouwer, F.: Depression and quality of life in patients with diabetes: a systematic review from the European depression in diabetes (EDID) research consortium. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 5, 112–119 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Solomon, B.K., Wilson, K.G., Henderson, P.R., Poulin, P.A., Kowal, J., McKim, D.A.: Loss of dignity in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 51, 529–537 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Soni, R.K., Weisbord, S.D., Unruh, M.L.: Health-related quality of life outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 19, 153–159 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steiger, J.H.: Structural model evaluation and modification. Multivar. Behav. Res. 25, 173–180 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stevens, J.: Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, Mahwah (1996)Google Scholar
  55. Street, A.F., Kissane, D.W.: Constructions of dignity in end-of-life care. J. Palliat. Care 17, 93–101 (2001)Google Scholar
  56. Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., Wainer, H.: Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. In: Holland, P.W., Wainer, H. (eds.) differential item functioning, pp. 67–113. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1993)Google Scholar
  57. Van Gennip, I.E., Pasman, H.R.W., Oosterveld-Vlug, M.G., Willems, D.L., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D.: Dynamics in the sense of dignity over the course of illness: a longirudinal study into the perspective of serious ill patients. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 52, 1694–1704 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Webster, C., Bryan, K.: Older people’s views of dignity and how it can be promoted in a hospital environment. J. Clin. Nurs. 18, 1784–1792 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wheaton, B., Muthén, B., Alwin, D.F., Summers, G.F.: Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In: Heise, D.R. (ed.) Sociological Methodology, pp. 84–136. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1977)Google Scholar
  60. WHO: Global Status Report on Non-communicable Diseases 2010. World Health Organization, Geneva (2011)Google Scholar
  61. WHO: Noncommunicable Diseases (2016). http://www.who.int/topics/noncommunicable_diseases/en/. Accessed 13 Sept. 2018
  62. Wilson, K.G., Curran, D., McPherson, C.J.: A burden to others: a common source of distress for the terminally ill. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 34, 115–123 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. World Medical Association: World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310, 2191–2194 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wyld, M., Morton, R.L., Hayen, A., Howard, K., Webster, A.C.: A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments. PLOS Med. 9, e1001307 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Santa Maria alle Scotte University Hospital of SienaSienaItaly
  2. 2.Azienda USL SudestGrossetoItaly
  3. 3.Santa Maria della Misericordia University HospitalPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations