Quality & Quantity

, Volume 52, Supplement 2, pp 929–943 | Cite as

Determination of teachers’ perspectives and level of readiness towards MOOCs for tolerance education

  • Ahmet ArnavutEmail author
  • Hüseyin Bicen


New opportunities are now provided in individual’s lives due to the development of technology. This has led to changes in educational environments as well as technology, which has removed barriers to participation due to the novelty that it presents for teacher and the learners at the same time. The Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) environment is the best example of this phenomenon where advanced technology is at the forefront and it is an extension of distance learning. By eliminating barriers such as place, time, background and infrastructure, the Massive Online Open Courses act as a guide for lifelong learning and enables learners to achieve rapid development on the, paving the way for learners to obtain certificates and diplomas at their own convenience, provided they have an Internet connection. The aim of this study is to improve a scale that is related to the determination of the teachers’ perspectives and the level of readiness towards traditional Massive Open Online Courses. Also, it will guide people who study in the MOOC field and provide them with future direction.


Mooc Tolerance Open Adult Digital Distance learning 



We would like to present our great thanks to all participants who saved their precious time, answered questions and filled in the scales. Also, great thanks to the expert people of the field for their valuable opinions and criticisms.


  1. Altinay, F., Dagli, G., Altinay, Z.: Role of technology and management in tolerance and reconciliation education. Qual. Quant. 1–12 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. Arnavut, A., Özdamlı, F.: Ecamination of studies on technology-assisted collaboraitetive learning published between 2010–2014. Cypriot J. Educ. Sci. Sci. 11(3), 119–125 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. Cormier, D., Siemens, G.: Through the open door: Open courses as research, learning, and engagement. Educause. 45(4), 30–39 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. Durak, G.: The effects of a distance education programming language course on student performance. J. Theory Pract. Educ. 10(1), 202–219 (2014).
  5. Barak, M., Watted, A., Haick, H.: Computers and education motivation to learn in massive open online courses: examining aspects of language and social engagement. Comput. Educ. 94, 49–60 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barış, M.F.: Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Uzaktan Öğretime Yönelik Tutumlarının İncelenmesi: Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Örneği. Sakarya Univ. J. Educ. 5(2), 36–46 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartolome, A., Steffens, K.: Are MOOCs promising learning environments? Comunicar 22(44), 91–99 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berners-lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Sci. Am. 284(5), 28–37 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. Bhat, M.: Modern trends in education different. Indıan J. Appl. Res. 6(1), 571–573 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. Bicen, H., Arnavut, A.: Determining the effects of technological tool use habits on social lives. Comput. Hum. Behav. 48, 457–462 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bozkurt, A.: Kitlesel Açık Çevrimiçi Dersler (Massive Open Online Courses—MOOCs) ve sayısal bilgi çağında yaşamboyu öğrenme fırsatı. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 1, 56–81 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. Bozkurt, A., Keskin, N.O., Waard, I.De.: Research trends in massive open online course (MOOC) theses and dissertations: surfing the Tsunami wave. Open Praxis 8(3), 203–221 (2016). doi: 10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Büyüköztürk, Ş.: Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 1–213 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. Chea, C.C.: Benefits and challenges. Asean J. Open Distance Learn. 8(1), 16–23 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. Cisel, M., Mano, M., Bachelet, R., Silberzahn, P.: A tale of two MOOCs: analyzing long-term course dynamics. Proceedings papers, pp. 191 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. Da Silva, A. G., Santos, A. M., Costa, F. A., Viana, J.: Enhancing MOOC videos: design and production strategies. pp. 107 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. Deng, L., Tavares, N.J.: Exploring university students’ use of technologies beyond the formal learning context: a tale of two online platforms. Aust. J. Educ. Technol. 31(3), 313–327 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. Downes, S.: Connectivism and connective knowledge. Essays on meaning and learning networks. National Research Council Canada (2012)Google Scholar
  19. Ergüney, M.: Uzaktan Eğitimin Geleceği: MOOC (Massive Open Online Course). J. Res. Educ. Teach. 4(4), 15–22 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. Graham, L., Fredenberg, V.: Impact of an open online course on the connectivist behaviours of Alaska teachers. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 31(2), 140–149 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hernandez-Carranza, E.-E., Romero-Corella, S.-I., Ramirez-Montoya, M.-S.: Evaluation of digital didactic skills in massive open online courses: a contribution to the Latin American Movement. Comunicar 22(44), 81–89 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holmgren, R.: New ways of learning to fight fires? Learning processes and contradictions in distance and on-campus firefighter training in Sweden Learning processes supported by digital technologies: a student. 31(2), 220–234 (2015)Google Scholar
  23. Israel, M.J.: Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 16(5), 102–118 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kayabaş, B.K., Mutlu, M.E.: Kitlesel Açık Çevrimiçi Derslerin Anadolu Üniversitesinde Uygulanabilirliği. Akademik Bilişim 2013, XV. Akademik Bilişim Konferans Bildirileri, pp. 491–496 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. Kiers, J., Jorge, N.: Experiences from 18 delftX MOOCs. Proceedings paper EMOOCs. pp. 65–70Google Scholar
  26. Li, K.M.: Learning styles and perceptions of student teachers of computer-supported collaborative learning strategy using wikis. Aust. J. Educ. Technol. 31(1), 32–50 (2015)Google Scholar
  27. Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., Mustain, P.: Internet and Higher Education Learning in MOOCs: motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. Internet High. Educ. 29, 40–48 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Williams, S.A.: Elderly learners and massive open online courses: a review. 5 (2016). doi: 10.2196/ijmr.4937
  29. Mackness, J., Bell, F., Funes, M.: The rhizome: a problematic metaphor for teaching and learning in a MOOC. Aust. J. Educ. Technol. 32(1), 78–91 (2016)Google Scholar
  30. Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., Littlejohn, A.: Computers and education instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Comput. Educ. 80, 77–83 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Markova, T., Glazkova, I., Zaborova, E.: Quality issues of online distance learning. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 237(June 2016), 685–691 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.043
  32. McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Cormier, D., Siemens, G.: In the open: The MOOC model for digital practice. SSHRC application. In: Knowledge synthesis for the digital economy (2010)Google Scholar
  33. Milligan, S., He, J., Bailey, J., Zhang, R., Rubinstein, B. I.: Validity: a framework for crossdisciplinary collaboration in mining indicators of learning from MOOC forums. In: proceedings of the sixth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge, pp. 546–547. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  34. Monedero-Moya, J., Cebrian-Robles, D., Desenne, P.: Usability and satisfaction in multimedia annotation tools for MOOCs. Comunicar 22(44), 55–62 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Montgomery, A.P., Hayward, D.V., Dunn, W., Carbonaro, M., Amrhein, C.G.: Blending for student engagement: lessons learned for MOOCs and beyond. Aust. J. Educ. Technol. 31(6), 657–670 (2015)Google Scholar
  36. Moreira, J., Reis-monteiro, A., Machado, A.: Higher education distance learning and e-learning in prisons in Portugal. Comunicar 25(51), 39–49 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ozturk, D., Eyikara, E., Baykara, Z.G.: The opinions of nursing students regarding the first implementation of distance education. World J. Educ. Technol. Curr. Issues 9(2), 51–58 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pappano, L.: The Year of the MOOC. N. Y. Times. 2(12), 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  39. Peter, S., Deimann, M.: On the role of openness in education: A historical reconstruction. Open Praxis. 5(1), 7–14 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pettit, J.: Ascilite “Partly self-made niches”? Student-only spaces in an LMS Introduction: “The students own education”. Aust. J. Educ. Technol. 30(1), 16–30 (2014)Google Scholar
  41. Raman, A., Mohd, R., Kaur, P.: Facebook as a collaborative and communication tool: a study of secondary school students in Malaysia. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 155(October), 141–146 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rodriguez, O.: The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). Open Praxis 5(1), 67–73 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sabana, L., Hine, N.: Literature and practice: a critical review of MOOCs. Comunicar 22(44), 9–17 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spencer, B.: Removing barriers and enhancing openness: distance education as social adult education. Int. J. E Learn. Distance Educ. 10(2), 87–104 (2008)Google Scholar
  45. Spyropoulou, N., Demopoulou, G., Pierrakeas, C.: Developing a computer programming MOOC. Procedia Procedia Comput. Sci. 65(Iccmit), 182–191 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.107
  46. Su, A.Y.S., Yang, S.J.H., Hwang, W., Zhang, J.: Computers & Education A Web 2. 0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Comput. Educ. 55(2), 752–766 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Üstün, A., Akman, E.: Özel Okul Öğretmenlerinin Eğitimde Teknoloji Kullanımına İlişkin Tutum ve Görüşleri (Samsun İli Örneği). J. Educ. Sci. 3(4), 94–103 (2015).
  48. Wiley, D.: Open source, openness, and higher education. Innov. J. Online Educ. 3(1), 1 (2006)Google Scholar
  49. Yuan, L., Powell, S.: MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education (JISC CETISwhite paper). Retrived from (2013)
  50. Zembylas, M., Charalambous, P., Charalambous, C.: Teachers’ emerging stances and repertoires towards reconciliation: potential and challenges in Greek-Cypriot education. J. Peace Educ. 8(1), 19–36 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang, J.: Can MOOCs be interesting to students? An experimental investigation from regulatory focus perspective*. Comput. Educ. 95, 340–351 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ataturk Faculty of EducationNear East UniversityNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations