Quality & Quantity

, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 1065–1091 | Cite as

Analysis of technological innovation based on citation information

  • Gabjin OhEmail author
  • Ho-Yong Kim
  • Ayoung Park


The paper discusses the dynamic properties of the patent network. Technological innovation occurs frequently, and predicting where it will happen is difficult because an economic system can adapt to changing technology. We construct a patent network based on the cited relations between patents and analyze the properties of the patent network from January 1976 to December 2005 by using USPTO patent data. We find that technology trends, which are calculated by our measures, are similar with historical trends of technology, showing that our measures would be useful to predict future technology relations. Also, we find that the change of similarity between patents shows meaningful results in terms of technological innovation.


Patent Network analysis Technological innovation 



This work was supported by research funds from Chosun University, Korea, 2015.


  1. Archibugi, D., Planta, M.: Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation 16(9), 451–519 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basberg, B.L.: Patent statistics and the measurement of technological changean assessment of the norwegian patent data, 18401980. World Pat. Inform. 6(4), 158–164 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basberg, B.L.: Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature. Res. Policy 16(2), 131–141 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, D.Z., Chang, H.W., Huang, M.H., Fu, F.C.: Core technologies and key industries in taiwan from 1978 to 2002: a perspective from patent analysis. Scientometrics 64(1), 31–53 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cho, T.S., Shih, H.Y.: Patent citation network analysis of core and emerging technologies in taiwan: 1997–2008. Scientometrics 89(3), 795–811 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Debackere, K., Verbeek, A., Luwel, M., Zimmermann, E.: Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology-ii: the multiple uses of technometric indicators. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 4, 213–231 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duguet, E., MacGarvie, M.: How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from french innovation surveys. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 14(5), 375–393 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fleming, L., King, C., Juda, A.I.: Small worlds and regional innovation. SSRN 892871 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Ganguli, P.: Patents and patent information in 1979 and 2004: a perspective from india. World Pat. Inform. 26(1), 61–62 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gautam, P., Kodama, K., Enomoto, K.: Joint bibliometric analysis of patents and scholarly publications from cross-disciplinary projects: implications for development of evaluative metrics. J. Contemp. East. Asia 13(1), 19–37 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gress, B.: Properties of the uspto patent citation network: 1963–2002. World Pat. Inform. 32(1), 3–21 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M.: The NBER patent citation data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools. Tech. rep. Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hirsch, J.E.: An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(46), 16569–16572 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang, K.: International student flows between Asia, Australia, and Russia: a network analysis. J. Contemp. East. Asia 13(1), 83–98 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. Jiang, K., Barnett, G.A.: Guanxi networks in China. J. Contemp. East. Asia 12(2), 89 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kostoff, R.N., Schaller, R.R.: Science and technology roadmaps. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 48(2), 132–143 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lacasa, I., Grupp, H., Schmoch, U.: Tracing technological change over long periods in germany in chemicals using patent statistics. Scientometrics 57(2), 175–195 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maggioni, M.A., Uberti, T.E.: Networks and geography in the economics of knowledge flows. Qual. Quant. 45(5), 1031–1051 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meier, H.: Global civil society from hyperlink perspective: Exploring the website networks of international NGOs. J. Contemp. East. Asia 15(1) (2016)Google Scholar
  20. Meyer, M.: Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: an exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics 51(1), 163–183 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Milman, B.: Individual co-citation clusters as nuclei of complete and dynamic informetric models of scientific and technological areas. Scientometrics 31(1), 45–57 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murray, F.: Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering. Res. Policy 31(8), 1389–1403 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Narin, F.: Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics 30(1), 147–155 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nonaka, T., Takeuchi, H.: The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  25. Rotundo, G., D’Arcangelis, A.M.: Network of companies: an analysis of market concentration in the italian stock market. Qual Quant 48(4), 1893–1910 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J.W., Fleming, L.: Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Res. Policy 35(7), 994–1017 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stefani, S., Torriero, A.: Networks, topology and dynamics. Qual. Quant. 48(4), 1817–1819 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., Jaffe, A.: University versus corporate patents: a window on the basicness of invention. Econ. Innovat. New Technol. 5(1), 19–50 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., Zimmermann, E.: Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology-i: the multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 4(2), 179–211 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Von Wartburg, I., Teichert, T., Rost, K.: Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Res. Policy 34(10), 1591–1607 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xu, W.W., Feng, M.: Networked creativity on the censored web 2.0: Chinese users twitter-based activities on the issue of internet censorship. J. Contemp. East. Asia 14(1), 23–43 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yang, H., Jung, W.S.: Assessing knowledge structures for public research institutes. J. Contemp. East. Asia 15(1) (2016)Google Scholar
  33. Yoon, B., Park, Y.: A text-mining-based patent network: analytical tool for high-technology trend. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 15(1), 37–50 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Business AdministrationChosun UniversityGwangjuSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations