Quality & Quantity

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 47–63 | Cite as

Conformity through the mobile phone choices of the young French

Article

Abstract

This article deals with French young people. It is about conformity in the private sphere (and how this relates to the “dodging” of politics). My hypothesis was that being consistent with one’s closest network is satisfying and the ability to oppose its influence is favored by a higher degree of general satisfaction, or satisfaction in some activities. Glaser and Strauss’s grounded theory method was used: to its authors, comparing populations showing sufficient dissimilarities allows to produce theoretical conclusions. The chosen object was the cell phone, three different populations got interviewed from March 2010 till April 2011. Three processes (satisfaction, materialism, family) can explain the ability for an individual to oppose within the realm of privacy. When they were combined, only three exceptions can be noticed and could be explained: these processes are in fact causes or manifestations of the “dodging” of politics. Considering the small number of exceptions and the macro level data, questions arise about the ability of French young people to oppose, not only in the public sphere, but also in the private sphere.

Keywords

Conformity Consumption Gender Grounded theory Social network analysis QCA 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Simon Langlois, David Lepoutre, Laurent Mell, Guillaume Chanson, Marie-Rose Marinissen and Jorge Munoz for their time and/or help. I would also like to thank Marie-Hélène Vigliano and Pascal Cuvelier for their help in 2010 and 2011.

References

  1. Asch, S.E.: Opinions and social pressure. Sci. Am. 193, 31–35 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assouline, D.: Rapport d’information sur l’impact des nouveaux médias sur la jeunesse. Sénat. 46. 22 octobre 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. Barré, G.: L’ « esquive » du politique des jeunes français et sa relation avec le conformisme dans la sphère privée (étude empirique). Thèse de doctorat. Université Paris-Dauphine (2012)Google Scholar
  4. Baudrillard, J.: La société de consommation. Denoel, Paris (1970)Google Scholar
  5. Belk, R.W.: Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism : Reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness, In: Kinnear, T. (ed.) Advances in consumer research, vol. 11, pp. 291–297. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research (1984)Google Scholar
  6. Belk, R.W.: Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. J. Consum. Res. 12, 265–280 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bigot, R., Croutte, P. et Daudey, E.: Enquête « Conditions de vie et Aspirations des Français » . La diffusion des technologies de l’information et de la communication dans la société française. Collection des rapports. 297. Novembre 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. Blau, P.M.: Exchange and Power in Social Life. Fifth Printing. ISBN: 0-88738-628-8. New Brunswick (U.S.A.) & London (U.K.), Transaction Publishers (1998) [1964]Google Scholar
  9. Bond, R., Smith, P.B.: Culture and conformity: a meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychol. Bull. 119(I), 111–137 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Céroux, B., Crépin, C.: Rapports aux loisirs et pratiques des adolescents. Politiques sociales et familiales 111, 59–64 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook, D.T.: The other child study. Sociol. Quart. 41(3), 487–507 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dagnaud, M.: Jeunes: la déprime hexagonale. http://www.telos-eu.com/fr/article/jeunes_la_deprime_hexagonale (2008). Accessed 07 July 2015
  13. De Singly, F.: Préface : les jeunesses du monde moderne in Stellinger A. (dir). Les jeunes face à leur avenir. Une enquête internationale. Fondation pour l’innovation politique, pp. 5–16. Paris. (2008)Google Scholar
  14. Elias, N.: La Société des individus. Fayard, Paris (1987)Google Scholar
  15. Elias, N.: Mozart Sociologie d’un génie. Seuil, Paris (1991)Google Scholar
  16. Ferrand, A.: Confidents. Une analyse structurale de réseaux sociaux. L’Harmattan, Paris (2007)Google Scholar
  17. Festinger, L.: A Theory of Dissonance Cognitive. Stanford, California, Stanford University Press. (2001) [1957]Google Scholar
  18. Galland, O.: Les jeunes et la société : des visions contrastées de l’avenir, in Stellinger A. (dir), Les jeunes face à leur avenir. Une enquête internationale. Fondation pour l’innovation politique, pp. 25–54. Paris (2008)Google Scholar
  19. Galland, O.: Les jeunes. 7ème édition. La Découverte, Paris (2009)Google Scholar
  20. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.A.: La découverte de la théorie ancrée. Armand Colin, Paris (2010) [1967]Google Scholar
  21. Heider, F.: The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Wiley, New York (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hogan, B.: Using information networks to study social behavior. IEEE Database Bull. 30(2), 6–14 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. Kasser, T., Ryan R.M.: A dark side of the American dream : Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65, 410–422 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kasser, T., Ryan R.M.: Further Examining the American Dream : Differential Correlates of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Goals. Pers. Soc. Psychol Bull. 22(3), 280–287 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kasser, T.: The High Price of Materialism. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2002)Google Scholar
  26. Lepp, A., Barkley, J.E., Karpinski, A.C.: The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with Life in college students. Rev. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31, 343–350 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lipovetsky, G.: Le crépuscule du devoir. Gallimard, Paris (1992)Google Scholar
  28. Lowenstein, W.: Ces dépendances qui nous gouvernent. Calmann-Lévy, Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  29. Marmot, M., Wilkinson, R. (dir.).: Les déterminants sociaux de la santé: les faits. 2ème édition. OMS (2004)Google Scholar
  30. Muxel, A.: Avoir 20 ans en politique. Seuil, Paris (2010)Google Scholar
  31. Pasquier, D.: Culture lycéenne. Tyrannie de la majorité. Autrement, Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  32. Ragin, C.C.: Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In: Rihoux, B., Ragin, C. (eds.) Configurational Comparative Analysis, pp. 87–121. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (2008)Google Scholar
  33. Richins, M.L., Dawson, S.: A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: scale development and validation. J. Consum. Res. 19, 303–316 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schor, J.: Born To Buy. Scribner, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  35. Scitovsky, T.: L’économie sans joie. Calmann-Lévy, Paris (1978)Google Scholar
  36. Simmel, G.: « La mode » , in La Tragédie de la Culture. pp. 89–127. Paris, Rivages. (1988) [1895]Google Scholar
  37. Smith, A.: Théorie des sentiments moraux. Quadridge, Paris (1999) [1759]Google Scholar
  38. Solomon, M.: Comportement du consommateur. Pearson Education France, Paris (2005) [2004]Google Scholar
  39. Solberg, E.G, Diener, E., Robinson, M.: Why are materialists less satisfied? In Kasser T., Kanner A.D. (eds.). Psychology and Consumer Culture: The Struggle for a Good Life in a Materialistic World, Third Printing (2005), pp. 29–48 (2004)Google Scholar
  40. Stellinger, A. (dir.): Les jeunesses face à leur avenir. Une enquête internationale, Fondation politique pour l’innovation politique. ISBN 978-2-9529612-7-1. Paris (2008)Google Scholar
  41. Tarde, G.: Les Lois de l’imitation. Les empêcheurs de tourner en rond. Seuil, Paris (2001) [1895]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LABERS (Laboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches Sociologiques)Université Bretagne OccidentaleBrest Cedex 3France

Personalised recommendations