Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 1675–1694 | Cite as

Semantic mapping of discourse and activity, using Habermas’s theory of communicative action to analyze process

  • Fionn MurtaghEmail author
  • Monica Pianosi
  • Richard Bull
Article

Abstract

Our primary objective is evaluation of quality of process. This is addressed through semantic mapping of process. We note how this is complementary to the primacy of output results or products. We use goal-oriented discourse as a case study. We draw benefit from how social and political theorist, Jürgen Habermas, uses what was termed “communicative action”. An orientation in Habermas’s work, that we use, is analysis of communication or discourse. For this, we take Twitter social media. In our case study, we map the discourse semantically, using the correspondence analysis platform for such latent semantic analysis. This permits qualitative and quantitative analytics. Our case study is a set of eight carefully planned Twitter campaigns relating to environmental issues. The aim of these campaigns was to increase environmental awareness and behaviour. Each campaign was launched by an initiating tweet. Using the data gathered in these Twitter campaigns, we sought to map them, and hence to track the flow of the Twitter discourse. This mapping was achieved through semantic embedding. The semantic distance between an initiating act and the aggregate semantic outcome is used as a measure of process effectiveness.

Keywords

Correspondence analysis Semantics Multivariate data analysis Text analysis Visualization Social media 

References

  1. Barker, M., Barker, D.I., Bormann, N.F., Neher, K.E.: Social Media Marketing. A Strategic Approach. Cengage Learning, Andover (2012)Google Scholar
  2. Bakliwal, A., Foster, J., van der Puil, J., O’Brien, R., Tounsi, L., Hughes, M.: Sentiment analysis of political tweets: towards an accurate classifier. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Language in Social Media, LASM 2013, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 49–58 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. Benzécri, J.-P.: L’Analyse des Données, Tome I Taxinomie, Tome II Correspondances, 2nd edn. Dunod, Paris (1979)Google Scholar
  4. Benzécri, J.-P.: Correspondence Analysis Handbook. Dekker, Basel (1994)Google Scholar
  5. Blake, J.: Overcoming the “Value-Action Gap” in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environ. 4(3), 257–278 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blasius, J., Greenacre, M. (Eds.): Visualization and Verbalization of Data. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2014)Google Scholar
  7. Bull, R., Petts, J., Evans, J.: Social learning from public engagement: dreaming the impossible? J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 51(5), 701–716 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bull, R., Petts, J., Evans, J.: The importance of context for effective public engagement: learning from the governance of waste. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 8(53), 991–1009 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chew, C., Eysenbach, G.: Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS One 5(11), e14118 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins, J., Thomas, G., Willis, R., Wilsdon, J.: Carrots, sticks and sermons: influencing public behaviour for environmental goals. A Demos/Green Alliance report produced for DEFRA, Demos/Green Alliance, pp. 55 www.demos.co.uk/files/CarrotsSticksSermons.pdf (2003). Retrieved 13 April 2014
  11. Finnis, J., Chan, S., Clements, R.: Let’s get real. How to evaluate online success? Report from the culture 24 action research project. Brighton, pp. 40 http://www.keepandshare.com/doc/3148918/culture24-howtoevaluateonlinesuccess-2-pdf-september-19-2011-11-15-am-2-5-meg?da=y (2011). Retrieved 13 April 2014
  12. Futerra: The Rules of the Game.: The principles of climate change communication. Futerra Sustainability Communications Ltd., London, pp. 5 www.futerra.co.uk/downloads/RulesOfTheGame.pdf (2005). Retrieved 13 April 2014
  13. Howto.gov: Social Media Metrics for Federal Agencies, U.S. General Services Administration. http://www.howto.gov/social-media/using-social-media-in-government/metrics-for-federal-agencies (2013). Retrieved 13 April 2014
  14. Hutto, C.J., Gilbert, E.: VADER: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In: ICWSM 2014, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Ann Arbor, Michigan, June 1–4 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. Le Roux, B., Rouanet, H.: Geometric Data Analysis: From Correspondence Analysis to Structured Data Analysis. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2004)Google Scholar
  16. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., Whitmarsh, L.: Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob. Environ. Change 17(3–4), 445–459 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matušík, M.B.: Jürgen Habermas, philosophy and social theory. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/250787/Jurgen-Habermas/281673/Philosophy-and-social-theory. Retrieved 21 March 2014
  18. McKee, R.: Story: Substance, Structure, Style, and the Principles of Screenwriting. Methuen, London (1999)Google Scholar
  19. Murtagh, F.: Correspondence Analysis and Data Coding with R and Java. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murtagh, F., Ganz, A.: Pattern recognition in narrative: tracking emotional expression in context. Preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.3539 (2015)
  21. Murtagh, F., Contreras, P.: Big data scaling through metric mapping: exploiting the remarkable simplicity of very high dimensional spaces using Correspondence Analysis, in preparation (2015)Google Scholar
  22. Pearce, W., Holmberg, K., Hellsten, I., Nerlich, B.: Climate change on Twitter: topics, communities and conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 report, PLoS One, 9 (4), e94785 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. Pennebaker, J.W.: The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us. Bloomsbury Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  24. Pianosi, M., Bull, R., Rieser, M.: Impact, influence and reach: lessons in measuring the impact of social media, preprint, pp. 36 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. Séguéla, J., Saporta, G.: A comparison between latent semantic analysis and correspondence analysis. Presentation, CARME, Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods Conference, Rennes (2011). http://carme2011.agrocampus-ouest.fr/slides/Seguela_Saporta.pdf
  26. Shove, E.: Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ. Plann. 42, 1273–1285 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Verplanken, B., Walker, I., Daves, A., Jurasek, M.: Context change and travel mode choice: combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypotheses. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 53(8), 991–1009 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ComputingGoldsmiths University of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Computing and MathematicsUniversity of DerbyDerbyUK
  3. 3.Institute of Energy & Sustainable DevelopmentDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations