Quality & Quantity

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 901–917

Publication bias in the German social sciences: an application of the caliper test to three top-tier German social science journals


DOI: 10.1007/s11135-015-0182-4

Cite this article as:
Berning, C.C. & Weiß, B. Qual Quant (2016) 50: 901. doi:10.1007/s11135-015-0182-4


Systematic research reviews have become essential in all empirical sciences. However, the validity of research syntheses is threatened if the preparation, submission or publication of research findings depends on the statistical significance of these findings. The present study investigates publication bias in three top-tier journals in the German social sciences, utilizing the caliper test. For the period between 2001 and 2010, we have collected 156 articles that appeared in the Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (KZfSS), the Zeitschrift für Soziologie (ZfS) and the Politische Vierteljahresschrift (PVS). In all three journals, we found empirical evidence for the existence of publication bias at the 10 % significance level. We also investigated possible causes linked to this bias, including single versus multiple authorship as well as academic degree. We found only weak support for the relationships between individual author characteristics and publication bias.


Publication bias Multilevel analysis Statistical significance Caliper test Type I error 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceJohannes Gutenberg University of MainzMainzGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Sociology and Social PsychologyUniversity of CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations