Quality & Quantity

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 471–490 | Cite as

Attitudes towards Roma people and migrants: a comparison through a Bayesian multidimensional IRT model

Article
First Online:

Abstract

In the context of social psychological research on relations between cultural defined groups, the main topics of interest include ethnic prejudice, attitudes and stereotypes. In the present study, in order to measure and compare attitudes towards Roma people and migrants and to investigate how these attitudes vary according to individual characteristics, we develop an integrated model which embeds a multidimensional Item Response Theory model for polytomous data into a structural equation formulation. Item and person parameters and structural coefficients are estimated on data collected through a web survey. Full probabilistic inference is performed by applying Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques.

Keywords

Prejudice Roma people Migrants SEM IRT models Bayesian estimation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams, R., Wilson, M., Wang, W.: The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 21(1), 1–23 (1997). doi: 10.1177/0146621697211001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allport, G.W.: The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley Publishing, New York (1954)Google Scholar
  3. Altemeyer, B.: The other authoritarian personality. In: Zanna, M.P. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 30, pp. 47–92. Academic Press, London (1998). doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2 Google Scholar
  4. Bar-Tal, D.: Causes and consequences of delegitimization: models of conflict and ethnocentrism. J. Soc. Issues 46, 65–81 (1990). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00272.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Béguin, A., Glas, C.: MCMC estimation and some model-fit analysis of multidimensional IRT models. Psychometrika 66(4), 541–561 (2001). doi: 10.1007/BF02296195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, J.W.: Fundamental psychological processes in intercultural relations. In: Landis, D., Bennett, J., Bennett, M. (eds.) Handbook of Intercultural Training, pp. 166–185. SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, J.W.: Mutual attitudes among immigrants and ethnocultural groups in Canada. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 30(6), 719–734 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bogardus, E.: A social distance scale. Sociol. Soc. Res. 17, 265–271 (1933)Google Scholar
  9. Bollen, K.A.: Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, New York (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, R.: Prejudice: Its Social Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  11. Capozza, D., Brown, R.: Social Identity Processes: Trends in Theory and Research. Sage, London (2000)Google Scholar
  12. Cowles, M.: Accelerating Monte Carlo Markov chain convergence for cumulative-link generalized linear models. Stat. Comput. 6(2), 101–111 (1996). doi: 10.1007/BF00162520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Ayala, R.J.: The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. The Guilford Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  14. de Jong, M., Steenkamp, J.: Finite mixture multilevel multidimensional ordinal IRT models for large scale cross-cultural research. Psychometrika 75(1), 3–32 (2010). doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9134-z
  15. Fiske, S.: La cognizione sociale. Il Mulino, Bologna (2006)Google Scholar
  16. Gaertner, S., Dovidio, J.: The aversive form of racism. In: Dovidio, J., Gaertner, S. (eds.) Prejudice, Discriminations and Racism, pp. 61–90. Academic Press, San Diego (1986)Google Scholar
  17. Gallissot, R., Kilani, M., Rivera, A.: L’imbroglio etnico in quattordici parole chiave. Dedalo, Bari (2001)Google Scholar
  18. Guttman, L.: The basis for scalogram analysis. In: Stouffer, S., Guttman, L., Schuman, E. (eds.) Measurement and Prediction, vol 4 of Studies in Social Psychology in World War II. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1950)Google Scholar
  19. Lazarsfeld, P.F., Henry, N.W.: Latent Structure Analysis. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1968)Google Scholar
  20. Lerner, G.: Gli zingari, gli ebrei e le leggende razziste, vol. 1, p. 19. La Repubblica 1 Marzo, Rome (2007)Google Scholar
  21. Marcu, A., Chryssochoou, X.: Exclusion of ethnic groups from the realm of humanity: prejudice against the Gypsies in Britain and in Romania. Psicologia Política 30, 41–56 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. Mazzara, B.: Appartenenza e pregiudizio: psicologia sociale delle relazioni interetniche. Carocci, Roma (1999)Google Scholar
  23. Meertens, R., Pettigrew, T.: Is subtle prejudice really prejudice? Public Opin Q 61(1), 54–71 (1997). doi: 10.1086/297786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moscovici, S., Pérez, J.: Representations of society and prejudices. Pap. Soc. Represent. 6(1), 27–36 (1997)Google Scholar
  25. Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., Tannenbaum, P.H.: The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1957)Google Scholar
  26. Passini, S., Villano, P.: Judging moral issues in a multicultural society. Swiss J. Psychol. 72(4), 235–239 (2013). doi: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pérez, J.A., Chulvi, B., Alonso, R.: When a majority fails to convert a minority: the case of Gypsies. In: Butera, F., Mugny, G. (eds.) Social Influence in Social Reality: Promoting Individual and Social Change, pp. 143–164. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Ashland (2001)Google Scholar
  28. Pérez, P.J., Rojas, A.J., Navas, M., Lozano, O.M.: Structural model of acculturation attitudes and related psychosocial variables: empirical evidence in native Spaniards. Int. J. Psychol. 49(3), 175–182 (2014). doi: 10.1002/ijop.12017 Google Scholar
  29. Pettigrew, T.F., Meertens, R.W.: Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 25(1), 57–75 (1995). doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420250106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pettigrew, T.F., Meertens, R.W.: In defense of the subtle prejudice concept: a retort. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 31(3), 299–309 (2001). doi: 10.1002/ejsp.45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pew Research Center.: A Fragile Rebound for EU Image on Eve of European Parliament Elections. http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/05/12/a-fragile-rebound-for-eu-image-on-eve-of-european-parliament-elections/ (2014).
  32. Reckase, M.D.: The past and future of multidimensional item response theory. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 21(1), 25–36 (1997). doi: 10.1177/0146621697211002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reicher, S.: From perception to mobilization: the shifting paradigm of prejudice. In: Dixon, J., Levine, M. (eds.) Beyond Prejudice: Extending the Social Psychology of Conflict, Inequality and Social Change, pp. 27–48. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  34. Reyna, C., Dobria, O., G, W.: The complexity and ambivalence of immigration attitudes: ambivalent stereotypes predict conflicting attitudes toward immigration policies. Cult. Divers. Ethn. Minor. Psychol. 19(3), 342–356 (2013). doi: 10.1037/a0032942 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rojas, A.J., Lozano, O.M., Navas, M., Pérez, P.J.: Prejudiced attitude measurement using the Rasch rating scale model. Psychol. Rep. 109(2), 553–572 (2011). doi: 10.2466/07.17.PR0.109.5.553-572 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Samejima, F.: Estimation of a Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores, Psychometric Monograph, vol. 17. Psychometric Society, Richmond (1969)Google Scholar
  37. Sheng, Y., Wikle, C.: Comparing multiunidimensional and unidimensional item response theory models. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 67(6), 899–919 (2007). doi: 10.1177/0013164406296977 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sheng, Y., Wikle, C.: Bayesian multidimensional IRT models with a hierarchical structure. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 68(3), 413–430 (2008). doi: 10.1177/0013164407308512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Skrondal, A., Rabe-Hesketh, S.: Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal, and Structural Equation Models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tajfel, H.: Cognitive aspects of prejudice. J. Soc. Issues 25(4), 79–97 (1969). doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00620.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tanner, M.A., Wong, W.H.: The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82(398), 528–540 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thulin, M.: Decision-theoretic justifications for bayesian hypothesis testing using credible sets. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 146, 133–138 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2013.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Selm, M., Jankowski, N.W.: Conducting online surveys. Qual. Quant. 40(3), 435–456 (2006). doi: 10.1007/s11135-005-8081-8
  44. Villano, P., Zani, B.: Social dominance orientation and prejudice in an Italian sample. Psychol. Rep. 101(2), 614–616 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Villano, P.: Fuori dai giochi. La psicologia di fronte all’esclusione sociale. Pearson, Milano (2013a)Google Scholar
  46. Villano, P.: Pregiudizi e stereotipi. Carocci, Roma (2013b)Google Scholar
  47. Voci, A., Pagotto, L.: Il pregiudizio: che cosa è, come si riduce. GLF Editori Laterza, Torino-Bari (2010)Google Scholar
  48. Whitley Jr, B.E.: Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77(1), 126–134 (1999). doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wright, B.D., Masters, G.N.: Rating Scale Analysis. MESA Press, Chicago (1982)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lara Fontanella
    • 1
  • Paola Villano
    • 2
  • Marika Di Donato
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity G. D’AnnunzioPescaraItaly
  2. 2.Department of EducationUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.PescaraItaly

Personalised recommendations