Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 177–191 | Cite as

How to classify political cultures? A comparison of three methods of classification

  • Thomas DenkEmail author
  • Henrik Serup Christensen
Article

Abstract

To study the composition of political cultures, it is necessary to classify citizens according to a theoretical typology of political subcultures. Different methods of classification have been used for confronting this challenge, but the choice of method is rarely discussed in any detail because most studies apply a method without considering implications or possible alternatives. This is unfortunate because the choice of method has important consequences for the ensuing results. With this article, we aim to determine the implications of different methods for classification and hereby call attention to the importance of this choice for comparative research on political culture. We compare three commonly used methods of classification: critical thresholds, factor analysis and cluster analysis. These methods are used for classifying respondents from the 2008 European Social Survey according to a typology of political subcultures. Based on empirical analyses, we conclude that: (a) the choice of method of classification affects the outcome of the analysis, (b) cluster analysis and factor analysis may result in classifications that do not adequately reflect the theoretical typology, and (c) cluster analysis and factor analysis provide classifications that differ depending on analytical level. While the results do not show that either method is inherently superior, they clearly demonstrate that the choice of method should be recognized as a critical part of the research process.

Keywords

Methods of classification Political culture Cluster analysis Factor analysis Critical thresholds Comparative survey analysis 

References

  1. Abdelzadeh, A., Ekman, J.: Understanding critical citizenship and other forms of public dissatisfaction: an alternative framework. Polit. Cult. Social. 3(1–2), 179–196 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. Aldenderfer, M.S.: Cluster Analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1985)Google Scholar
  3. Almond, G.A., Verba, S.: The Civic Culture—Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Little, Brown and Company, Boston (1963/1965)Google Scholar
  4. Amnå, E., Ekman, J.: Standby citizens: diverse faces of political passivity. Eur. Polit. Sci. Rev. 6, 261–281 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey, K.D.: Typologies and Taxonomies—An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Sage Publications, London (1994)Google Scholar
  6. Bethlehem, J., Medrano, J.D., Groves, R.M., Gundelach, P., Norris, P.: Report of the Review Panel for the European Social Survey. European Science Foundation, Standing Committee for Social Sciences (SCSC). http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/about/ESS_review_panel_report.pdf (2008). Accessed 22 Feb 2014
  7. Byrne, D.: Cluster Analysis. Sage Publications, London (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Child, D.: Essentials of Factor Analysis. Continuum International Publishing Group, London (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Dalton, R.J.: Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices—The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Denk, T.: Politisk kultur [Political Culture]. Liber, Malmö (2009)Google Scholar
  11. Diamond, L.: Developing Democracy—Toward Consolidation. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1999)Google Scholar
  12. Geissel, B.: Reflections and findings on the critical citizens: civic education—what for? Eur. J. Polit. Res. 47, 34–63 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. Gerring, J.: Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  14. Goertz, G., Mahoney, J.: A Tale of Two Cultures—Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)Google Scholar
  15. Gorsuch, R.L.: Factor Analysis. Taylor and Francis, London (2013)Google Scholar
  16. Hay, C.: Why We Hate Politics. Polity, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  17. Hay, C., Stoker, G.: Revitalising Politics: Have We lost the Plot? Representation 45(3), 225–236 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hibbing, J.R., Theiss-Morse, E.: Stealth Democracy—Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hooghe, M., Dejaeghere, Y.: Does the ‘Monitorial Citizen’ exist? An empirical investigation into the occurrence of postmodern forms of citizenship in the Nordic countries. Scand. Polit. Stud. 30(2), 249–271 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Inglehart, R.: The renaissance of political culture. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 82(04), 1203–1230 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Inglehart, R.: Modernization and Postmodernization—Cultural, Economic, and Political Chance in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1997)Google Scholar
  22. Inglehart, R., Welzel, W.: Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy—The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jackman, R.W., Miller, R.A.: A renaissance of political vulture? Am. J. Polit. Sci. 40, 632–659 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, J.: Conceptual problems as obstacles to progress in political science: four decades of political culture research. J. Theor. Polit. 15(1), 87–115 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim, J.-O.: Factor Analysis—Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1979)Google Scholar
  26. Laitin, D.D.: The civic culture at 30. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 89(1), 168–173 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lane, R.: Political cultural: residual category or general theory. Comp. Polit. Stud. 25(3), 362–368 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Linz, J.J., Stepan, A.: Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation—Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1996)Google Scholar
  29. Mainwaring, S., Pérez-Liñán, A.: Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival, and Fall. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Norris, P. (ed.): Critical Citizens—Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  31. Norusis, M.: IBM SPSS Statistics 19 Statistical Procedures Companion. Addison Wesley, Boston (2011)Google Scholar
  32. Patrick, G.: Political culture. In: Sartori, G. (ed.) Social Science Concept: A Systematic Analysis, pp. 265–314. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1984)Google Scholar
  33. Pettai, V.: Studying political culture in post-Communist Europe. In: Berglund, S., Henningsen, B., Schartau, M.-B. (eds.) Political Culture: Values and Identities in the Baltic Sea Region, pp. 83–97. Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
  34. Putnam, R.D.: Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993)Google Scholar
  35. Rosanvallon, P.: Counter-Democracy—Politics in the Age of Distrust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rose, R., Mishler, W., Haerpfer, C.: Democracy and Its Alternatives—Understanding Post-Communist Societies. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1998)Google Scholar
  37. Schneider, C.Q., Wagnemann, C.: Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences—A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schudson, M.: What if civic life didn’t die? Am. Prospect 25, 17–20 (1996)Google Scholar
  39. Stoker, G.: Why Politics Matters—Making Democracy Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2006)Google Scholar
  40. Stoker, G.: The rise of political disenchantment. In: Hay, C. (ed.) New Directions in Political Science: Responding to the Challenges of an Interdependent World, pp. 43–63. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan (2010)Google Scholar
  41. Street, J.: Political culture: from civic culture to mass culture. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 24(1), 95–114 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van de Vijver, F., Leung, K.: Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. Sage Publications, London (1997)Google Scholar
  43. Wilson, R.W.: The many voices of political culture: assessing different approaches. World Polit. 52(2), 246–273 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Åbo Akademi UniversityÅboFinland

Personalised recommendations