Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 48, Issue 6, pp 3489–3509 | Cite as

Exploring the relationship between freedom from corruption and business governance in the Oceania region

  • Suwastika NaiduEmail author
  • Anand Chand
Article

Abstract

This paper empirically investigates the relationship between Freedom from Corruption Index and business governance in the Oceania region by using the Pearson’s correlation coefficients, ordinary least square regression model and ordinary least square regression based decomposition analysis. This paper found that all eleven business governance indicators are positively correlated to Freedom from Corruption Index. Eight business governance indicators; namely, (1) trading across borders, (2) enforcing contracts, (3) resolving contracts, (4) ease of doing business, (5) registering property, (6) getting credit, (7) paying taxes and (8) starting a business significantly influences Freedom from Corruption Index. One standard deviation increase in eleven business governance indicators is associated with about 3.47 % point increase in Freedom from Corruption Index. All eleven business governance indicators contribute between 20 and 40 % differences in freedom from corruption in the Oceania region. All eleven business governance indicators contribute between 5.17 and 10.88 % to freedom from corruption in the Oceania region.

Keywords

Freedom from Corruption Index Business governance  Economic growth Oceania region Decomposition analysis 

References

  1. Aidt, T.S.: Corruption, institutions, and economic development. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 25, 271–291 (2009). doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grp012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aidt, T., Dutta, J., Sena, V.: Governance regimes, corruption and growth: theory and evidence. J. Comp. Econ. 36, 195–220 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2007.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alonso, J.A., Garcimartín, C.: The determinants of institutional quality more on the debate. J. Int. Dev. 25, 206–226 (2013). doi: 10.1002/jid.1710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackburn, K., Bose, N., Haque, M.E.: Endogenous corruption in economic development. J. Econ. Stud. 37, 4–25 (2010). doi: 10.1108/01443581011012234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braendle, U.C., Gasser, T., Noll, J.: Corporate governance in China—Is economic growth potential hindered by Guanxi? Bus. Soc. Rev. 110, 389–405 (2005). doi: 10.1111/j.0045-3609.2005.00022.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breen, M., Gillanders, R.: Corruption, institutions and regulation. Econ. Gov. 13, 263–285 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s10101-012-0111-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chand, A.: Human resource strategies in small states: the case of garment factories in the Fiji Islands. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2, 273–284 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S0738-0593(00)00034-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chand, A.: At the bottom of a global commodity chain—How different really are hourly wage rates and piece rates? Ind. Relat. J. 43, 171–191 (2012). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2338.2012.00668.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chand, A.: Domestic business firms learning from TNC buyers: empirical evidence from the Fiji garment industry. Int. J. Bus. Glob. 10, 372–382 (2013). doi: 10.1504/IJBG.2013.054384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dana, L.P.: Entrepreneurship and venture creation: an international comparison of five commonwealth nations. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Centre of Entrepreneurial Studies, Babson College, Wellesley, MA (1987)Google Scholar
  11. Dana, L.P.: Saint Martin or Sint Maarten: a case study of the effects of culture on economic development. J. Small Bus. Manag. 28, 91–98 (1990). doi:http://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-10360741/saint-martin-sint-maarten-a-case-study-of-the-effects Google Scholar
  12. Dana, L.P.: Environment for entrepreneurship: a model of public policy and economic development. J. Entrepreneurship 2, 73–88 (1993). doi: 10.1177/097135579300200105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dana, L.P.: Public policy and entrepreneurship in the Caribbean: nine styles of policy. J. Private Enterp. 10, 119–141 (1995). doi:http://www.mang.canterbury.ac.nz/docs/dana/PublicPolicyCaribbean.pdf Google Scholar
  14. Dana, L.P.: A framework for the classification of government policy on entrepreneurship: contrasting six models. J. Small Bus. Entrepreneurship 10, 2–13 (2008). doi: 10.1080/08276331.1992.10600416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Vaal, A., Ebben, W.: Institutions and the relation between corruption and economic growth. Rev. Dev. Econ. 15, 108–123 (2011). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2010.00596.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisman, R., Gatti, R.: Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries. J. Public Econ. 83, 325–345 (2002). doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-2290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gupta, S., Davoodi, H., Alonso-Terme, R.: Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? Econ. Gov. 3, 23–45 (2002). doi: 10.1007/s101010100039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gyimah-Brempong, K.: Corruption, economic growth, and income inequality in Africa. Econ. Gov. 3, 183–209 (2002). doi: 10.1007/s101010200045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hellman, J.S., Jones, G., Kaufmann, D., Schankerman, M.: Measuring governance, corruption, and state capture. World Bank policy research paper no 2312, Washington, USA (2000)Google Scholar
  20. Huang, R.: Taxation and Government Finance in Sixteenth Century Ming China. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1974)Google Scholar
  21. Jones, A.M., Nicolás, Á.L.: Allowing for heterogeneity in the decomposition of measures of inequality in health. J. Econ. Inequal. 4, 347–365 (2006). doi: 10.1007/s10888-005-9019-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M.: Growth and governance: a reply. J. Polit. 69, 555–562 (2007). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00550.x Google Scholar
  23. Kuncoro, A.: Corruption and business uncertainty in Indonesia. ASEAN Econ. Bull. 23, 11–30 (2006). doi: 10.1353/ase.2006.0005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kurtz, M.J., Schrank, A.: Growth and governance: models, measures, and mechanisms. J. Polit. 69, 538–554 (2007). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00549.x Google Scholar
  25. Larmour, P.: Corruption and governance in the South Pacific. J. Pac. Stud. 20, 1–17 (1997). doi:https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/41612 Google Scholar
  26. Licht, A.N., Goldschmidt, C., Schwartz, S.H.: Culture rules: the foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. J. Comp. Econ. 35, 659–688 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2007.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mathur, A., Singh, K.: Foreign direct investment, corruption and democracy. Appl. Econ. 45, 991–1002 (2013). doi: 10.1080/00036846.2011.613786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Méndez, F., Sepúlveda, F.: Corruption, growth and political regimes: cross country evidence. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 22, 82–98 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Méon, P.G., Sekkat, K.: Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth? Public Choice 122, 69–97 (2005). doi: 10.1007/s11127-005-3988-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mishra, A.: Persistence of corruption: some theoretical perspectives. World Dev. 34, 349–358 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Naidu, S.: The economic impact index of the employment relations promulgation (2007) on the Fiji Islands. Int. J. Bus. Compet. Growth 2, 152–164 (2012a). doi: 10.1504/IJBCG.2012.046287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Naidu, S.: The Nexus between human resource management practices and employment law in the Fiji Islands: a study of the employment relations promulgation. Int. J. Entrepreneurship Small Bus. 16, 164–175 (2012b). doi: 10.1504/IJESB.2012.047114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Naidu, S., Chand, A.: A comparative study of the financial problems faced by micro, small and medium enterprises in the manufacturing sector of Fiji and Tonga. Int. J. Emerg. Markets 7, 245–262 (2012a). doi: 10.1108/17468801211236974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Naidu, S., Chand, A.: Barriers to micro, small and medium enterprise growth in the Fiji Islands: an empirical estimation using OLS regression model. Int. J. Entrepreneurship Small Bus. 16, 147–163 (2012b). doi: 10.1504/IJESB.2012.047113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Naidu, S., Chand, A.: Does central government health expenditure and medical technology advancement determine economic growth rates in the Pacific island countries? Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Adm. 5, 234–245 (2013a). doi: 10.1108/APJBA-01-2013-0005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Naidu, S., Chand, A.: Financial problems faced by micro, small and medium enterprises in the small island states: a case study of the manufacturing sector of the Fiji Islands. Int. J. Bus. Excell. 6, 1–21 (2013b). doi: 10.1504/IJBEX.2013.050573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Naidu, S., Chand, A.: Human Resource Management Practices and Firm Performance in the Pacific Island Countries. Nova Science Publishers, USA (2013c)Google Scholar
  38. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., Trebbi, F.: Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. J. Econ. Growth 9, 131–165 (2004). doi: 10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rose-Ackerman, S.: Governance and corruption. In: Lomborg, B. (ed.) Global Crises, Global Solutions. Cambridge University Press, UK (2004)Google Scholar
  40. Rothstein, B., Teorell, J.: What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance 21, 165–190 (2008). doi:http://www.gu.se/digitalAssets/1358/1358049_what-is-quality-of-government.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scherer, A.G., Palazzo, G.: The new political role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. J. Manag. Stud. 48, 899–931 (2011). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Swaleheen, M.: Economic growth with endogenous corruption: an empirical study. Public Choice 146, 23–41 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s11127-009-9581-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Szeftel, M.: Between governance & under-development: accumulation & Africa’s ‘Catastrophic Corruption’. Rev. Afr. Polit. Econ. 27, 287–306 (2000). doi:http://www.jstor.org/stable/4006601 Google Scholar
  44. Treisman, D.: What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 10, 211–244 (2007). doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wagstaff, A., van Doorslaer, E., Watanabe, N.: On decomposing the causes of health sector inequalities with an application to malnutrition inequalities in Vietnam. J. Econom. 112, 207–223 (2003). doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-2714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Waquet, J.C.: Corruption: Ethics and Power in Florence, 1600–1770. Polity Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  47. Weitzel, U., Berns, S.: Cross-border takeovers, corruption, and related aspects of governance. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 37, 786–806 (2006). doi:http://ideas.repec.org/p/use/tkiwps/0603.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu, X.: Corporate governance and corruption: a cross-country analysis. Governance 18, 151–170 (2005). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00271.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business and Economics, School of Management and Public AdministrationUniversity of the South PacificSuvaFiji

Personalised recommendations