On the choice of measures of reliability and validity in the content-analysis of texts
- 621 Downloads
The paper discusses several reliability measures: Scott’s pi, Krippendorff’s alpha, free marginal adjustment (Bennett, Alpert and Goldstein’s \(S\)), Cohen’s kappa, and Perreault and Leigh’s \(I\) and the assumptions on which they are based. It is suggested that correlation coefficients between, on one hand, the distribution of qualitative codes and, on the other hand, word co-occurrences and the distribution of the categories identified with the help of the dictionary based on substitution complement the other reliability measures. The paper shows that the choice of the reliability measure depends on the format of the text (stylistic versus rhetorical) and the type of reading (comprehension versus interpretation). Namely, Cohen’s kappa and Bennett, Alpert and Goldstein’s \(S\) emerge as reliability measures particularly suited for perspectival reading of rhetorical texts. Outcomes of the content analysis of 57 texts performed by four coders with the help of computer program QDA Miner inform the analysis.
KeywordsReliability measures Content analysis Correlation analysis Interpretation Comprehension Stylistic texts Rhetorical texts
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers of Quality & Quantity for their helpful and constructive suggestions and comments. However, all remaining errors and inaccuracies are solely attributable to the authors.
- Bryman, A., Bell, E., Teevan, J.J.: Social Research Methods, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Don Mills (2012)Google Scholar
- Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2004a)Google Scholar
- Lotman, Y.: Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1990)Google Scholar
- Neuendorf, K.A.: The Content Analysis Guidebook. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2002)Google Scholar
- Norris, S.P., Philips, L.M.: The relevance of a reader’s knowledge within a perspectival view of reading. J. Read. Behav. 26(4), 391–412 (1994)Google Scholar
- Oleinik, A., Kirdina S., Popova I., Shatalova T.: Kak uchenye chitayut drug druga: osnova teorii akademicheskogo chteniya [How scientists read: on a theory of academic reading]. SOCIS 8 (2013)Google Scholar
- Salton, G., McGill, M.: Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York (1983)Google Scholar
- Siegel, S., Castellan, N.J.: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. McGraw Hill, New York (1988)Google Scholar
- Warner, R.M.: Applied Statistics. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2008)Google Scholar