Quality & Quantity

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 1337–1346 | Cite as

Deprived or not deprived? Comparing the measured extent of material deprivation using the UK government’s and the Poverty and Social Exclusion surveys’ method of calculating material deprivation

Article

Abstract

Poverty can either be measured directly, through standards of living such as material deprivation, or indirectly through resources available, usually income. Research shows that the optimum measure of poverty combines these methods, a fact that the UK government took cognisance of in its tripartite measure of child poverty. For use in a birth cohort study, two methods of calculating material deprivation were tested: the method used by the UK government taken from the Family Resources Survey (FRS), and the methods used in the Poverty and Social Exclusion (PSE) study at Bristol University. Results show that the former measure, compared to the latter measure, underestimates the depth and extent of material deprivation among families with young children in Scotland.

Keywords

Material deprivation Child poverty UK Scotland Quantitative methodology 

References

  1. Alcock, P.: Understanding Poverty. Macmillan, Basingstoke (2006)Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, M., Chanfreau, J., Tomaszewski, W.: Growing up in Scotland: The Circumstances of Persistently Poor Children. Scottish Government, Edinburgh (2010)Google Scholar
  3. Bradshaw, J., Finch, N.: Overlaps in dimensions of poverty. J. Soc. Policy 32, 513–525 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradshaw, P., Marryat, L., Corbett, J., Ferrandon, M., Tipping, S.: Growing up In Scotland Sweep 4: 2008–2009: User Guide. Scottish Government, Edinburgh (2009)Google Scholar
  5. Callan, T., Nolan, B., Whelan, C.T.: Resources, deprivation and the measurement of poverty. J. Soc. Policy 22, 141–172 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chanfreau, J., Burchardt, T.: Equivalence scales: rationales, uses and assumptions. Scottish Government, Edinburgh (2008)Google Scholar
  7. Desai, M., Shah, A.: An econometric approach to the measurement of poverty. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 40, 505–522 (1988)Google Scholar
  8. Ghiselli, E.E., Campbell, J.P., Zedeck, S.: Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco (1981)Google Scholar
  9. Gordon, D., Pantazis, C.: Breadline Britain in the 1990s. Ashgate, Aldershot (1997)Google Scholar
  10. Government, S.: Poverty and income inequality in Scotland: 2008–09. In: Statistics, N. (ed) Scottish Government, Edinburgh (2010)Google Scholar
  11. Harris, J., Treanor, M.C., Sharma, N.: Below the Breadline: A Year in the Life of Families Living in Poverty. Barnardos, London (2009)Google Scholar
  12. HBAI.: Households Below Average Income: An analysis of the income distribution 1994/5–2010/11. In: Adams, N., Carr, J., Collins, J., Johnson, G., Matejic, P. (eds) London, Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2012)Google Scholar
  13. Kline, T.: Psychological Testing: A Practical Approach To Design And Evaluation. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2005)Google Scholar
  14. Lister, R.: Poverty. Polity, Malden (2004)Google Scholar
  15. Mack, J., Lansley, S.: Poor Britain. G. Allen & Unwin, Oxford (1985)Google Scholar
  16. Mckay, S.: Poverty or preference: what do ‘consensual deprivation indicators’ really mean? Fiscal Stud. 25, 201–223 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pantazis, C., Gordon, D., Levitas, R.: Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Millennium Survey. Policy Press, Bristol (2006)Google Scholar
  18. Piachaud, D.: Children and Poverty. Child Poverty Action Group, London (1981)Google Scholar
  19. Ringen, S.: Direct and indirect measures of poverty. J. Soc. Policy 17, 351–365 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scotcen, : Growing up in Scotland Sweep 4–2008/09 Data Documentation. Scottish Centre for Social Research, Edinburgh (2008)Google Scholar
  21. Smith, N., Middleton, S.: A Review of Poverty Dynamics Research in the UK. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York (2007)Google Scholar
  22. Townsend, P.: Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1979)Google Scholar
  23. Townsend, P.: Deprivation. J. Soc. Policy 16, 125–146 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Whelan, C.T., Layte, R., Maitre, B.: Understanding the mismatch between income poverty and deprivation: A dynamic comparative analysis. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 20, 287–302 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research on Families and RelationshipsUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations