Quality & Quantity

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 507–520 | Cite as

Statistical institutes and economic prosperity

  • Philip Hans Franses
  • Rianne Legerstee


The quality of economic institutions can impact economic growth and it can mediate the relation between economic growth and its drivers. We examine the relevance of one such institution, which is the establishment of a national statistical institute for, amongst others, national accounts. We collect data for 106 countries, and we estimate that there are four separate clusters of countries with similar establishment dates. For these clusters we fit regression models to explain economic growth, and we obtain significant differences across these clusters with respect to relevant explanatory variables and effect sizes, suggesting that a national statistics institute indeed is an important institution for the macro-economy.


Institutions Modeling economic growth Statistical institutions 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J., Thaicharoen Y.: Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: volatility, crises and growth. J. Monet. Econ. 50, 49–123 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelrod R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  3. Barro R.J.: Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q. J. Econ. 106, 407–443 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuaresma C.J., Doppelhofer G.: Nonlinearities in cross-country growth regressions: A Bayesian Averaging of Thresholds (BAT) approach. J. Macroecon. 29, 541–554 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Durlauf S.N., Johnson P.A.: Multiple regimes and cross-country growth behaviour. J. Appl. Econometr. 10, 365–384 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Easterly W., Levine R.: Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. Q. J. Econ. 112, 1203–1250 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalaitzidakis P., Mamuneas T.P., Stengos T.: Measures of human capital and nonlinearities in economic growth. J. Econ. Growth 6, 229–254 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lin, J.Y., Nugent, J.B.: Institutions and economic development. In Behrman, J., Srinivasan, T.N. (eds.) Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 3A. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1995)Google Scholar
  9. Nelson R.R., Sampat B.N.: Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. J. Econ. Behav. Org. 44(1), 31–54 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. North D.C.: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. North D.C.: Economic performance through time. Am. Econ. Rev. 84(3), 359–368 (1994)Google Scholar
  12. Summers R., Heston A.: The Penn World Table (Mark 6.2): An expanded set of international comparisons, 1950–1988. Q. J. Econ. 106(2), 327–368 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ugur, M.: Institutions and Economic Performance: A Review of the Theory and Evidence. Unpublished report, University of Greenwich Business School (2010)Google Scholar
  14. Williamson O.E.: Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press, New York (1975)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Econometric Institute, Erasmus School of EconomicsErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations