Quality & Quantity

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 2361–2377 | Cite as

Perceptions of students university of corporate social responsibility

  • María Rosario González-Rodríguez
  • María Carmen Díaz-Fernández
  • Marek Pawlak
  • Biagio Simonetti


The findings of this article bring knowledge about the understanding of corporate social responsibility from the university students’ perception and their values’ structure in a cross cultural high education context. Primary data collected via a survey in Business Schools at Universities of Spain, Poland and Bulgaria and multivariate analysis evidence that both the values’ structure and university students’ CSR perception are influenced by cross cultural factors. In this High Education context and according to Schwartz’s values theory and the Triple Bottom line, the study reveals different value profiles by gender and nationality and diverse attitudes to CSR perception across these European countries. The result approached is important for organizations to assure the success of strategic purposes implicit on social corporate initiatives.


Corporate social responsibility Values Cross cultural approach High education University’s students 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agle B.R. et al.: Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance and CEO values. Acad. Manag. J. 42(5), 507–525 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arlow P.: Personal characteristics in college students’ evaluations of business ethics and corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 10, 63–69 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backhaus K.B. et al.: Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Bus. Soc. 41(3), 292–318 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baig E.: America’s most admired corporations. Fortune 115, 18–31 (1987)Google Scholar
  5. Berenheim R.: An outbreak of ethics. Across Board 25, 14–19 (1988)Google Scholar
  6. Betz M., O’Connell L., Shepard J.M.: Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behaviour. J. Bus. Ethics 8, 321–324 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boo E., Koh H.: The influence of organizational and code-supporting variables on the effectiveness of a code of ethics. Teach. Bus. Ethics 5(4), 357–373 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown T.J., Dacin P.A.: The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. J. Mark. 61, 68–84 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrasco I.: Corporate social responsibility, values and cooperation. Int. Adv. Econ. Res. 13(4), 454–60 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. Carroll A.: A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 4, 497–505 (1979)Google Scholar
  11. Chase D., Burns D., Clypool G.: A suggestive ethical framework for evaluating corporate mergers and acquisitions. J. Bus. Ethics 16, 1753–1763 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahlsrud A.: How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 15, 1–13 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeSalvia D., Gemmill G.: An exploratory study of the personal value systems of college students and mangers. Acad. Manag. J. 14, 227–238 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elkington J.: Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. New Society Publishers, Philadelphia (1998)Google Scholar
  15. Elms H.: Corporate (and Stakeholder) responsibility in central and eastern Europe. Int. J. Emerg. Market. 1(3), 147–157 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. Epstein E.M.: The continuing quest for accountable, ethical, and humane corporate capitalism: an enduring challenge for social issues in management in the new millennium. Bus. Soc. 38(3), 253 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ford R., McLaughlin F.: Perceptions of socially responsible activities and attitudes: a comparison of business deans and corporate chief executives. Acad. Manag. J. 27, 666–674 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gamson Z.F.: Higher education and rebuilding civic life. Change 29(1), 10–14 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerde V.W., Wokutch R.E.: 25 Years and going strong. Bus. Soc. 37(4), 414–446 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodman C., Crawford G.: Young executives: A source of new ethics?. Pers. J. 53, 180–187 (1974)Google Scholar
  21. Graafland J.: Modeling the trade-off between profits and principles. De Economist 150(2), 129–154 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Groves C., Frater L., Lee R., Stokes E.: Is there room at the bottom for CSR? Corporate social responsibility and nanotechnology in the UK. J. Bus. Ethics 101, 525–552 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hauser S.M.: Education, ability, and civic engagement in the contemporary United States. So. Sci. Res. 29(4), 556–582 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hillman A.J., Keim G.D.: Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line?. Strateg. Manag. J. 22, 125–139 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hollon C., Ulrich T.: Personal business ethics: managers vs. managers-to-be. South. Bus. Rev. 5, 17–22 (1979)Google Scholar
  26. Hosmer L.: The other 338: Why a majority of our schools of business administration do not offer a course in business ethics. J. Bus. 4, 17–22 (1985)Google Scholar
  27. Husted B., Allen D.: Is it ethical to use ethics as strategy?.  J. Bus. Ethics 27, 21–31 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ibrahim N.A., Angelidis J.P., Howard D.P.: Corporate social responsibility: A comparative analysis of perceptions of practicing accountants and accounting students. J. Bus. Ethics 66, 157–167 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koivula N.: Basic human values in the workplace. Soc. Psychol. Stud. 17, 1–141 (2008)Google Scholar
  30. Kok P., Weile T., McKenna R., Brown A.: A corporate social responsibility audit within a quality management framework. J. Bus. Ethics 31(4), 285–297 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kurtz D.: Commentary on social responsibility and the marketing educator: a discussion document. J. Bus. Ethics 19(2), 207–209 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lampe M.: Increasing effectiveness in teaching ethics to undergraduate business students. Teach. Bus. Ethics 1(1), 3–19 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leitão, J., Silva, M.J.: CSR and social marketing: What is the desired role for Universities in fostering public policies? MPRA Paper No. 2954. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2954/ (2007). Accessed 1 June 2012
  34. Line, M., Braun, R.: Baseline study on CSR practices in the new EU member states and candidates countries. WP. Unitated Nations Development Programme (2007)Google Scholar
  35. Longenecker J., McKinney J., Moore C.: The generation gap in business ethics. Bus. Horiz. 32, 9–14 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maignan I., Ralston D.: Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: insights from businesses self presentations. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 33(3), 497–514 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Margolis J.D., Walsh J.P.: People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
  38. Marin L., Ruiz S.: “I Need You Too” corporate identity attractiveness for consumers and the role of social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 71, 245–260 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marrewijk M.V.: Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion. J. Bus. Ethics 44(2), 95–105 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mattingly J.E., Berman S.L.: Measurement of corporate social action: discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Bus. Soc. 45(1), 20–46 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McGuire J., Sundgren A., Schneeweis T.: Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Acad. Manag. J. 31, 854–872 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McGuire J., Dow S., Argheyd K.: CEO incentives and corporate social performance. J. Bus. Ethics 45(4), 341–359 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McWilliams A., Siegel D.S., Wright M.: Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. J. Manag. Studies 43(1), 1–18 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Melé, D.: Corporate social responsibility in Spain: an overview. WP, no. 543. IESE, Universidad de Navarra, Business School, Barcelona (2004)Google Scholar
  45. Melo T., Garrido-Morgado A.: Corporate reputation: a combination of social responsibility and industry. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 19, 11–31 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mohr L.A., Webb D.J.: The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. J. Consum. Aff. 39(1), 121–147 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Norman W., MacDonald C.: Getting to the bottom of triple bottom line. Bus. Ethics Q. 14(2), 243–262 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pascarella, Ernest~T., Ethington, Corinna~A., Smart, John~C.: The influence of college on humanitarian/civic involvement values. J. High. Educ. 59(4) (1988)Google Scholar
  49. Perrinjaquet A., Furrer O., Usunier J.-C., Cestre G., Valette-Florence P.: A test of the quasi-circumplex structure of human values. J. Res. Personal. 41, 820–840 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pomering A., Johnson L.W: Advertising corporate social responsibility initiatives to communicate corporate image. Inhibiting skepticism to enhance persuasion. Corp. Commun. Intern. J. 14(4), 326–340 (2009)Google Scholar
  51. Posner B., Schmidt W.: Values of the American manager: an update. Calif. Manag. Rev. 26, 206–216 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Quazi A., Brien D.O.: An empirical test of a cross-national model of corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 25(1), 33–51 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramasamy B., Yeung M.: Chinese consumers’ perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR). J. Bus. Ethics 88, 119–132 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roman R., Hayibor S., Agle B.: The relationship between social and financial performance. Bus. Soc. 38, 109–125 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruegger Rugger D., King E.W.: A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. J. Bus. Ethics 11, 179–186 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schmeltz L.: Consumer-orientated CSR communication: Focusing on ability or morality?.  Corp. Commun. Int. J. 17(1), 29–49 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schwartz S.H., Bilsky W.: Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 53(3), 550–562 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schwartz S.H., Bilsky W.: Toward a theory of the universal structure and content of values: extensions and cross-cultural replications. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 58(5), 878–891 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schwartz S.H.: Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zonna, M.P. (eds) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 1–66. Academic Press, San Diego (1992)Google Scholar
  60. Schwartz S.H.: Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. J. Soc. Issues 50(4), 19–45 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schwartz S.H., Melech G., Lehmann A., Burgess S., Harris M.: Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. J. Cross-Cult. Psicol. 32, 519–542 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schwartz S.H., Boehnke K.: Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. J. Res. Personal. 38(3), 230–255 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scott W., Mitchell T.: The moral failure of management education. Chron. High. Educ. 31, 35 (1985)Google Scholar
  64. Sen S., Bhattacharya C.B.: Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Mark. Res. 38(May), 235–243 (2001)Google Scholar
  65. Stead B., Miller J.: Can Social awareness be increased through business curricula?. J. Bus. Ethics 7, 553–560 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stevens G.: Ethical inclinations of tomorrow’s citizens: Actions speak louder?.  J. Bus. Educ. 59, 147–152 (1984)Google Scholar
  67. Tichy G.: What do we know about success or failure of mergers?. J. Ind. Compet. Trade 1(4), 347–394 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Twenge J.M.: Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled—and More Miserable Than Ever Before. Free Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  69. Ullman A.: Date in search of a theory: a critical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 10, 540–577 (1985)Google Scholar
  70. Varadarajan C.B., Menon A.: Cause related marketing: a coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philosophy. J. Mark. 52, 58–74 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Waddock S.A., Graves S.B.: The corporate social performance— financial social link. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(4), 303–319 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wang L., Juslin H.: Values and corporate social responsibility perceptions of Chinese University students. J. Acad. Ethics 10, 57–82 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weber J., Glyptis S.M.: Measuring the impact of a business ethics course and community service experience on students’ values and opinions. Teach. Bus. Ethics 4, 341–358 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weber P.S., Weber J.E., Sleeper B.J., Schneider K.C.: Self-efficacy toward service, civic participation and the business student: scale development and validation. J. Bus. Ethics 49, 359–369 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Woodrow J.E.: A comparison of four computer attitude scales. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 7, 165–187 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zenisek T.J.: Corporate social responsibility: a conceptualization based on organizational literature. Acad. Manag. Rev. 4(3), 359–368 (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Rosario González-Rodríguez
    • 1
  • María Carmen Díaz-Fernández
    • 1
  • Marek Pawlak
    • 2
  • Biagio Simonetti
    • 3
  1. 1.University of SevilleSevilleSpain
  2. 2.The John Paul II University of LublinLublinPoland
  3. 3.University of SannioBeneventoItaly

Personalised recommendations