Quality & Quantity

, Volume 47, Issue 6, pp 3261–3276 | Cite as

Opening up open-ended survey data using qualitative software

Article

Abstract

This article considers the contribution that qualitative software can make to ‘opening up’ open-ended question (‘OEQ’) data from surveys. While integrating OEQ data with the analysis of fixed response items is a challenge, it is also an endeavour for which qualitative software offers considerable support. For survey researchers who wish to derive more analytic value from OEQ data, qualitative software can be a useful resource. We profile the systematic use of qualitative software for such purposes, and the procedures and practical considerations involved. The discussion is illustrated by examples derived from a survey dataset relating to environmental risk in the UK.

Keywords

Open ended questions Survey methods Qualitative software Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fielding J., Gray K., Burningham K., Thrush D.: Flood Warning for Vulnerable Groups: Secondary analysis of flood data. Environment Agency R D Report W5C-018/2. Environment Agency, Bristol (2005)Google Scholar
  2. Fielding N.: Going out on a limb: postmodernism and multiple method research. Current Sociol. 57, 427–447 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frisbie B., Sudman S.: The use of computers in coding free responses. Publ. Opin. Q. 32, 216–232 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Giorgetti D., Sebastiani F.: Automating survey coding by multiclass text categorization techniques. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54, 1269–1277 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glaser B., Strauss A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine, Chicago (1967)Google Scholar
  6. Higgins S., Ford K., Oberski I.: Computer-Aided Qualitative Analysis of Interview Data. British Educational Research Conference. Lancaster, UK (1996)Google Scholar
  7. Miles M.B.: Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: the problem of analysis. Adm. Sci. Q. 24, 590–601 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Montgomery A.C., Crittenden K.S.: Improving coding reliability for open-ended questions. Publ. Opin. Q. 41, 235–243 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schmidt M.: Quantification of transcripts from depth interviews, open-ended responses and focus groups: Challenges, accomplishments, new applications and perspectives for market research. Int. J. Market Res. 52, 483–509 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations