Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 1167–1180 | Cite as

Measure of privacy in randomized response model

  • Hong Zhimin
  • Yan Zaizai
Article

Abstract

Randomized response (say, RR) techniques on survey are used for collecting data on sensitive issues while trying to protect the respondents’ privacy. The degree of confidentiality will clearly determine whether or not respondents choose to cooperate. There have been many proposals for privacy measures with very different implications for an optimal model design. These derived measures of protection privacy involve both conditional probabilities of being perceived as belonging to sensitive group, denoted as P(A|yes) and P(A|no). In this paper, we introduce an alternative criterion to measure privacy protection and reconsider and compare some RR models in the light of the efficiency/protection privacy. This measure is known to the respondents before they agree to use the RR model. This measure is helpful for choosing an optimal RR model in practice.

Keywords

Randomized response sampling Sensitive questions Privacy protection measure Efficiency Design parameter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson H.: Estimation of proportion through randomized response. Int. Stat. Rev. 44, 213–217 (1977)Google Scholar
  2. Fligner M.A., Policello G.E. II, Singh J.: A comparison of two randomized response survey method with consideration for the level of respondent protection. Commun. Stat. A 6, 1511–1524 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hong Z.M., Yan Z.Z.: Efficiency comparison of randomized response strategies under the same level of respondent protection. J. Eng. Math. (in Chinese) 25, 97–102 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. Horvitz, D.G., Shah, B.V., Simmons, W.R.: The unrelated question randomized response model. In: Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 65–72 (1967)Google Scholar
  5. Kuk A.Y.C.: Asking sensitive questions indirectly. Biometrika 77, 436–443 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lanke J.: On the degree of protection in randomized interviews. Int. Stat. Rev. 44, 197–203 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leysieffer R.W., Warner S.L.: Respondent jeopardy and optimal design in randomized response models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 71, 649–656 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mangat N.S.: An improved randomized response strategy. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 56, 93–95 (1994)Google Scholar
  9. Mangat N.S., Singh R.: An alternative randomized response procedure. Biometrika 77, 436–438 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nayak T.K.: On randomized response surveys for estimating a proportion. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 23, 3303–3321 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Warner S.L.: Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 60, 63–69 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Yan Z.Z., Nie Z.K.: A fair comparison of the randomized response strategies. Acta Mathematica Scientia A (in Chinese) 24, 362–368 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsScience College of Inner Mongolia University of TechnologyHohhotChina

Personalised recommendations