Quality & Quantity

, Volume 47, Issue 5, pp 2829–2846 | Cite as

Trust and corruption: The influence of positive and negative social capital on the economic development in the European Union

Article

Abstract

Why are the Scandinavian countries in the European Union significantly richer than Southern/Eastern European countries? We try to answer this question from an empirical social capital perspective. In particular, we are interested in the interplay of social trust as a positive and corruption as a negative manifestation of social capital. The opportunities to provide answers by multivariate modelling are, however, limited by several problems related to small sample size and low degrees of freedom. Regarding these problems, we test the interrelating influences between positive and negative social capital by applying a path model that accounts for Granger-like causal effects. Our empirical results, referring to a sample of up to 25 EU countries, show that corruption might harm poor European countries but is not able to affect social trust. However, corruption in itself means that resources end up in the wrong places and not in socioeconomically optimal investments. There is, therefore, a direct damaging effect of corruption on wealth. This implies that economic actors have to invest higher transaction and control costs which will bind resources to non-productive purposes and thus destroy economic wealth. Most remarkable is that the augmentation of positive social capital could work as an effective counterforce to corruption, even if it does not compensate for the economic loss caused by corruption. Thus, adding the social capital perspective may contribute to understanding present day variation in the wealth of European nations by the damaging effect of corrupt activities and/or the positive force of social trust.

Keywords

Social capital Corruption Trust Path model Granger causality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson C.J., Tverdova Y.V.: Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. Am. J. Political Sci. 47(1), 91–109 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardhan P.: Corruption and development: a review of issues. J. Econ. Lit. 35, 1320–1346 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A.: The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 1173–1182 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjørnskov, C.: Investigations in the economics of social capital. PhD Dissertation, Aarhus School of Business (2005)Google Scholar
  5. Blackburn K., Bose N., Haque M.E.: The incidence and persistence of corruption in economic development. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 30, 2447–2467 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowler S., Karp J.A.: Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political Behav. 26(3), 271–287 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang E.C., Chu Y.: Corruption and trust: exceptionalism in Asian democracies. J. Politics 68, 259–271 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen J., Cohen P.: Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Science. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2003)Google Scholar
  9. Coleman J.S.: Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94, 95–121 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coleman J.S.: Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  11. Della Porta D.: Social capital, beliefs in government and political corruption. In: Pharr, S.J., Putnam, R.D. (eds.) Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, pp. 202–230. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2000)Google Scholar
  12. Della Porta D., Vannucci A.: Corrupt Exchanges: Actors, Resources, and Mechanisms of Political Corruption. Aldine, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  13. Doig A., Theobald R.: Corruption & Democratisation. Cass, Frank Publishers, London (2000)Google Scholar
  14. Goodman L.A.: On the exact variance of products. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 55, 708–713 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graeff P.: Why should one trust in corruption? The linkage between corruption, norms and social capital. In: Graf Lambsdorff, J., Taube, M., Schramm, M. (eds.) The New Institutional Economics of Corruption, pp. 21–42. Routledge, London (2005)Google Scholar
  16. Graeff P.: Social capital: the dark side. In: Svendsen, G.T., Svendsen, G.L. (eds.) Handbook of Social Capital. The Troika of Sociology, Political Science and Economics, pp. 17–35. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2009)Google Scholar
  17. Granger C.W.J.: Investing causal relations by econometric methods and spectral methods. Econometrica 34, 424–438 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heidenheimer A.J.: The topography of corruption: explorations in a comparative perspective. Int. Soc. Sci. J. 158, 337–347 (1996)Google Scholar
  19. Hetherington M.: The political relevance of political trust. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 92(4), 791–808 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jorgenson D.W.: Productivity and economic growth. In: Ernst, R.B., Triplett, J.E. (eds.) Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, pp. 19–118. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991)Google Scholar
  21. Kline R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  22. La Porta R., Lopez-De Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R.W.: Trust in large organizations. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 137(2), 333–338 (1997)Google Scholar
  23. Lütkepohl H.: New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mauro P.: Corruption and growth. Q. J. Econ. 110, 681–712 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCann J.A., Domínguez J.I.: Mexicans react to political corruption and electoral fraud: an assessment of public opinion and voting behavior. Elect. Stud. 17(4), 483–504 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller A.H., Listhaug O.: Political performance and institutional trust. In: Norris, P. (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, pp. 204–216. Oxford University Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  27. Morris S.D., Klesner J.L.: Corruption and trust: theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comp. Political Stud. 43(10), 1258–1285 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neumann R., Graeff P.: A multi trait multi method approach to pinpoint the validity of aggregated governance indicators. Qual. Quant. 44, 849–864 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Connor S., Fischer R.: Predicting societal corruption across time: values, wealth, or institutions?. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. XX(X), 1–16 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. Ostrom E., Ahn T.K.: The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action. In: Svendsen, G.T., Svendsen, G.L. (eds.) Handbook of Social Capital. The Troika of Sociology, Political Science and Economics, pp. 17–35. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2009)Google Scholar
  31. Paldam M.: The Nordic welfare state—success under stress. Eur. J. Political Econ. 20, 739–742 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paldam M., Svendsen G.T.: An essay on social capital: looking for the fire behind the smoke. Eur. J. Political Econ. 16, 339–366 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pharr S.J.: Officials’ misconduct and public distrust: Japan and the trilateral democracies. In: Pharr, S.J., Putnam, R.D. (eds.) Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Democracies?, pp. 173–201. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2000)Google Scholar
  34. Putnam R.D.: Making Democracy Work, Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993)Google Scholar
  35. Putnam R.D.: Bowling Alone—The Collapse and revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  36. Ramsey J.B.: Tests for specification errors in classical linear least squares regression analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 31(2), 350–371 (1969)Google Scholar
  37. Rose R.: Getting things done in an anti-modern society: social capital networks in Russia. In: Dasgupta, P., Serageldin, I. (eds.) Social Capital, A Multifaceted Perspective, The World Bank, Washington, DC (2000)Google Scholar
  38. Rothstein B., Eek D.: Political corruption and social trust. Ration. Soc. 21(1), 81–111 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sah, R.K.: Persistence and pervasiveness of corruption: new perspectives. Yale Economic Growth Research Centre Discussion Paper No. 560.48 (1988)Google Scholar
  40. Schjødt E.B., Svendsen G.T.: Transition to market economy in Eastern Europe: interest groups and political institutions in Russia. Nordic J. Political Econ. 28(2), 181–194 (2002)Google Scholar
  41. Seligson M.A.: The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: a comparative study of four Latin American countries. J. Politics 64, 408–433 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Svendsen, G.L.H., Svendsen, G.T.: The wealth of nations: bourdieuconomics and social capital. Theory Soc. 32(5/6) (special double issue in memory of Pierre Bourdieu), 607–631 (2003)Google Scholar
  43. Svendsen G.T., Svendsen G.L.H.: Social capital and the welfare state. In: Böss, M. (ed.) The Nation State in Transformation, pp. 315–339. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus (2010)Google Scholar
  44. Tanzi V.: Corruption: arm’s-length relationships and markets. In: Fiorentini, G., Peltzman, S. (eds.) The Economics of Organised Crime, pp. 161–182. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Uslaner E.M.: The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  46. Uslaner, E.M.: Where you stand depends upon where your grandparents sat: the inheritability of generalized trust. Working paper, University of Maryland, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  47. Uslaner E.M.: Corruption. In: Svendsen, G.T., Svendsen, G.L.H. (eds.) The Handbook on Social Capital, pp. 127–142. Edward Elgar, London (2009)Google Scholar
  48. Weber, M.: The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Allen and Unwin, London [1906] (1930)Google Scholar
  49. Whiteley P.F.: Economic growth and social capital. Political Stud. 48(3), 443–466 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xin X., Ruden T.K.: The context for political corruption: a cross-national analysis. Soc. Sci. Q. 85(2), 294–309 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fachbereich GesellschaftswissenschaftenGoethe University Frankfurt am MainFrankfurt am MainGermany
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of AarhusAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations