Quality & Quantity

, Volume 47, Issue 5, pp 2709–2722

A comparative analysis on school attainment in Turkey and Malta: application of the Tobit model



This research provides a comparative analysis on the correlates of school attainment between Turkish and Maltese people. In the analysis, school attainment is measured by years of education. Tobit model estimates are obtained in the analyses using Eurobarometer 2004.1 data set. The results of the model demonstrate that, the effect of marriage on school attainment found to be insignificant for Malta while it is significant for Turkey. Additionally, it can be seen that females are less educated than males and income has a positive effect on school attainment in both Turkey and Malta. By providing comparative analyses, this research attempts to give insights for policy makers and professionals to improve the Turkish education system.


Comparative education Educational policy School attainment Tobit model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aksit N.: Educational reform in Turkey. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 27, 129–137 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amemiya T.: Tobit Models: A survey. J. Econom. 24, 3–61 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Annual Reports of Government Departments, http://www.education.gov.mt/ministry/doc/pdf/annual_reports/en/ministry_of_education2003.pdf (accessed July 22, 2008) (2003)
  4. Arabmazar A., Schmidt P.: Further evidence on the robustness of the tobit estimator to heteroskedasticity. J. Econom. 17, 253–258 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basic education in Turkey: background report, Reviews of National policies for education. http://ocde.p4.siteinternet.com/publications/doifiles/912007011DOI.pdf (accessed June 15, 2008) (2005)
  6. Boissiere, M.: Determinants of primary education outcomes in developing countries. The World Bank Operations Evaluation Department. http://www.worldbank.org/oed/education/documents/education_primary_determinants_paper.pdf (accessed June 25, 2008) (2004)
  7. Borahan N.G., Ziarati R.: Developing a system of quality assurance for the higher education sector in Turkey. Dogus Univ. J. 1, 18–27 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. Demir C.E., Paykoç F.: Challenges of primary education in Turkey: priorities of parents and professionals. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 26, 640–654 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dumas, C., Lambert, S.: Patterns of intergenerational transmission of education: the case of Senegal. Centre of Economic Performance http://cep.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/28-03-06-DUM.pdf (accessed June 22, 2008) (2005)
  10. Education Reform Initiative. http://ipc.sabanciuniv.edu/eng/Yayinlar/documents/EducationReformInitiative.pdf (accessed August 15 (2008)
  11. Education Statistics of Turkey, 2005–2006, ISBN 975-112704-1Google Scholar
  12. Flabbi, L., Paternostro, S., Tiongson, E.R.: Returns to education in the economic transition: a systematic assessment using comparable data. World Bank Policy Research. Working Paper, No: 4225 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. GanzeboomH.G. Nieuwbeerta P.: Access to education in six Eastern European countries between 1940 and 1985. Results of a cross-national survey. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 32, 339–357 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gujarati D.N.: Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  15. Holmes, J.: Measuring the determinants of school completion in Pakistan: analysis of censoring and selection bias. Center Discussion Paper 794 (1999)Google Scholar
  16. Jayachandran, U.: Socio-economic determinants of school attendance in India. Working Paper 103, Centre for Development Economics (2002)Google Scholar
  17. Judge G.G., Hill R.C., Griffits W.E., Lütkepohl H., Lee T.C.: Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics. Wiley, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  18. Long J.S.: Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1997)Google Scholar
  19. Maddala G.S.: Introduction to Econometrics. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  20. Malta?! A guide to education and vocational training: http://www.education.gov.mt/edu/edu_07.htm. (accessed June 20, 2008) (1988)
  21. Olsen R.J.: A note on the uniqueness of maximum likelihood estimator for the tobit model. Econometrica 46, 1211–1215 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pultar G., Kırtunç A.L.: Cultural studies in Turkey: Education and practice. Rev. Educ. Pedagogy Cult. Stud. 26, 129–153 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramanathan R.: Introductory Econometrics with Applications. The Dryden Press, San Diego (1998)Google Scholar
  24. Smits J., Hoşgör A.G.: Effects of family background characteristics on educational participation in Turkey. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 26, 545–560 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Structures of Education, vocational training and adult education systems in Europe, Directorate-General for education and culture. http://www.eurydice.org/ressources/eurydice/pdf/041DN/041_MT_EN.pdf (accessed July 11, 2008) (2003)
  26. Sultana, R.G.: The secondary education certificate and matriculation examinations in Malta: A case study. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001247/124790e.pdf (accessed July 2, 2008) (1999)
  27. Tansel A.: Determinants of school attainment of boys and girls in Turkey: Individual, household and community factors. Econ. Educ. Rev. 21, 455–470 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tansel A., Bircan F.: Demand for education in Turkey: a tobit analysis of private tutoring expenditure. Econ. Educ. Rev. 25, 303–313 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. The Eurobarometer Survey Series, Candidate Countries Eurobarometer 2004.1Google Scholar
  30. The Turkish education system and developments in education. International Bureau of Education. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE/natrap/Turkey.pdf (accessed July 5, 2008) (2001)
  31. Tobin J.: Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica 26, 24–36 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wooldridge J.M.: Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Pres, Massachusetts (2002)Google Scholar
  33. Wößmann L.: Returns to education in Europe. Rev. World Econ. 139, 348–376 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative SciencesCelal Bayar UniversityManisaTurkey

Personalised recommendations