Quality & Quantity

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 1665–1685 | Cite as

From network ties to network structures: Exponential Random Graph Models of interorganizational relations

  • Francesca Pallotti
  • Alessandro LomiEmail author
  • Daniele Mascia


Theoretical accounts of network ties between organizations emphasize the interdependence of individual intentions, opportunities, and actions embedded in local configurations of network ties. These accounts are at odds with empirical models based on assumptions of independence between network ties. As a result, the relation between models for network ties and the observed network structure of interorganizational fields is problematic. Using original fieldwork and data that we have collected on collaborative network ties within a regional community of hospital organizations we estimate newly developed specifications of Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGM) that help to narrow the gap between theories and empirical models of interorganizational networks. After controlling for the main factors known to affect partner selection decisions, full models in which local dependencies between network ties are appropriately specified outperform restricted models in which such dependencies are left unspecified and only controlled for statistically. We use computational methods to show that networks based on empirical estimates produced by models accounting for local network dependencies reproduce with accuracy salient features of the global network structure that was actually observed. We show that models based on assumptions of independence between network ties do not. The results of the study suggest that mechanisms behind the formation of network ties between organizations are local, but their specification and identification depends on an accurate characterization of network structure. We discuss the implications of this view for current research on interorganizational networks, communities, and fields.


Interorganizational networks Interorganizational relations Exponential Random Graph Models Hospital organizations 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahuja G., Polidoro F. Jr, Mitchell W.: Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 30, 941–958 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahuja, G., Soda, G., Zaheer, A.: The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organ. Sci. (2011) (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  3. Baum J.A.C., Singh J.V.: Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational mortality. Am. J. Sociol. 100, 346–380 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum J.A.C., Shipilov A.V., Rowley T.J.: Where do small worlds come from?. Ind. Corp. Change 12, 697–725 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum J.A.C, Cowan R., Jonard N.: Network-independent partner selection and the evolution of innovation networks. Manag. Sci. 56, 2094–2110 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bearman P.: Generalized exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 102, 1383–1415 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beckman C.M., Haunschild P.R., Phillips D.J.: Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. 15, 259–275 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boorman S.A., White H.C.: Social structure from multiple networks. II. Role Structures. Am. J. Sociol. 81, 1384–1446 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brass D.J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H.R., Tsai W.: Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 47, 795–817 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Britton T., Deijfen M., Martin-Löf A.: Generating simple random graphs with prescribed degree distribution. J. Stat. Phys. 124, 1377–1397 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cropper S., Ebers M., Huxham C., Smith Ring P.: The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations. Oxford University Press, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahlander, L., McFarland, D.A.: Intellectual tie formation: multiple networks and refunctionality. Working Paper, Stanford University (2009)Google Scholar
  13. Davis G.F., Yoo M., Baker W.E.: The small world of the American Corporate Elite, 1982–2001. Strateg. Organ. 8, 43–68 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. Epstein J.M.: Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)Google Scholar
  15. Fennell M.L.: The effects of environmental characteristics on the structure of hospital clusters. Adm. Sci. Q. 25, 485–510 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerlach M.L.: The Japanese corporate network: a blockmodel analysis. Adm. Sci. Q. 37, 105–139 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodreau S.M.: Advances in Exponential Random Graph (p*) models applied to a large social network. Soc. Netw. 29, 231–248 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greve H.R.: Interorganizational learning and heterogeneous social structure. Organ. Stud. 26, 1025–1047 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gulati R., Gargiulo M.: Where do interorganizational networks come from?. Am. J. Sociol. 104, 1439–1493 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunter D.R.: Curved exponential family models for social networks. Soc. Netw. 29, 216–230 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunter D.R., Handcock M.S.: Inference in curved exponential family models for networks. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 15, 565–583 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunter D.R., Goodreau S., Handcock M.: Goodness of fit of social network models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 103, 248–258 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iwashyna T.J., Christie J.D., Kahn J.M., David A.: Uncharted paths: hospital networks in critical care. Chest 135, 827–833 (2009a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iwashyna T.J., Jason D.C., Moody J., Kahn J.M., Asch D.A.: The structure of critical care transfer networks. Med. Care 47, 787–793 (2009b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kogut B., Walker G.: The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. Am. Sociol. Rev. 66, 317–335 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Larson A.: Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of the governance of exchange relationships. Adm. Sci. Q. 37, 76–104 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laumann P., Marsden P.V.: Microstructural analysis of interorganizational systems. Soc. Netw. 4, 329–348 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lazega E., Pattson P.E.: Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study. Soc. Netw. 21, 67–90 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee B.Y., McGlone S.M., Song Y., Avery T.R., Eubank S., Chang C.-C., Bailey R.R., Wagener D.K., Burke D.S., Platt R., Huang S.S.: Social network analysis of patient sharing among hospitals in Orange County, California. Am. J. Public Health 4, 707–713 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lomi A., Pattison P.: Manufacturing relations: an empirical study of the organization of production across multiple networks. Organ. Sci. 17, 313–332 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lubbers M:J., Snijders T.A.B.: A comparison of various approaches to the exponential random graph model: a reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes. Soc. Netw. 29, 489–507 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., Robins, G.: Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks. 2012. Theory, Methods and Applications. New York. Cambridge University Press. (Forthcoming)Google Scholar
  33. Macy M.W., Willer R.: From factors to actors: computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28, 143–166 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Milo R., Shen-Orr S., Itzkovitz S., Kashtan N., Chklovskii D., Alon U.: Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298, 824–827 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitsuhashi H., Greve H.: A matching theory of alliance formation and compatibility. Acad. Manag. J. 52, 975–995 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newman M.E.J.: Assortative mixing in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 208701 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Newman M.E.J.: The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45, 167–256 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Newman M.E.J., Park J.: Why social networks are different from other types of networks. Phys. Rev. E 68, 036122 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pachucki M.A., Breiger R.L.: Cultural holes: Beyond relationality in social networks and culture. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36, 205–224 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pattison P.: Algebraic Models for Social Networks. Cambridge University Press, New York (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pattison P., Robins G.: Neighborhood-based models for social networks. Sociol. Methodol. 32, 301–337 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Picardi C., Calatroni L., Bertoni F.: Communities in Italian corporate networks. Physica A 389, 5247–5258 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Podolny J.M.: Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)Google Scholar
  44. Powell W.W., Koput K.W., White D.R., Owen-Smith J.: Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 1132–1205 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Provan K.G., Milward H.B.: A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: a comparative study of four community mental health systems. Adm. Sci. Q. 40, 1–33 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Provan K.G., Milward H.B.: Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public sector organizational networks. Public Adm. Rev. 61, 414–423 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Provan K.G., Fish A., Sydow J.: Interorganizational networks at the network level: a review of the empirical literature on whole networks. J. Manag. 33, 479–513 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rivera M.T., Soderstrom S.B., Uzzi B.: Dynamics of dyads in social networks: assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36, 91–115 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robins G., Alexander M.: Small worlds among interlocking directors: network structure and distance in bipartite graphs. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 10, 69–94 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robins G.L., Pattison P., Woolcock J.: Small and other worlds: Global network structures from local processes. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 894–936 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robins G.L., Snijders T.A.B., Wang P., Handcock M., Pattison P.: Recent developments in Exponential Random Graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc. Netw. 29, 192–215 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Robins G., Pattison P., Wang P.: Closure, connectivity, and degree distributions: Exponential Random Graph (p*) models for directed social networks. Soc. Netw. 31, 105–117 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ruef M., Scott W.R.: A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Adm. Sci. Q. 43, 877–904 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scott W.R., Meyer J.W.: The organization of societal sectors. In: Meyer, J.W., Scott, W.R. (eds) Organizational Environments: Rituals and Rationality, pp. 129–153. Sage, Newbury Park (1983)Google Scholar
  55. Snijders T.A.B.: Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of exponential random graph models. J. Soc. Struct. 3, 1–41 (2002)Google Scholar
  56. Pattison P.E., Robins G.L., Handcock M.S.: New specifications for Exponential Random Graph Models. Sociol. Methodol. 36, 99–153 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sohn M-W.: Distance and cosine measures of niche overlap. Soc. Netw. 23, 141–165 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sohn M-W.: A relational approach to measuring competition among hospitals. Health Serv. Res. 37, 457–483 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sorenson O., Stuart T.E.: Bringing the context back in: settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investing. Adm. Sci. Q. 53, 266–294 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stuart T.E.: Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Adm. Sci. Q. 43, 668–698 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stuart T.E.: The formation of Inter-organizational networks. In: James, R. (eds) The Missing Links: Formation and Decay of Economic Networks, Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  62. Stuart T.E., Yim S.: Board interlocks and the propensity to be targeted in private equity transactions. J. Financ. Econ. 97, 174–189 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thompson J.D.: Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  64. Trapido D.: Competitive embeddedness and the emergence of interfirm cooperation. Soc. Forces 86, 167–191 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Uzzi B.: The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61, 674–698 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Uzzi B., Lancaster R.: Relational embeddedness and learning: the case of bank loan managers and their clients. Manag. Sci. 49, 383–399 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vande Bunt G.G., Groenewegen P.: An actor-oriented dynamic network approach: the case of interorganizational network evolution. Organ. Res. Methods 10, 463–482 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wasserman S., Pattison P.E.: Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: an introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika 61, 401–425 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wasserman S., Robins G.L.: An introduction to random graphs, dependence graphs, and p*. In: Carrington, P.J., Scott, J., Wasserman, S. (eds) Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, pp. 148–161. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Watts D.J., Strogatz SH.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 4, 440–442 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Westphal J.D., Zajak E.J.: Defections from the inner circle: social exchange, reciprocity, and the diffusion of board independence in U.S. corporations. Adm. Sci. Q. 42, 161–183 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. White H.C., Breiger R.L.: Pattern across networks. Society 12, 68–74 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. White H.C., Boorman S.A., Breiger R.L.: Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. Am. J. Sociol. 81, 730–780 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesca Pallotti
    • 1
  • Alessandro Lomi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniele Mascia
    • 2
  1. 1.University of LuganoLuganoSwitzerland
  2. 2.Catholic University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations