Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 1287–1314 | Cite as

National minorities and their representation in social surveys: which practices make a difference?

  • Francesco Laganà
  • Guy Elcheroth
  • Sandra Penic
  • Brian Kleiner
  • Nicole Fasel
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic study of survey mechanisms that produce or reduce minority bias in social surveys. It extends the work of Lipps et al. (2011) who have demonstrated that, in the Swiss context, the more an ethno-national minority community differs, socio-culturally and socio-economically, from the national majority, the less it is likely to be represented in its proper proportion in the major national surveys. Minority bias furthermore has a vertical dimension: socio-economic bias against individuals from the most deprived backgrounds becomes extreme within ethno-national minority communities. Using data from the Swiss Labour Force Survey, the Swiss Household Panel, and the Swiss sample of the European Social Survey, in the present work we empirically assess the impact of three types of survey practices on minority bias: (1) strategies to increase overall response rates of the whole population indiscriminately from its minority status, (2) the use of pre- and post-stratification measures that take into account the overall share of foreigners in the national population, and (3) the conduct of interviews in a wider range of languages, in order to facilitate survey response among certain (linguistic) minorities. Our findings show that efforts to increase overall response rates can, paradoxically, create even more minority bias. On the other hand, they suggest that a combination of stratified sampling and a wider range of survey languages can have a positive effect in reducing survey bias, both between and within national categories. We conclude that measures that take into account and adapt to the social and cultural heterogeneity of surveyed populations do make a difference, whereas additional efforts that only replicate existing routine practices can be counter-productive.

Keywords

Survey Methodology Sampling bias Ethno-national minorities Response rates Survey languages Stratified sampling 

Abbreviations

SLFS

Swiss Labour Force Survey

SHP

Swiss Household Panel

ESS

European Social Survey

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Billig M.: Banal Nationalism. Sage, London (1995)Google Scholar
  2. Camarota, S., Capizzano, J.: Assessing the Quality of Data Collected on the Foreign Born: An Evaluation of the American Community Survey (ACS). Technical Report, Center for Immigration Studies, Washington (2004)Google Scholar
  3. Castles S., Miller J.M.: The Age of Migrations. 2nd edn. MacMillan Press Ltd., Basingstoke (1993)Google Scholar
  4. Deding M., Fridberg T., Jakobsen V.: Non-response in a survey among immigrants in Denmark. Surv. Res. Methods 2(3), 107–121 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. Eisner M., Ribeaud D.: Conducting a criminological survey in a cultural diverse context: lessons from the Zurich Project on the social development of children. Eur. J. Criminol. 4(3), 271–298 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feskens R., Hox J., Lensvelt-Mulders G., Schmeets H.: Collecting data among ethnic minorities in an international perspective. Field Methods 18(3), 284–304 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feskens R., Hox J., Lensvelt-Mulders G., Schmeets H.: Non-response among ethnic minorities: a multivariate analysis. J. Off. Stat. 23(3), 387–408 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. Gross, D.: Immigration policy and foreign population in Switzerland. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3853 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Groves R.M.: Nonreponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin. Q. 70(5), 646–675 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jakobsen, V.: Young immigrants from the former Yugoslavia, Turkey and Pakistan: educational attainment, wages and employment. PhD thesis, Department of Economics, Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus (2004)Google Scholar
  11. Koser K., Lutz H.: The new migrations in Europe. Social Construction and Social Realities. MacMillan, London (1998)Google Scholar
  12. Lipps O., Pollien A.: Effects of interviewer experience on components of nonresponse in the European Social Survey. Field Methods. 23(2), 156–172 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lipps, O., Laganà, F., Pollien, A., Gianettoni, L.: National minorities and their representation in Swiss surveys (I): Providing evidence and analyzing causes for their under-representation. FORS Working Paper Series, paper 2011–2. FORS, Lausanne (2011)Google Scholar
  14. Nielsen, N.K., Pedersen, S.: Databeskrivelse (in Danish). In: Mogensen, G.V., Matthiesen, P.C. (eds.) Integration i Danmark omkring årtusindeskiftet. The Rockwool Foundation Research Unit, University of Aarhus Publisher, Aarhus (2000)Google Scholar
  15. Peracchi, F., Depalo, D.: Labor market outcomes of natives and immigrants: evidence from the ECHP. Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0615, World Bank, Washington (2006)Google Scholar
  16. Peytchev A., Baxter R., Carley-Baxter L.: Not all survey effort is equal. Reduction of nonresponse bias and nonresponse error. Public Opin. Q. 73(4), 785–806 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Piguet E.: L’immigration en Suisse. Cinquante ans d’entreouverture. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne (2004)Google Scholar
  18. Plaza S., Graf E.: Reccomandations et Exemples Pratiques Concernant l’application des Pondérations. Panel Suisse de Manages, Neuchâtel (2007)Google Scholar
  19. Plaza, S., Graf, E.: Executive summary. Recommendations and practical examples for using weighting. FORS, Lausanne (2008)Google Scholar
  20. Widmer R.F.: L’enquête Suisse sur la Population Active, Concepts—Bases Méthodologiques, Considérations Pratiques. Office Fédérale de la Statistique, Neuchâtel (2004)Google Scholar
  21. Wimmer A., Schiller N.: Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation state building, migration and the social sciences. Glob. Netw. 2(4), 301–334 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Laganà
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guy Elcheroth
    • 1
  • Sandra Penic
    • 1
  • Brian Kleiner
    • 2
  • Nicole Fasel
    • 3
  1. 1.Life Course and Inequalities Research Center (LINES), Institute of Social SciencesUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.FORS – Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social SciencesLausanneSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Social PsychologyUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations