Quality & Quantity

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 1067–1089 | Cite as

Tackling connections, structure, and meaning in networks: quantitative and qualitative methods in sociological network research

Article
First Online:

Abstract

The paper systematizes the role of qualitative methods, statistical analyses, and formal network analysis in sociological network research, and argues for their systematic combination. Formal network analysis mainly aims at a description of network structures as well as at an explanation of the behavior of the network at the systemic level. Formal network analysis can also be used in order to explain individual behavior or the existence of individual connections from network structure. Statistical analyses of ego-centered networks are used to correlate individual attributes with the structure and composition of the individual embeddedness, thus providing a statistical explanation of network effects and determinants. Qualitative methods are important for exploring network structures, and for understanding the meaning connected to them. A historical overview shows that these three strands have long co-existed in sociological network research without engaging in combined research efforts. Combinations of these methods prove useful when considering the various aspects of networks (individual connections, structural patterns, and meaning).

Keywords

Social network analysis Culture Meaning Relational sociology Qualitative methods 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott A.: Transcending general linear reality. Sociol. Theory 6, 169–188 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott A.: Of time and space: the contemporary relevance of the Chicago school. Soc. Forces 75(4), 1149–1182 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anheier H.K., Gerhards J., Romo F.: Forms of capital and social structure in cultural fields: examining Bourdieu’s social topography. Am. J. Sociol. 100(4), 859–903 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baerveldt C., Zijlstra B., Wolf M.d., Rossem R.v., Duijn M.v.: Ethnic boundaries in high school students’ networks in Flanders and the Netherlands. Int. Sociol. 22, 701–720 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker W.E.: The social structure of a national securities market. Am. J. Sociol. 89(4), 775–811 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes J.A.: Class and committees in a Norwegian Island Parish. Hum. Relat. 7, 39–58 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bearman P., Parigi P.: Cloning headless frogs and other important matters: conversation topics and network structure. Social Forces 83, 535–557 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bellotti E.: What are friends for? Elective communities of single people. Social Netw. 30(4), 318–329 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bellotti, E.: Comment on Nick Crossley/1. Sociologica (2010). doi: 10.2383/32050
  10. Benjamin B., Podolny J.M.: Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Adm. Sci. Q. 44(3), 563–589 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernard, H.R.: Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Altamira, Lanham (2006)Google Scholar
  12. Bott E.: Family and Social Network. Tavistock, London (1957)Google Scholar
  13. Bowker G., Star S.L.: Sorting Things Out. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  14. Breiger R.L.: The analysis of social networks. In: Hardy, M., Bryman, A. (eds) Handbook of Data Analysis, pp. 505–526. Sage, London (2004)Google Scholar
  15. Breiger R.L., Boorman S., Arabie P.: An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. J. Math. Psychol. 12, 328–383 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brint S.: Hidden meanings: cultural content and context in Harrison White’s structural sociology. Sociol. Theory 10, 194–208 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burt R.S.: Network items and the general social survey. Social Netw. 6, 293–339 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burt R.S.: Structural Holes: the Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  19. Burt R.S.: The gender of social capital. Ration. Soc. 10(1), 5 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carley K.: An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure. J. Math. Soc. 12, 137–189 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carrington, P.J., Scott, J., Wasserman, S. (eds): Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  22. Coleman J.: Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94, S95–S120 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crossley N.: Networks and complexity: directions for interactionist research. Symb. Interact. 33, 341–363 (2010a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Crossley, N.: The social world of the network. Sociologica (2010b). doi: 10.2383/32049
  25. de Nooy W.: The dynamics of artistic prestige. Poetics 30(3), 147 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. de Nooy W.: Formalizing symbolic interactionism. Methodol. Innov. Online 4, 39–52 (2009)Google Scholar
  27. DiMaggio P.: Classification in art. Am. Sociol. Rev.w 52(4), 440–455 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. DiMaggio P.: Nadel’s paradox revisited: relational and cultural aspects of organizational structure. In: Nohria, N., Eccles, R. (eds) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, pp. 118–142. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1992)Google Scholar
  29. Elias N.: What is Sociology. Hutchinson, London (1978)Google Scholar
  30. Elias N., Scotson J.: The Established and the Outsiders. Sage, London (2000)Google Scholar
  31. Emirbayer M.: Manifesto for a relational sociology. Am. J. Sociol. 103(2), 281–317 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Emirbayer M., Goodwin J.: Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. Am. J. Sociol. 99(6), 1411–1454 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Erickson B.: The relational basis of attitudes. In: Wellman, B., Berkowitz, S. (eds) Social Structures: A Network Approach., pp. 99–121. Cambridge University Press, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  34. Faulkner R.: Music on Demand. Transaction Books, New Brunswick (1983)Google Scholar
  35. Fine G.A.: Small groups and culture creation: the idioculture of little league baseball teams. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44(5), 733–745 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fine G.A., Kleinman S.: Network and meaning: an interactionist approach to structure. Symb. Interact. 6, 97–110 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fischer C.: What do we mean by ‘Friend’? An inductive study. Social Netw. 3, 287–306 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fischer C.: To dwell among friends; personal networks in town and city. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1983)Google Scholar
  39. Freeman, L.: Visualizing social networks. J. Social Struct. (2000) 1(1)Google Scholar
  40. Freeman L.: The Development of Social Network Analysis. A Study in the Sociology of Science. Empirical Press, Vancouver (2004)Google Scholar
  41. Fuhse J.: The meaning structure of social networks. Sociol. Theory 27(1), 51–73 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gibson D.R.: Participation shifts: order and differentiation in group conversation. Social Forces 81(4), 1135–1180 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gibson D.R.: Taking turns and talking ties: networks and conversational interaction. Am. J. Sociol. 110(6), 1561–1597 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gould R.V.: Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris commune, 1871. Am. Sociol. Rev. 56(6), 716–729 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gould R.V.: Insurgent identities; class, community, and protest in Paris from 1848 to the commune. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1995)Google Scholar
  46. Granovetter M.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6), 1360–1380 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Granovetter M.: Economic action and social structure. The problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91, 481–510 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Granovetter, M.: Introduction for the French reader. Sociologica (2007). doi: 10.2383/24767
  49. Hallinan M., Williams R.: Interracial friendship choices in secondary schools. Am. Sociol. Rev. 54, 67–78 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hannerz U.: Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning. Columbia University Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  51. Hedström P.: Dissecting the Social. On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Holland P.W., Leinhardt S.: Social Structure as a Network Process. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 6, 386–402 (1977)Google Scholar
  53. Hollstein B., Straus F.: Qualitative Netzwerkanalyse. Konzepte, Methoden, Anwendungen. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden (2006)Google Scholar
  54. Ikegami E.: Bonds of Civility. Aesthetic Networks and the Political Origins of Japanese Culture. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  55. Keim S., Klärner A., Bernardi L.: Qualifying social influence on fertility intentions: composition, structure and meaning of fertility-relevant social networks in Western Germany. Curr. Sociol. 57, 888–907 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kennedy M.T.: Behind the one-way mirror: refraction in the construction of product market categories. Poetics 33(3-4), 201–226 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kirke, D.: Comment on Nick Crossley/2. Sociologica (2010). doi: 10.2383/32051
  58. Knox H., Savage M., Harvey P.: Social networks and the study of relations: networks as method, metaphor and form. Econ. Soc. 35(1), 113–140 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Krackhardt D.: Cognitive social structures. Social Netw. 9, 109–134 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Latour B.: The Pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  61. Latour B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  62. Laumann E.O.: Bonds of Pluralism. The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. Wiley, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  63. Law, J., Hassard, J. (eds): Actor Network Theory and After. Blackwell, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  64. Lazarsfeld P.F., Berelson B., Gaudet H.: The People’s Choice. Columbia University Press, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  65. Lazega E., Pattison P.: Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study. Social Netw. 21, 67–90 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lin N.: Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  67. Lizardo O.: How cultural tastes shape personal networks. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71(5), 778–807 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lorraine F., White H.C.: Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. J. Math. Sociol. 1(1), 49–80 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Louch H.: Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations. Social Netw. 22(1), 45–64 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lubbers M., Molina J.L., Lerner J., Brandes U., Ávila J., McCarty C.: Longitudinal analysis of personal networks. The case of Argentinean migrants in Spain. Social Netw. 22, 91–104 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Luhmann N.: Essays on Self-Reference. Columbia University Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  72. Luhmann N.: Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1996)Google Scholar
  73. Mann M.: The Sources of Social Power, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, New York (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Marsden P.: Recent developments in network measurement. In: Carrington, P.J, Scott, J., Wasserman, S. (eds) Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, pp. 8–30. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  75. Martin J.L.: What do animals do all day?: The division of labor, class bodies, and totemic thinking in the popular imagination. Poetics 27(2-3), 195–231 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Martin J.L.: What is field theory?. Am. J. Sociol. 109(1), 1–49 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Martin J.L.: Is power sexy?. Am. J. Sociol. 111, 408–446 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mayer P., Mayer I.: Townsmen or Tribesmen: Conservation and the Process of Urbanization in a South African City. Oxford University Press, Cape Town (1961)Google Scholar
  79. McCall G., Simmons J.L.: Identities and Interactions. Free Press, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  80. McLean P.: A frame analysis of favor seeking in the Renaissance: agency, networks, and political culture. Am. J. Sociol. 104(1), 51–91 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. McLean P.: The Art of the Network. Strategic Interaction and Patronage in Renaissance Florence. Duke University Press, Durham (2007)Google Scholar
  82. Mead G.H.: Mind, Self & Society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1967)Google Scholar
  83. Merton R.: The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Rev. 8, 193–210 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mische A.: Cross-talk in movements: reconceiving the culture-network link. In: Diani, M., McAdam, D. (eds) Social Movements and Networks, pp. 258–280. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Mische A.: Partisan Publics. Communication and Contention Across Brazilian Youth Activist Networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)Google Scholar
  86. Mische A., White H.C.: Between conversation and situation: public switching dynamics across network domains. Social Res. 65(3), 695–724 (1998)Google Scholar
  87. Mitchell J.C.: The concept and use of social networks. In: Mitchell, J.C. (eds) Social Networks in Urban Situations, pp. 1–50. Manchester University Press, Manchester (1969)Google Scholar
  88. Mitchell J.C.: Networks, norms, and institutions. In: Boissevain, J., Mitchell, J.C. (eds) Network Analysis, pp. 2–35. Mouton, Den Haag (1973)Google Scholar
  89. Mitchell J.C.: Social Networks. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 3, 279–299 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Mohr J.W.: Soldiers, mothers, tramps and others: discourse roles in the 1907 New York city charity directory. Poetics 22, 327–357 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Mohr J.W.: Measuring meaning structures. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24, 345–370 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Moore G.: Structural determinants of men’s and women’s networks. Am. Sociol. Rev. 55, 726–735 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Mützel S.: Making meaning of the move of the German capital: networks, logics, and the emergence of capital city journalism. UMI, Ann Arbor (2002)Google Scholar
  94. Mützel S.: Networks as culturally constituted processes: a comparison of relational sociology and actor-network theory. Curr. Sociol. 57(6), 871–887 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Pachucki M.A., Breiger R.L.: Cultural holes: beyond relationality in social networks and culture. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36, 205–224 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Padgett J., Ansell C.K.: Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. Am. J. Sociol. 98(6), 1259–1319 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pappi F.U.: Sozialstruktur und soziale Schichtung in einer Kleinstadt mit heterogener Bevölkerung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 25, 23–74 (1973)Google Scholar
  98. Podolny J.M.: Status signals: a sociological study of market competition. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)Google Scholar
  99. Portes A.: Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24, 1–24 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Robins G., Pattison P., Kalish Y., Lusher D.: An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Netw. 29(2), 173–191 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Robins G., Snijders T., Wang P., Handcock M., Pattison P.: Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Netw. 29(2), 192–215 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Rytina S., Morgan D.: The arithmetic of social relations: the interplay of category and network. Am. J. Sociol. 88, 88–113 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Salvini A.: Symbolic interactionism and social network analysis: an uncertain encounter. Symbol. Interact. 33, 364–388 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sampson, S.F.: A Novitiate in a Period of Change. An Experimental and Case Study of Social Relationships (PhD thesis). Cornell University, Ithaca (1968)Google Scholar
  105. Schütz A.: The Phenomenology of the Social World. Northwestern University Press, Evanston (1967)Google Scholar
  106. Schweizer T.: Muster sozialer Ordnung: Netzwerkanalyse als Fundament der Sozialethnologie. Dietrich Reimer Verlag, Berlin (1996)Google Scholar
  107. Scott J.: Social Network Analysis. 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park (2000)Google Scholar
  108. Shibutani T.: Reference groups as perspectives. Am. J. Sociol. 60, 562–569 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Simmel G.: Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M. (1992)Google Scholar
  110. Somers M.R.: The narrative constitution of identity: a relational and network approach. Theory Soc. 23, 605–649 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Steglich C., Snijders T., West P.: Applying SIENA; an illustrative analysis of the coevolution of adolescents’ friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption. Methodology 2, 48–56 (2006)Google Scholar
  112. Tilly C.: Popular contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  113. Tilly C.: Stories, Identities, and Political Change. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham (2002)Google Scholar
  114. Tilly C.: Identities, Boundaries, and Social Ties. Paradigm Publishers, Boulder (2005)Google Scholar
  115. Uzzi B.: The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61(4), 674–698 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Uzzi B.: Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of emdeddedness. Adm. Sci. Q. 42(1), 35–67 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Verbrugge L.: The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces 56, 576–597 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Warner W.L., Lunt P.S.: The Social Life of a Modern Community. Yale University Press, New Haven (1941)Google Scholar
  119. Wasserman S., Faust K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  120. Wasserman S., Robins G.: An introduction to random graphs, dependence graphs, and p*. In: Carrington, P.J., Scott, J., Wasserman, S. (eds) Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, pp. 148–161. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  121. Watts D.J.: The ‘New’ science of networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30, 243–270 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Weber M.: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Mohr, Tübingen (1972)Google Scholar
  123. Wellman B.: The community question: the intimate networks of East Yorkers. Am. J. Sociol. 84, 1201–1231 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Wellman B.: Structural analysis: from method and metaphor to theory and substance. In: Wellman, B., Berkowitz, S.D. (eds) Social Structures: A Network Approach, pp. 19–61. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  125. Wellman B., Gulia M.: Net surfers don’t ride alone: virtual community as community. In: Wellman, B. (eds) Networks in the Global Village, pp. 331–367. Westview Press, Boulder (1999)Google Scholar
  126. Wellman B., Salaff J., Dimitrova D., Garton L., Gulia M., Haythornthwaite C.: Computer networks as social networks: virtual community, computer supported cooperative work and telework. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 22, 213–238 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. White H.C.: Where do markets come from. Am. J. Sociol. 87(3), 517–547 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. White H.C.: Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1992)Google Scholar
  129. White H.C.: Values come in styles, which mate to change. In: Hechter, M., Nadel, L., Michad, R. (eds) The Origins of Values, pp. 63–91. de Gruyter, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  130. White H.C.: Network switchings and Bayesian forks: reconstructing the social and behavioral sicences. Social Res. 62(4), 1035–1063 (1995)Google Scholar
  131. White H.C.: Markets from Networks: Socioeconomic Models of Production. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2002)Google Scholar
  132. White H.C.: Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)Google Scholar
  133. White H.C., Boorman S., Breiger R.L.: Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. Am. J. Sociol. 81(4), 730–779 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. White H.C., Fuhse J., Thiemann M., Buchholz L.: Networks and meaning: styles and switchings. Soziale Systeme 13, 514–526 (2007)Google Scholar
  135. Yeung K.-T.: What does love mean? Exploring network culture in two network settings. Social Forces 84(1), 391–420 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BielefeldBielefeldGermany
  2. 2.Social Science Research Center BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations