Quality & Quantity

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 1059–1063 | Cite as

Networks and geography in the economics of knowledge flows: a commentary

Article

Abstract

In the paper “Networks and geography in the economics of knowledge flows” Maggioni and Uberti provide a rich and detailed overview of the current state-of-art and future challenges of the analysis of knowledge flows in economics. Maggioni and Uberti illustrate how geographical factors and network factors can explain spatial patterns of knowledge flows. This commentary portrays where the type of studies discussed by the authors fit in the wider literature on geography, networks and knowledge flows. Second, the commentary discusses the suggestions of future research the authors describe and proposes some further avenues for future research that are in line with those suggested by the authors. In particular, it zooms in onto the role of comparative statics in studies of network dynamics, stochastic estimation models of network evolution and content-based network analysis in pushing the frontier of research on networks, geography and knowledge flows.

Keywords

Networks Geography Knowledge flows Network dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almeida P., Kogut B.: Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Manag. Sci. 45, 905–917 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boschma R.A.: Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg. Stud. 39, 61–74 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boschma R.A., Frenken K.: The spatial evolution of innovation networks: a proximity perspective. In: Boschma, R.A., Martin, R. (eds) The Handbook on Evolutionary Economic Geography, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2009)Google Scholar
  4. Cowan R., Jonard N., Zimmermann J.B.: Evolving networks of inventors. J. Evol. Econ. 16, 155–174 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Criscuolo P., Salter A., Sheehan T.: Making knowledge visible: using expert yellow pages to map capabilities in professional services firms. Res. Policy 36, 1603–1619 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahl M.S., Pedersen C.Ø.R.: Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality?. Res. Policy 33, 1673–1686 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grabher G.: The Embedded Firm. On the Sociometrics of Industrial Networks. Routledge, London (1993)Google Scholar
  8. Grabher G., Ibert O.: Bad company? The ambiguity of personal knowledge networks. J. Econ. Geogr. 6, 251–271 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maggioni, M.A., Uberti, T.E.: Networks and geography in the economics of knowledge flows. Qual. Quant. doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9491-4 (2011)
  10. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Newman M.E.J., Strogatz S.H., Watts D.J.: Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Phys. Rev. E. 6402, 026118 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nooteboom B.: Learning by interaction: absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. J. Manag. Gov. 4, 69–92 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Snijders T.A.B., Steglich C.E.G., Schweinberger M., Huisman M.: Manual for Siena Version 3. University of Groningen, Groningen (2007)Google Scholar
  14. Ter Wal, A.L.J.: Cluster emergence and network evolution: a longitudinal analysis of the inventor network in Sophia-Antipolis. Reg. Stud. 45, forthcoming (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Innovation Studies CentreImperial College Business SchoolLondonUK

Personalised recommendations