Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 1617–1624 | Cite as

Comparing levels of anti-Muslim attitudes across Western countries

  • Michael SavelkoulEmail author
  • Peer Scheepers
  • William van der Veld
  • Louk Hagendoorn
Article

Abstract

In this study we describe differences of the ethnic majorities’ attitudes toward Muslims across Western countries. Using data from the Pew Global Attitudes Survey (2005), we were able to increase and test cross-cultural comparability of anti-Muslim attitudes. We constructed a single factor CFA model with three indicators, which was tested for scalar equivalence. Our results indicate that anti-Muslim attitudes differ significantly across the countries in our analysis. Germany and the Netherlands turned out to display relatively high levels of anti-Muslim attitudes, whereas these levels were relatively low in Great-Britain and the USA. We conclude our study with giving some post-hoc explanations for the differences found across countries.

Keywords

Anti-Muslim attitudes Cross-cultural research Measurement equivalence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen C., Nielsen J.S.: Summary report on Islamophobia in the E.U. after 11 September 2001. European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, Vienna (2002)Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W.: The Nature of Prejudice. Beacon Press, Boston (1954/1979)Google Scholar
  3. Babakus E., Ferguson C.E., Jöreskog K.G.: The sensitivity of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis to violations of measurement scale and distributional assumptions. J. Market. Res. 24, 222–228 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blalock H.M.: Toward a Theory of Minority Group Relations. Wiley, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  5. Bollen K.A.: Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  6. Dagevos, J., Euwals, R., Gijsberts, M., Roodenburg, H.: Turken in Nederland en Duitsland: De arbeidsmarktpositie vergeleken [Turks in the Netherlands and Germany: comparing the labour market position]. SCP/CPB, The Hague (2006)Google Scholar
  7. ECRI: Derde rapport over Nederland [Third report on the Netherlands]. European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, Strassbourg (2008)Google Scholar
  8. Fetzer J.S., Soper J.C.: The roots of public attitudes toward state accommodation of European Muslims’ religious practices before and after September 11. J. Sci. Study Relig. 42, 247–258 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. González K.V., Verkuyten M., Weesie J., Poppe E.: Prejudice toward Muslims in the Netherlands: testing integrated threat theory. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 47, 667–685 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jöreskog K.G., Sörbom D.: LISREL for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood (2006)Google Scholar
  11. Mclaren L., Johnson M.: Resources, group conflict and symbols: explaining anti-immigration hostility in Britain. Political Stud. 55, 709–732 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Muthén B., Kaplan D.: A comparison of some of the methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 38, 171–189 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. OECD: Harmonized unemployment rates 2005. http://stats.oecd.org (2010). Accessed 7 June 2010
  14. Olzak S.: The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict. Stanford University Press, Standford (1992)Google Scholar
  15. Pew Global Attitudes Survey: Islamic extremism: common concern for Muslim and Western Publics—methodological appendix. Pew Research Center, Washington (2005)Google Scholar
  16. Pew Research Center: Mapping the global Muslim population: a report on the size and distribution of the world’s Muslim population. Pew Research Center, Washington (2009)Google Scholar
  17. Quillian L.: Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. Am. Sociol. Rev. 60, 586–611 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Satorra A.: Asymptotic robust inferences in the analysis of mean and covariance structures. Sociol. Methodol. 22, 249–278 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scheepers P., Gijsberts M., Coenders M.: Ethnic exclusionism in European countries. Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 18, 17–34 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schneider S.L.: Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 24, 53–67 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sniderman P.M., Hagendoorn L.: When Ways of Life Collide. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)Google Scholar
  22. Sniderman P.M., Hagendoorn L., Prior M.: De moeizame acceptatie van moslims in Nederland [The difficult acceptation of Muslims in the Netherlands]. Mens Maatschappij 78, 199–217 (2003)Google Scholar
  23. Sniderman P.M., Hagendoorn L., Prior M.: Predisposing factors and situational triggers: exclusionary reactions to immigrant minorities. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 98, 35–49 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. Statistics Canada: The Canadian labour Market at a Glance. Statistics Canada, Ottawa (2006)Google Scholar
  25. Strabac Z., Listhaug O.: Anti-Muslim prejudice in Europe: a multilevel analysis of survey data from 30 countries. Soc. Sci. Res. 37, 268–286 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. van de Vijver F., Leung K.: Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1997)Google Scholar
  27. Wike R., Grim B.J.: Western views toward Muslims: evidence from a 2006 cross-national survey. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 22, 4–25 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wuthnow R., Hackett C.: The social integration of practitioners of non-Western religions in the United States. J. Sci. Study Relig. 42, 651–667 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zick A., Pettigrew T.F., Wagner U.: Ethnic prejudice and discrimination in Europe. J. Soc. Issues 64, 233–251 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zolberg A.R., Woon L.L.: Why Islam is like Spanish: cultural incorporation in Europe and the United States. Politics Soc. 27, 5–38 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Savelkoul
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peer Scheepers
    • 1
  • William van der Veld
    • 2
  • Louk Hagendoorn
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Developmental PsychologyRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.European Research Centre on Migration and Ethnic RelationsUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations