Quality & Quantity

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 795–812 | Cite as

Combining research techniques to improve quality service in hospitality

  • Mar Vila
  • Xari Rovira
  • Gerard Costa
  • Ricard Santoma


Hospitality research includes many studies that combine and revisit the quantitative–qualitative debate, and review the arguments for and against using mixed-methods. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the application of qualitative methodologies based on the combination of techniques which also include quantitative elements in addition to those pertaining to qualitative techniques. The research aims to specifically identify the most important managerial factors which, from the point of view of hotel chain executives, serve to improve the quality of the service they provide. The techniques used are concept mapping and qualitative optimization, both of which are qualitative methodologies though they include quantitative elements to overcome the subjectivity deficits typically found in qualitative methodologies. In addition, the combination of both techniques leads to greater precision of the results obtained. Our methodological proposal combines concept mapping with qualitative optimisation, thereby improving the prioritisation and hierarchical ordering of the ideas obtained and structured. Instead of working with each cluster’s average score in terms of importance (as defined within the concept mapping model), our contribution is based on prioritising these based on their distance to the optimal reference. This allows for experts’ evaluations of each idea in terms of its importance to not be strictly quantitative, that is, the experts are not obligated to assign numbers to their evaluations; rather, they can assess ideas based on qualitative labels.


Mixed-methodology Concept-mapping Qualitative optimization Hospitality Quantitative–qualitative methodologies Quality service 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agell N., Piera N.: Relacions qualitatives per al càlcul amb ordres de magnituds. Working Papers ESADE 89, 2–10 (1992)Google Scholar
  2. Agell, N., Rovira, X., Ansótegui, C., Sánchez, M., Prats, F.: Homogenising references in ordres of magnitude spaces: an application to credit risk prediction. In: Proceedings XIV International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning. University Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, México (2000)Google Scholar
  3. Barth M.C.: A low-cost, post hoc method to rate overall site quality in a multi-site demonstration. Am. J. Eval. 25(1), 79–97 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beeril A.: La metodología científica del Marketing y sus diferentes orientaciones. Investig. Mark. 43, 61–68 (1994)Google Scholar
  5. Bigné E.: Una concepción ecléctica de la orientación al mercado y su escala de medición. Rev. Española Investigación Marketing 6, 33–57 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. Bigné J.E., Aldás-Manzano J., Küster I., Vila N.: The concept mapping approach in marketing: an application in the travel agencies sector. Qual. Mark. Res. 5(2), 87–95 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonoma T.V.: Case research in marketing: opportunities, problems, and a process. J. Mark. Res. XXII, 199–208 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calvo de Mora A., Criado F., Periáñez R.: Desarrollo de un instrumento para evaluar la idoneidad de los planes docentes: una aplicación a la diplomatura en turismo. Presented in Decisiones basadas en el conocimiento y en el papel social de la empresa. Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, Palma de Mallorca (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Camisón C., Cruz S., González T.: Gestión de la calidad: conceptos, enfoques y sistemas. Pearson-Prentice Hall, Madrid (2007)Google Scholar
  10. Easterby-Smith M., Lowe A.: Management Research: An Introduction. Sage, London (1991)Google Scholar
  11. Eisenhardt K.M.: Building Theories from Case Study Research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14, 532–550 (1989)Google Scholar
  12. Flick U.: An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage, London (1998)Google Scholar
  13. Goulding C.: Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers. Sage, London (2002)Google Scholar
  14. Hair J.F., Black B., Babin B., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L.: Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2006)Google Scholar
  15. Harris L.C., Piercy N.F.: Management behavior and barriers to market orientation in retailing companies. J. Serv. Mark. 13, 113–131 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heskett, J.L., Jones, T.O., Loveman, G.W., Sasser, W.E. Jr., Schlesinger, L.A.: Putting the service profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review, March–April, 105–11 (1994)Google Scholar
  17. Jackson K.M., Trochim W.M.K.: Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organ. Res. Meth. 5(4), 302–336 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kruskal J.B.:, Wish M.: Multidimensional Scaling. Sage, London (1978)Google Scholar
  19. Marshall C., , Marshall C., : Designing Qualitative Research. Sage, London (1989)Google Scholar
  20. McKercher B., Law R., Lam T.: Rating tourism and hospitality journals. Tour. Manag. 27, 1235–1252 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miles M.B., Huberman A.M.: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage, London (1994)Google Scholar
  22. Morse J.M.: Designing funded qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, London (1994)Google Scholar
  23. Nabitz U., Severens P., Brink W., Jansen P.: Improving the EFQM model: an empirical study on model development and theory building using concept mapping. Total Qual. Manag. 12(1), 69–81 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oh H.: Service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer value: a holistic perspective. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 18, 67–82 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Olorunniwo F., Hsu M.K., Udo G.J.: Service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in the service factory. J. Serv. Mark. 20(1), 59–72 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Patton M.Q.: Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage, London (2002)Google Scholar
  27. Puig-Durán, J. Certificación y modelos de calidad en hostelería y restauración. Díaz de Santos, Madrid (2006)Google Scholar
  28. Rosas S.R., Camphausen L.C.: The use of concept mapping for scale development and validation in evaluation. Eval. Program Plan. 30, 125–135 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sale J., Lohfeld L., Brazil K.: Revisiting the quantitative–qualitative debate: implicactions for mixed-methods research. Qual. Quant. 36, 43–52 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sánchez, M., Hu, Y.C., Prats, F., Rovira, X, Sayeras, J.M., Dawson, J.: Ranking features by means of a qualitative optimization process. In: Proceedings X Congrès internacional de l’Associació Catalana d’Intel.ligència artificial, Andorra (2007)Google Scholar
  31. Santomà, R.: Aspectos de gestión en la calidad de servicio. Una aplicación del concept mapping al caso de las cadenas hoteleras en España. Doctoral Thesis. IQS Facultad de Economía, Ramon Llull University (2008)Google Scholar
  32. Santomà R., Costa G.: Calidad de servicio en la industria hotelera: revisión de la literatura. Rev. Análisis Turístico 3, 27–44 (2008)Google Scholar
  33. Simpson B.: How Do Women Scientists Perceive Their Own Career Development?. Int. J. Career Manag. 6(1), 19–27 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Strauss A., Corbin J.: Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage, London (1998)Google Scholar
  35. Travé L., Dague P.: Modèles et rasionnements qualitatifs. Lavoisier, Hermes Science, París (2003)Google Scholar
  36. Trochim W.M.K.: An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval. Program Plan. 12, 1–16 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trochim W.M.K., Milstein B., Wood B.J., Jackson S., Pressler V.: Setting objectives for community and systems change: an application of concept mapping for planning a statewide health improvement initiative. Health Promot. Pract. 5, 8–19 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vila, M.: Aportación al cuadro de mando integral para cadenas hoteleras. Estudio de ejes y variables críticas de actuación en el ámbito español. Doctoral Thesis, Departamento de marketing, operaciones y finanzas. ESADE – Ramon Llull University (2004)Google Scholar
  39. Ward J.H.: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 236–244 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yampolskaya S., Nessman T., Hernández M., Koch D.: Using concept mapping to develop a logic model and articulate a program theory: a case example. Am. J. Eval. 25(2), 191–207 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mar Vila
    • 1
  • Xari Rovira
    • 1
  • Gerard Costa
    • 1
  • Ricard Santoma
    • 2
  1. 1.ESADE, Universitat Ramon LlullBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Turisme Sant Ignasi, Universitat Ramon LlullBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations