Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 267–279 | Cite as

Humorous coping scales and their fit to a stress and coping framework

  • Sibe Doosje
  • J. A. Landsheer
  • Martijn P. M. de Goede
  • Lorenz J. P. van Doornen
Research Note

Abstract

The focus of this study is on the fit between the item content of scales measuring humorous coping and basic concepts of stress and coping theory. To investigate this fit 81 items from seven currently available humorous coping scales have been subjected to a facet analysis, using the tool of a mapping sentence. Three facets derived from stress and coping theory were part of this mapping sentence: external demands, humorous responses and coping aims. Because of the claim that humorous coping may be related to physical health dimensions, special attention has been paid to two health-related coping aims: cognitive reappraisal and response-focused coping responses. Five raters categorized the facets and their respective categories. Some humorous coping scales showed an underrepresentation of “external demands” and “humorous responses” and only a few scales covered the “aims” facet adequately. Reliability and agreement parameters varied considerably among scales, both on facet level and on category level. The Waterloo University Humor Inventory (WUHI) was a positive exception to this pattern. Findings are discussed in the light of specific characteristics of the scales included. Possible improvements of humorous coping measurement in health-related research are proposed, as well as adaptations to the rating procedures.

Keywords

Stress and coping theory Humorous coping Facet analysis Mapping sentence Health-related assessment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austenfeld J.L., Stanton A.L.: Coping through emotional approach: a new look at emotion, coping, and health-related outcomes. J. Pers. 72, 1335–1363 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borg I., Shye S.: Facet Theory: Form and Content. Sage, London (1995)Google Scholar
  3. Carver C.S.: You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. Int. J. Behav. Med. 4, 92–100 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dalgaard P.: Introductory Statistics with R. Springer, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  5. De Koning E., Weiss R.L.: The relational humor inventory: functions of humor in close relationships. Am. J. Fam. Ther. 30, 1–18 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doosje S., De Goede M.P.M., Van Doornen L.J.P., Goldstein J.H.: Measurement of occupational humorous coping. Humor: Int. J. Humor Res. 23, 275–306 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eggli, P.: Humor und gesundheit: Eine langschnittuntersuchung an studienanfängerinnen über ‘sinn für humor’ als personale ressource. Unpublished Abhandlung zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde, Zürich, Switzerland, Universität Zürich (1997)Google Scholar
  8. Feinstein A.R., Cichetti D.V.: High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 43(6), 543–549 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fillion L., Kovacs A.H., Gagnon P., Endler N.S.: Validation of the shortened COPE for use with breast cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. Curr. Psychol. 21, 17–34 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fleiss J.L.: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull. 76, 378–382 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gross J.J.: Emotion regulation in adulthood: timing is everything. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 10, 214–219 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guttman L.: An outline of some new methodology for social research. Public Opin. Quart. 18, 395–404 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hox J.J.: From theoretical concept to survey question. In: Lyberg, L., Biemer, P., Collins, M., de Leeuw, E., Dippo, C., Schwartz, N., Trewin, D. (eds) Survey Management and Process Quality, pp. 47–69. Wiley, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  14. John O.P., Gross J.J.: Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. J. Pers. 72, 1301–1333 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Landis J.R., Koch G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159–174 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Landsheer, J.A., Boeije, H.R.: In search of content validity: facet analysis as a qualitative method to improve questionnaire design. An application in health research. Qual. Quant. doi: 10.1007/s11135-008-9179-6 (2009)
  17. Lazarus R.S., Folkman S.: Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  18. MacKay D.J.C.: Introduction to Monte Carlo methods. In: Jordan, M.I. (eds) Learning in Graphical Models, pp. 175–204. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht (1998)Google Scholar
  19. Martin R.A.: Humor, laughter, and physical health: methodological issues and research findings. Psychol. Bull. 127(4), 504–519 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin R.A., Lefcourt H.M.: Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45, 1313–1324 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin R.A., Puhlik-Doris P., Larsen G., Gray J., Weir K.: Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: development of the humor styles questionnaire. J. Res. Pers. 37, 48–75 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nezlek J.B., Derks P.: Use of humor as a coping mechanism, psychological adjustment, and social interaction. Humor: Int. J. Humor Res. 14, 395–413 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Overholser J.C.: Sense of humor when coping with life stress. Pers. Ind. Diff. 13, 799–804 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shye, S., Elizur, D., Hoffman, M.: Introduction to Facet Theory: Content Design and Intrinsic Data Analysis in Behavioral Research. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 35. Sage, London (1994)Google Scholar
  25. Thomas, S.E.: An investigation into the use of humor for coping with stress. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Waterloo University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (2000)Google Scholar
  26. Thorson J.A., Powell F.C.: Measurement of sense of humor. Psychol. Rep. 69, 691–702 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thorson J.A., Powell F.C.: Development and validation of a multidimensional sense of humor scale. J. Clin. Psychol. 49, 13–23 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tinn-R: Tinn-R. http://www.sciviews.org/Tinn-R/ (2006). Retrieved 24 Apr 2008

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sibe Doosje
    • 1
  • J. A. Landsheer
    • 2
  • Martijn P. M. de Goede
    • 2
  • Lorenz J. P. van Doornen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical and Health PsychologyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Methodology and StatisticsUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations