Applying information-based methods in importance–performance analysis when the information of importance is unavailable
Importance–performance analysis (IPA) is very useful for practitioners to improve service quality and increase customer satisfaction by identifying the major strengths and weaknesses. A survey is typically conducted to gather the needed information about importance and performance. If the survey does not include the information about the importance, this study introduces two information-based methods, namely entropy and mutual information methods. These two methods can be applied in either ordinal or metric data without the assumption of data to be Gaussian or symmetric distributed. Moreover, mutual information method uses the objective function to reduce the uncertainties when the outcome of the dependent variable is predicted where the dependent variable is the overall satisfaction. In this study, integrated frameworks of these two methods are proposed, and each framework consists of four steps to describe how the information of importance can be derived when the matrix of importance–performance analysis is to be constructed. Finally, a case study of Hi-Life convenient store in the university is illustrated to examine the service quality by these two proposed frameworks when the importance is unavailable directly from the survey.
KeywordsImportance–performance analysis Entropy Mutual information Dependence Convenient store
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Allen I.E., Seaman C.A.: Likert scales and data analyses. Qual. Prog. 40(7), 64–65 (2007)Google Scholar
- Black T.R.: Doing Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences: An Integrated Approach to Research Design, Measurement and Statistics. Sage, London (1999)Google Scholar
- Cover T., Thomas J.: Elements of Information Theory, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York (2006)Google Scholar
- Ferdousi, Z., Maeda, A.: Anomaly detection using unsupervised profiling method in time series data. In: Proceedings of the 10th East-European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS2006), Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 107–119 (2006)Google Scholar
- Magal, S.R., Levenburg, N.M.: Using importance–performance analysis to evaluate e-business strategies among small businesses. In: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’05), Hawaii, USA, p. 176a (2005)Google Scholar
- May, R.J., Dandy, G.C., Maier, H.R., Fernando, T.M.K.: Critical values of a kernel density-based mutual information estimator. In: 2006 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 4898–4903 (2006)Google Scholar
- Shannon C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423 (1948)Google Scholar
- Shaw N.C., DeLone W.H., Niederman F.: Sources of dissatisfaction in end-user support: an empirical study. Data Base Adv. Inf. Syst. 33(2), 41–56 (2002)Google Scholar
- Vigderhous G.: The level of measurement and permissible statistical analysis in social research. Pac. Sociol. Rev. 20(1), 61–72 (1977)Google Scholar