Does spatial visualization ability improve after studying technical drawing?
- 194 Downloads
Two studies were carried out to analyze whether learning technical drawing improves a person’s ability for spatial visualization. Visualization and inductive reasoning tests were applied at the beginning and end of a course in technical drawing in samples of first year engineering students. In both studies it was observed that a moderate percentage of students improved their Visualization test execution. The improvement was similar in men and women. There was no improvement on the inductive reasoning test. The results support the conclusion that the spatial visualization ability can be improved with training.
KeywordsSpatial ability Spatial visualization Inductive reasoning Technical drawing Training Rasch model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ackerman P.L., Kanfer R., Goff M.: Cognitive and noncognitive determinants of complex skill acquisition. J. Exp. Psychol. 1, 270–304 (1995)Google Scholar
- Bennet G., Seashore H., Wesman A.: Differential Aptitude Test. Psychological Corp, New York (1947)Google Scholar
- Brody N.: Intelligence. Academic, San Diego, CA (1992)Google Scholar
- Halpern D.F.: Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2000)Google Scholar
- Linacre J.M.: A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS & MINISTEPS: Rasch Model Computers Programs. Winsteps.com., Chicago, IL (2006)Google Scholar
- Lohman D.F.: Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In: Sternberg, R.J. (eds) Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, pp. 181–248. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1988)Google Scholar
- Newcombe N.S., Mathason L., Terlecki M.: Maximization of spatial competence: more important than finding the cause of sex differences. In: McGillicudy-De Lisi, A., De Lisi, R. (eds) Biology, Society, and Behavior: The Development of Sex Differences in Cognition, pp. 183–206. Ablex, Wesport, CT (2002)Google Scholar
- Prieto G., Velasco A.D.: Construção de um teste de visualização a partir da psicologia cognitiva. Avaliaç 1, 39–47 (2002)Google Scholar
- Schumacker R.E.: Rasch measurement: the dichotomous model. In: Smith, E.V., Smith, R.M. Introduction to Rasch Measurement, pp. 226–253. JAM, Maple Grove, Mn (2004)Google Scholar
- Wilson M.: Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahvah, NJ (2005)Google Scholar
- Peterson A., Wittig M.: Sex-Related Differences in Cognitive Functioning: Developmental Issues. Academic, New York (1979)Google Scholar
- Wolfe E.W., Chiu C.W.T.: Measuring pretest–posttest change with a Rasch rating scale model. J. Outcome Meas. 3, 134–161 (1999)Google Scholar
- Wright B.D.: Comparisons require stability. Rasch Meas. Trans. 10, 506 (1996)Google Scholar
- Wright B.D.: Time 1 to Time 2 comparison. Rasch Meas. Trans. 10, 478–479 (1996)Google Scholar
- Wright B.D., Masters G.N.: Rating Scale Analysis. MESA, Chicago (1982)Google Scholar