Quality & Quantity

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 893–904 | Cite as

The impact of modern education in the Ouramant region of Iranian Kurdistan: a grounded study

Article
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

Ouraman Takht is a rural, highly mountainous and dry region located in the southwest Kurdistan province of Iran. Traditionally, the socio-economic structure of the region was based on limited farming, herding, gardening, and manual labor. Recently, modern education has been introduced to the region. The purpose of this study was to explore, from the Ouraman perspective, the impact that modern educational practices have had on the Ouraman traditional way of life. Data were collected over a period of 6 months using ethnographic methods including observation, interview, videotaping, and photography. Data were analyzed using Grounded Theory Methodology. Enabling/Constraining was the concept constructed from data to explain the impact that modern education has on the Ouramat region. The people of Ouraman perceived modern education as increasing the economic stability and growth of the region while simultaneously threatening cultural beliefs and the traditional way of life. In addition to the “core” category of “Enabling/Constraining, 13 other major categories were derived from data. These included: job necessity, Providing Economic Prosperity, empowerment, increasing public knowledge, positive notion, concerns about religious beliefs, emphasis on children’s education, religious justifications, modernism requirements, traditional concerns, education for girls, expression of satisfaction, and public embracement. The results are presented in a paradigm model consisting of conditions, interactions and consequences around the core category and can be used to understand the impact of change from the introduction of modern education can have on a traditional society.

Keywords

Ouramanat region Kurdistan Modern education Change Grounded theory Paradigm model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berg B.: Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Allyn and Becon, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  2. Borzoei M.: Political Problems of Kurdistan. Fekre Noe, Tehran, Iran (in Persian) (1999)Google Scholar
  3. Edmond, S.: Kurds, Turks and Arabs. Translated into Persian by E. Yonesi. Rozbehan, Tehran, Iran (1989)Google Scholar
  4. Glaser B., Strauss A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine, Chicago (1967)Google Scholar
  5. Kendal, N., et al.: Kurds. Translated into Persian by E. Yonesi. Rozbehan, Tehran, Iran (1991)Google Scholar
  6. Kochera, C.: National Movement of Kurds. Translated into Persian by E. Yonesi. Negah, Tehran, Iran (1994)Google Scholar
  7. Kurdistani M.: History of Kurd and Kurdistan and its Districts. Garighy, Sannandaj, Iran (in Persian) (1972)Google Scholar
  8. Linan, D.: Kurd and Kurdistan. Translated into Persian by E. Younesi. Negah, Tehran, Iran (1993)Google Scholar
  9. McDowell, D.: The Kurds: An Historical Perspective. In: Asian Affairs 22, 3 (10/91):293–303 (1991)Google Scholar
  10. McDowell, D.: The Modern History of Kurds. Translated into Persian by E. Yonesi. Paniz, Tehran, Iran (2002)Google Scholar
  11. Mohammadpur, A.: The Process and Consequences of Modernization in Iranain Kurdistan From 1921–2000: Case Study of Sardash, Township. MA Thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran (2001)Google Scholar
  12. Mohammadpur, A.: Culture, Education and Development in Contemporary Iranian Kurdistan. Presented in Fourth Annual of Education and Culture Forum, Italy (2005)Google Scholar
  13. Mohammadpur, A.: The Meaning Reconstruction of Modernization Consequences in Ouramanat Region of Iranian Kurdistan, A Grounded Theory Study, Ph.D. Dissertation, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran (2007)Google Scholar
  14. Neuman L.: Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 3rd edn. Allyn and Bacon, London (2000)Google Scholar
  15. Nikitin, V.: Kurds and Kurdistan. Translated into Persian by M. Qazi. Derayat, Tehran, Iran (1999)Google Scholar
  16. Olson, R.: Problem of Kurd. Translated into Persian by E. Younesi (1380). Paniz, Tehran, Iran (2001)Google Scholar
  17. Randall, J.: With This Knowledge What is Forgiveness? Translated into Persian by E. Yonesi. Paniz, Tehran, Iran (2002)Google Scholar
  18. Rezaei, M.: A Study of Population and Human Development Situation in Iranian Kurdistan. M.A. Thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran (2002)Google Scholar
  19. Safinezadeh S.: History of Kurd and Kurdistan. Atie, Teharn (1994)Google Scholar
  20. Strauss A., Juliet C.: Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage, London (1998)Google Scholar
  21. Van Bruinessen, M.: Agaha, Sheikh, State. Translated into Persian by E. Yonesi. Paniz, Tehran, Iran (1999)Google Scholar
  22. Yasemi R.: Kurds and Their Racial and Historical Belonging. Amir Kabir, Tehran, Iran (in Persian) (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyCenter for Population Studies, Shiraz UniversityShirazIslamic Republic of Iran

Personalised recommendations