Quality & Quantity

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 881–892

Generalization practices in qualitative research: a mixed methods case study


DOI: 10.1007/s11135-009-9241-z

Cite this article as:
Onwuegbuzie, A.J. & Leech, N.L. Qual Quant (2010) 44: 881. doi:10.1007/s11135-009-9241-z


The purpose of this mixed methods case study was to examine the generalization practices in qualitative research published in a reputable qualitative journal. In order to accomplish this, all qualitative research articles published in Qualitative Report since its inception in 1990 (n =  273) were examined. A quantitative analysis of the all 125 empirical qualitative research articles revealed that a significant proportion (i.e., 29.6%) of studies involved generalizations beyond the underlying sample that were made inappropriately by the author(s). A qualitative analysis identified the types of over-generalizations that occurred, which included making general recommendations for future practice and providing general policy implications based only on a few cases. Thus, a significant proportion of articles published in Qualitative Report lack what we call interpretive consistency.


Qualitative research Generalization Statistical generalization Analytic generalization Sampling Sample size Interpretive consistency Mixed methods Sequential mixed methods analysis Case study 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Leadership and CounselingSam Houston State UniversityHuntsvilleUSA
  2. 2.University of Colorado DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations