Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 339–368 | Cite as

Probing the Group Faultline Concept: An Evaluation of Measures of Patterned Multi-dimensional Group Diversity

  • Bruno Trezzini
Article

Abstract

The article provides a conceptual and analytical discussion of the group faultline notion introduced to organizational research by Lau and Murnighan (1998). Group faultlines can be thought of as patterned multi-dimensional diversity, and recent attempts to measure faultline strength differ in the way they specify and operationalize this patternedness. I evaluate the comparative validity of these competing measures by scrutinizing their analytical strengths and weaknesses and by applying them to a number of illustrative group constellations that represent different faultline strengths. I conclude that at the current early stage of group faultline research, and given the shortcomings of the available indices, scholars are well advised to use multiple measures of faultline strength in empirical studies so as to better gauge the validity and reliability of both their results and the indices applied. I also caution against excessive hopes with regard to the explanatory power of the faultline concept in empirical research.

Keywords

group faultlines measurement evaluation multi-dimensional diversity polarization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bedeian A.G., Mossholder K.W. (2000). On the use of the coefficient of variation as a measure of diversity. Organizational Research Methods 3(3): 285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blau P.M., Schwartz J.E. (1984). Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations. Orlando, FL, Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Esteban J.-M., Ray D. (1994). On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62(4): 819–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harrison D.A., Price K.H., Bell M.P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal 41(1): 96–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harrison D.A., Price K.H., Gavin J.H., Florey A.T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal 45(5): 1029–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jobson J.D. (1992). Applied Multivariate Data Analysis, Volume II: Categorical and Methods. New York, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  7. Lau D.C., Murnighan J.K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Journal 23(2): 325–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lau D.C., Murnighan J.K. (2005). Interactions within groups and subgroups: the effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal 48(4): 645–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lawrence B.S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science 8(1): 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lieberson S. (1969). Measuring population diversity. American Sociological Review 34(6): 850–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Milliken F.J., Martins L.L. (1996). Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review 21(2): 402–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mueller J.H., Schuessler K.F., Costner H.L. (1970). Statistical Reasoning in Sociology. Boston, Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
  13. Myers D.G. (2002). Social Psychology. New York, McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  14. Pelled L.H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory. Organization Science 7(6): 615–631Google Scholar
  15. Shaw J.B. (2004). The development and analysis of a measure of group faultlines. Organizational Research Methods 7(1): 66–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sørensen J.B. (2002). The use and misuse of the coefficient of variation in organizational demography research. Sociological Methods and Research 30(4): 475–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Taylor M., Rae D. (1969). An analysis of crosscutting between political cleavages. Comparative Politics 1(4): 534–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thatcher S.M.B., Jehn K.A., Zanutto E. (2003). Cracks in diversity research: the effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation 12(3): 217–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Practical SignificanceSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations