Quality and Quantity

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 547–557 | Cite as

Classification and the relations of meaning

  • Andreas Schneider
  • Alden E. Roberts
Article

Abstract

This paper intends to demonstrate the parallels between a qualitative methodology, component analysis, which is predominantly used in cognitive anthropology and linguistics, and the quantitative explorative method-cluster analysis. Social identities and their related structural categories serve as examples of the method. In the methodology and logic involved in the categorization of meaning, abstraction is the key difference between connotative and structural meaning. Abstraction and the identification of higher order categories in cluster analysis are compatible with the extraction of structural meaning from the semantic differential ratings of the affective meanings of identities. The dichotomy of exclusion and inclusion is the most relevant relation for the qualitative analysis of meaning and can be mathematically operationalized by Euclidean squared distance in k-means cluster analysis.

Keywords

Qualitative Analysis Cluster Analysis Social Identity Structural Category Differential Rating 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, K. D. (1975). Cluster analysis. In: David R. Heise (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1975. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 59–128.Google Scholar
  2. Burke, P. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly 43: 18–30.Google Scholar
  3. Burt, R. S. (1988). Some properties of structural equivalence measures derived from sociometric data. Social Networks 10: 1–28.Google Scholar
  4. Callero, P. L. (1994). From role-playing to role-using: A modified measure of social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly 57: 228–243.Google Scholar
  5. Cooley, C. H. (1922). Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  6. Cronbach, L. J. & Gleser, G. C. (1952). Similarity between Persons and Related Problems of Profile Analysis. Urbana: University of Illinois, Bureau of Research and Service, College of Education.Google Scholar
  7. Darendorf, R. (1965). Homo Sociologicus. 15th edn. Köln: Opladen.Google Scholar
  8. Everitt, B. S. (1993). Cluster Analysis. 3rd edn. New York: Halsted Press.Google Scholar
  9. Goodenough, W. H. (1956). Componential analysis and the study of meaning. Language 32: 195–216.Google Scholar
  10. Goodenough, W. H. (1981). Culture, Language and Society. 2nd edn. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar
  11. Hartigan, J. A. (1975). Clustering Algorithms. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Heise, D. R. (2001). Project magellan: Collecting cross-cultural affective meanings via the internet. Electronic Journal of Sociology 5(3).Google Scholar
  13. Heise, D. (1987). Affect control theory: Concepts and model. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 13: 1–33.Google Scholar
  14. Heise, D. (2000). Affect control theory and impression formation. E. Borgatta & M. Borgatta (eds.), Encyclopedia of Sociology, 2nd edn. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Howard, J. A. (1994). A Social Cognitive Conception of Social Structure. Social Psychology Quarterly 57: 210–227.Google Scholar
  16. Kemper, T. D. & Collins, R. (1990). Dimensions of microinteraction. American Journal of Sociology 96: 32–68.Google Scholar
  17. Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998). Numerical Ecology. 2nd English edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  18. McLachan, G. J. (1992). The Use of Cluster Analysis and Related Techniques in Medicine. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1: 27–48.Google Scholar
  19. Mead, H. (1934). In: Charles W. Morris (ed.), Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Nicholas, J. & Sibson, R. (1971). Mathematical Taxonomy. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Nida, E. A. (1975). Componential Analysis of Meaning. Paris: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
  22. Norušis, M. J. (1993). SPSS Base System User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Osgood, C. E. (1960). The cross-cultural generality of visual-verbal synesthetic tendencies. Behavioral Science 5: 146–169. Reprinted in: Charles E. Osgood and O.C.S. Tzeng (eds.), The Selected Papers of C.E. Osgood. New York: Centennial Psychology Series 1992, pp. 203–234.Google Scholar
  24. Osgood, C. E. (1962). Studies of the generality of affective meaning systems. American Psychologist 17: 10–28.Google Scholar
  25. Osgood, C. E., May, W. H. & Miron M. S. (1975). Cross-Cultural Universals in Affective Meaning:. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ridgeway, C. L. & Walker, H. A. (1994). Status Structures. In Karen S. Cook, Gary A. Fine & James S. House (eds.), Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  27. Schneider, A. (1996). Sexual-erotic emotions in the U.S. in cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 16: 123–143.Google Scholar
  28. Schneider, A. (1999a). US neo-conservatism: Cohort and cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 19: 56–86.Google Scholar
  29. Schneider, A. (1999b). The violent character of sexual- eroticism in cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy l8: 81–100.Google Scholar
  30. Schneider, A. (1999c). Emergent clusters of denotative meaning. Electronic Journal of Sociology 4: 2.Google Scholar
  31. Schneider, A. (2002). Computer simulation of behavior prescriptions in multi-cultural corporations. Organization Studies 23: 105–131.Google Scholar
  32. Strauss, A. (1964). George Herbert Mead: On Social Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Strauss, A. (1994). Identity, biography, history, and symbolic representations. Social Psychology Quarterly 58: 4–12.Google Scholar
  34. Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Gummings.Google Scholar
  35. Stryker, S. & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 63: 284–297.Google Scholar
  36. Stuetzle, W. (1995). Data Visualization and Interactive Cluster Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR.Google Scholar
  37. Turner, R. (1962). Role-taking: Process versus conformity? In Arnold M. Rose (ed.), Human Behavior and Social Process, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 20–40.Google Scholar
  38. Turner, R. (1973). The role and the person. American Journal of Sociology 84: 1–23.Google Scholar
  39. Wallace, D. L. (1998) Clustering. In: W. H. Kruskal and J. M. Tanur (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Statistics, Vol. 1, New York: The Free Press, pp. 47–53.Google Scholar
  40. Wilkinson, L. (1990) SYSTAT: The System for Statistics, Inc. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Schneider
    • 1
  • Alden E. Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Antropology and Social WorkTexas Tech UniversityLubbockU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations