Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 447–465 | Cite as

Sardonic Atheists and Silly Evangelicals: the Relationship between Self-Concept and Humor Style

Article

Abstract

Humor is widely used as a means of supporting group solidarity, but what determines the direction that this humor takes (i.e. its quality and targets)? I suggest that the answer lies in an interaction between self-concept, perceptions of outgroups and micro group culture. Aspects of self-concept that are central for a group’s identity work, especially how the group imagines outsiders, open possibilities for certain types of humor while closing off others. Then micro-cultural processes, heavily dependent on the exact persons present in a given interaction, influence the humorous forms used. This process explains why groups in roughly similar structural positions often make use of humor to generate solidarity in strikingly different ways, as well as why styles of humor vary, within limits, within groups. I provide illustrations of this process in two religious minority groups with very different humorous styles: atheists in the Bible Belt and evangelical Christians in Chicago.

Keywords

Humor Self-concept Interaction Atheism Religion Evangelicalism 

References

  1. Abrams, Jessica R., and Amy Bippus. 2011. An intergroup investigation of disparaging humor. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 30 (2): 193–201.Google Scholar
  2. Attardo, Salvatore. 2008. A primer for the linguistics of humor. In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. Victor Raskin, 101–155. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, Joseph O., and Buster G. Smith. 2015. American secularism: Cultural contours of nonreligious belief systems. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Balmer, Randall Herbert. 1989. Mine eyes have seen the glory: A journey into the evangelical subculture in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bebbington, David W. 1989. Evangelicalism in modern Britain: A history from the 1730s to the 1980s. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bender, Courtney. 2003. Heaven’s kitchen: Living religion at God’s Love We Deliver. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cann, Arnie, M. Ashley Norman, Jennifer L. Welbourne, and Lawrence G. Calhoun. 2008. Attachment styles, conflict styles and humour styles: Interrelationships and associations with relationship satisfaction. European Journal of Personality 22 (2): 131–146.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, Guo-Hai, and Rod A. Martin. 2007. A comparison of humor styles, coping humor, and mental health between Chinese and Canadian university students. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 20 (3): 215–234.Google Scholar
  9. Cimino, Richard, and Christopher Smith. 2007. Secular humanism and atheism beyond progressive secularism. Sociology of Religion 68 (4): 407–424.Google Scholar
  10. Cundall, Michael. 2012. Towards a better understanding of racist and ethnic humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 25 (2): 155–177.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, Christie. 1990. Ethnic humor around the world: A comparative analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, Christie. 2010. The mirth of nations. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, Murray S. 1993. What’s so funny?: The comic conception of culture and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Effler, Erika Summers. 2010. Laughing saints and righteous heroes: Emotional rhythms in social movement groups. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eliasoph, Nina, and Paul Lichterman. 2003. Culture in interaction. American Journal of Sociology 108 (4): 735–794.Google Scholar
  16. Ferguson, Mark, and Thomas E. Ford. 2008. Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 21 (3): 283–312.Google Scholar
  17. Fine, Gary Alan. 1983. Sociological aspects of humor. In Handbook of Humor Research, ed. Paul E. McGhee and Jeffrey H. Goldstein, 159–182. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Fine, Gary Alan. 1984. Humorous interaction and the social construction of meaning: Making sense in a jocular vein. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 5: 83–101.Google Scholar
  19. Fine, Gary Alan. 2012. Group culture and the interaction order: Local sociology on the meso-level. Annual Review of Sociology 38 (1): 159–179.Google Scholar
  20. Fine, Gary Alan, and Michaela DeSoucey. 2005. Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 18 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  21. Fine, Gary Alan, and Lori Holyfield. 1996. Secrecy, trust, and dangerous leisure: Generating group cohesion in voluntary organizations. Social Psychology Quarterly 59 (1): 22–38.Google Scholar
  22. Fominaya, Cristina Flesher. 2007. The role of humour in the process of collective identity formation in autonomous social movement groups in contemporary Madrid. International Review of Social History 52 (Supplement S15): 243–258.Google Scholar
  23. Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  24. Gouldner, Alvin Ward. 1979. The future of intellectuals and the rise of the new class. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
  25. Grammich, Clifford, Kirk Hadaway, Richard Houseal, Dale E. Jones, Alexei Krindatch, Richie Stanley, and Richard H. Taylor. 2012. 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study. Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies. Downloaded from the Association of Religion Data Archives www.TheARDA.com. Accessed 16 August 2016.
  26. Guenther, Katja M. 2014. Bounded by disbelief: How atheists in the United States differentiate themselves from religious believers. Journal of Contemporary Religion 29 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
  27. Guenther, Katja M., Kerry Mulligan, and Cameron Papp. 2013. From the outside in: Crossing boundaries to build collective identity in the New Atheist movement. Social Problems 60 (4): 457–475.Google Scholar
  28. Guenther, Katja M., Natasha Radojcic, and Kerry Mulligan. 2015. Humor, collective identity, and framing in the New Atheist movement. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 38:203–27. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  29. Habib, Rania. 2008. Humor and disagreement: Identity construction and cross-cultural enrichment. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (6): 1117–1145.Google Scholar
  30. Heiner, Robert. 1992. Evangelical heathens: The deviant status of freethinkers in Southland. Deviant Behavior 13 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
  31. Heintz, Sonja, and Willibald Ruch. 2015. An examination of the convergence between the conceptualization and the measurement of humor styles: A study of the construct validity of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 28 (4): 611–633.Google Scholar
  32. Holmes, Janet. 2000. Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies 2 (2): 159–185.Google Scholar
  33. Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra. 2002. Having a laugh at work: How humour contributes to workplace culture. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (12): 1683–1710.Google Scholar
  34. Huller, Harry H. 1983. Humor and hostility: A neglected aspect of social movement analysis. Qualitative Sociology 6 (3): 255.Google Scholar
  35. Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel Schegloff. 1987. Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. Graham Button and John R.E. Lee, 153–205. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  36. Kuipers, Giselinde. 2008. The sociology of humor. In The primer of humor research, ed. Victor Raskin, 8:361–98. Humor Research. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  37. Kuipers, Giselinde. 2015. Good humor, bad taste: A sociology of the joke. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  38. Kutz-Flamenbaum, Rachel V. 2014. Humor and social movements. Sociology Compass 8 (3): 294–304.Google Scholar
  39. Lamont, Michèle, and Virág Molnár. 2002. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 167–195.Google Scholar
  40. Larsen, Timothy. 2007. Defining and locating evangelicalism. In The Cambridge companion to evangelical theology, ed. Timothy Larsen and Daniel J. Treier, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. LeDrew, Stephen. 2015. The evolution of atheism: The politics of a modern movement. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lindsay, D. Michael. 2007. Faith in the halls of power: How evangelicals joined the American elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Martin, Rod A. 2007. The psychology of humor an integrative approach. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Martin, Rod A., Patricia Puhlik-Doris, Gwen Larsen, Jeanette Gray, and Kelly Weir. 2003. Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality 37 (1): 48–75.Google Scholar
  45. Merton, Robert King. 1968. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  46. Meyer, John C. 2000. Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory 10 (3): 310–331.Google Scholar
  47. Mulkay, Michael J. 1988. On humour: Its nature and its place in modern society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  48. Naples, Nancy A. 1996. A feminist revisiting of the insider/outsider debate: The ‘outsider phenomenon’ in rural Iowa. Qualitative Sociology 19 (1): 83–106.Google Scholar
  49. Oring, Elliott. 2003. Engaging humor. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  50. Owens, Timothy J., Dawn T. Robinson, and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 2010. Three faces of identity. Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 477–499.Google Scholar
  51. Pew Research Center. 2015. America’s changing religious landscape. http://www.pewforum.org/files/2015/05/RLS-08-26-full-report.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2016.
  52. Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  53. Robinson, Dawn T., and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 2001. Getting a laugh: Gender, status, and humor in task discussions. Social Forces 80 (1): 123–158.Google Scholar
  54. Rosenberg, Morris. 1979. Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  55. Sacks, Harvey. 1974. An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, ed. Richard Bauman and Joel Sherzer, 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Smirnova, Michelle. 2014. What is the shortest Russian joke? Communism. Russian cultural consciousness expressed through Soviet humor. Qualitative Sociology 37 (3): 323–343.Google Scholar
  57. Smith, Christian. 1998. American evangelicalism: Embattled and thriving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, Jesse M. 2011. Becoming an atheist in America: Constructing identity and meaning from the rejection of theism. Sociology of Religion 72 (2): 215–237.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, Jesse M. 2013. Creating a godless community: The collective identity work of contemporary American atheists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52 (1): 80–99.Google Scholar
  60. Stieger, Stefan, Anton K. Formann, and Christoph Burger. 2011. Humor styles and their relationship to explicit and implicit self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences 50 (5): 747–750.Google Scholar
  61. Sumerau, Jason E., and Ryan T. Cragun. 2016. ‘I think some people need religion’: The social construction of nonreligious moral identities. Sociology of Religion 77 (4): 386–407.Google Scholar
  62. Swidler, Ann. 2001. Talk of love : How culture matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Terrion, Jenepher Lennox, and Blake E. Ashforth. 2002. From ‘I’ to ‘we’: The role of putdown humor and identity in the development of a temporary group. Human Relations 55 (1): 55–88.Google Scholar
  64. Tsakona, Villy, and Diana Elena Popa. 2011. Humour in politics and the politics of humour: An introduction. In Studies in political humor: In between political critique and public entertainment, ed. Villy Tsakona and Diana Elena Popa, 1–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  65. Turner, John C., Penelope J. Oakes, S. Alexander Haslam, and Craig McGarty. 1994. Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20 (5): 454–463.Google Scholar
  66. Williamson, David A., and George Yancey. 2013. There is no god: Atheists in America. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  67. Woodberry, Robert D., and Christian S. Smith. 1998. Fundamentalism et al: Conservative protestants in America. Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1): 25–56.Google Scholar
  68. Zuckerman, Phil. 2012. Faith no more: Why people reject religion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017
Corrected publication October/2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations