Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 583–599 | Cite as

Vanishing Act: Non-straight Identity Narratives of Women in Relationships with Women and Men

  • Ahoo TabatabaiEmail author
  • Annulla Linders


This research examines how women who experience a change to a partner of a different gender make sense of this shift both to themselves and to others. Specifically, the study draws on 32 interviews conducted with self-identified lesbian, bisexual and queer women who have moved from relationships with female partners to relationships with male partners. None of the women interviewed sought to identify themselves as straight or heterosexual. Many, instead, tried to negotiate non-straight identities. We conclude that women, in doing their non-straight identities, mainly rely upon a strategy of narrative, including narratives of attraction, choice of men and challenging homophobia.


Sexuality Narratives Identity 



We thank the participants who so generously shared their stories with us. This research was made possible by a dissertation fellowship from the Charles P. Taft Research Center, University of Cincinnati. We thank David Smilde, Rebecca Hanson, and the anonymous reviewers, at Qualitative Sociology. We also thank the following colleagues for their useful insights: Steve Carlton-Ford, Erynn Masi de Casanova, Stephan Groschwitz, Jaime McCauley and Rhys H. Williams.


  1. Baudrillard, J. 1995. The gulf war did not take place. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bauman, Z. 1996. From pilgrim to tourist—or a short history of identity. In Questions of cultural identity, ed. S. Hall and P. du Gay, 18–36. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. 2009. Identity in the globalizing world. In Identity in question, ed. A. Elliott and P. du Gay, 1–12. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gernsheim. 1995. The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. 1988. Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal 40(4): 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Christina, G. 1997. Loaded words. In PoMoSexuals: Challenging assumptions about gender and sexuality, ed. C. Queen and L. Schimel, 29–35. San Francisco: Cleis.Google Scholar
  8. Connell, R.W. 1985. Theorizing gender. Sociology 19: 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connell, R.W. 2005. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, J.E. 2000. Not dead yet: Psychotherapy, morality, and the question of identity dissolution. In Identity and social change, ed. J.E. Davis, 155–178. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  11. Denzin, N.K. 1991. Images of postmodern society: Social theory and contemporary cinema. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Diamond, L.M. 2009. Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Elliott, A., and P. du Gay. 2009. Identity in question. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Erikson, E.H. 1968. Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  15. Esterberg, K.G. 1997. Lesbian and bisexual identities: Constructing communities, constructing selves. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ezzy, D. 1998. Theorizing narrative identity: Symbolic interactionism and hermeneutics. Sociological Quarterly 39: 239–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gagnon, J.H., and S. William. 1973. Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  18. Garro, L.C., and C. Mattingly. 2000. Narrative as construct and construction. In Narrative and the cultural construction of illness and healing, ed. C. Mattingly and L.C. Garro, 1–49. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gergen, K.J. 1995. The healthy, happy human being wears many masks. In The truth about the truth: De-confusing and de-constructing the postmodern world, ed. W.T. Anderson, 136–144. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.Google Scholar
  20. Gergen, K.J. 2000. The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Gergen, K.J., and M.M. Gergen. 1997. Narratives of the self. In Memory, identity, community: The idea of narrative in the human sciences, ed. L.P. Hinchman, 161–184. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  22. Glaser, B.G., and A.L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  23. Goffman, E. 1974. Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, S. 1996. Who needs identity. In Questions of cultural identity, ed. H. Stuart and P. du Gay, 1–17. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Halttunen, K. 1982. Confidence men and painted women: A study of middle-class culture in America, 1830–1870. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Heasley, R. 2005. Queer masculinities of straight men. Men and Masculinities 7: 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holstein, J.A., and J.F. Gubrium. 2000. The self we live by: Narrative identity in a postmodern world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jamison, L. 1998. Intimacy: Personal relationships in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  29. Kempny, M. 2002. Introduction: On identity, fixity, and change in social theory and social life under globalized conditions. In Identity in transformation: Postmodernity, postcommunism, and globalization, ed. M. Kempny and A. Jawlowska, 1–16. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  30. Kessler, S.J., and W. McKenna. 1978. Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lamont, M. 2001. Culture and identity. In Handbook of sociological theory, ed. J.H. Turner, 171–185. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Layder, D. 2007. Self-identity and personhood in social analysis: The inadequacies of postmodernism and social constructionism. In Reconstructing postmodernism: Critical debates, ed. J.L. Powell and T. Owens, 3–14. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Levi-Strauss, C. 1966. The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lifton, R.J. 1995. The protean style. In The truth about the truth: De-confusing and de constructing the postmodern world, ed. W.T. Anderson, 130–135. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.Google Scholar
  35. Lyotard, J.-F. 1984. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  36. Martin, P.Y. 2004. Gender as social institution. Social Forces 82(4): 1249–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Menasche, A.E. 1999. Leaving the life: Lesbians, ex-lesbians and the heterosexual imperative. London: Only Women.Google Scholar
  38. Nyland, D. 2004. When in Rome: Heterosexism, homophobia, and sports talk radio. Journal of Sports and Social Issues 28: 136–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Brien, M. 2002. An essay on the fluidity of identity. In Identity in transformation: Postmodernity, postcommunism, and globalization, ed. M. Kempny and A. Jawlowska, 40. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  40. Pascoe, C.J. 2007. Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Plummer, K. 2003. Queers, bodies and postmodern sexualities: A note on revisiting the ‘sexual’ in symbolic interactionism. Qualitative Sociology 26: 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Queen, C., and L. Schimel (eds.). 1997. PoMoSexuals: Challenging assumptions about gender and sexuality. San Francisco: Cleis.Google Scholar
  43. Raymond, K. 1997. In PoMoSexuals: Challenging assumptions about gender and sexuality, ed. C. Queen and L. Schimel, 53–61. San Francisco: Cleis.Google Scholar
  44. Rich, A. 1980. Compulsive heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs 5: 631–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rothblum, E. 2000. Sexual orientation and sex in women’s lives: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Social Issues 56: 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rowe, A. 2005. BeLonging: Toward a feminist politics of relation. NWSA Journal 17(2): 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Savin-Williams, R.C., and L. Diamond. 2000. Sexual identity trajectories among sexual-minority youths: Gender comparisons. Archives of Sexual Behavior 29: 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schafter, E.P. 2005. Erikson meets the postmodern: Can classic identity theory rise to the challenge? Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research 5(2): 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schilt, K., and L. Westbrook. 2009. Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: “Gender Normals”, transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender & Society 29(4): 440–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwalbe, M., and D. Mason-Schrock. 1996. Identity work as group process. Advances in Group Processes 13: 113–147.Google Scholar
  51. Simon, W. 1996. Postmodern sexualities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Simon, W., and J.H. Gagnon. 2000. Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology 26(4): 491–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stein, A., and K. Plummer. 1994. I can’t even think straight: “Queer”. Theory and the missing sexual revolution in sociology. Sociological Theory 12(2): 178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Swidler, A. 2001. Talk of love: How culture matters. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Tabatabai, A. 2010. Protecting the lesbian border: The tension between individual and communal authenticity. Sexualities 13(5): 563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ward, J. 2008. Dude-sex: White masculinities and “authentic” heterosexuality among dudes who have sex with dudes. Sexualities 11: 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ward, J., and B. Schneider. 2009. The reaches of heteronormativity. Gender & Society 23(4): 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. West, C., and D.H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender and Society 1: 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wittig, M. 1992. The straight mind. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  60. Wolkomir, M. 2009. Making heteronormative reconciliations: The story of romantic love, sexuality, and gender in mixed-orientation marriages. Gender & Society 23(4): 494–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and SociologyColumbia CollegeColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations