My Auto/Ethnographic Dilemma: Who Owns the Story?
This article explores ethical issues of co-mingled data, demarcating the field and informed consent in a study researching the consequences of Christian fundamentalist ideology on the lives of “Bible Belt gays”. When what constitutes informed consent is ambiguous, how does the qualitative researcher justify her decision either to include or exclude meaningful data? To illustrate these ethical issues, I analyze four instances of co-mingled data, two featuring Christian fundamentalists and two Bible Belt gays, in which I gain theoretical insights under conditions of blurry consent, and weigh potential harm to subjects against the liberatory goals of the project.
KeywordsEthics Autoethnography Consent Fieldwork
- Angrosino, M. V., & Mays de Perez, K. A. (2003). Rethinking observation: From method to context. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 107–154). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Barton, B. (2006). Stripped: Inside the lives of exotic dancers. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Barton, B. (forthcoming). Pray the gay away: Religion and homosexuality in the Bible Belt. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Blee, K. M. (1991). Women of the Klan: Racism and gender in the 1920s. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Blee, K. M. (2009). Access and methods in research on hidden communities: Reflections on studying U.S. organized racism. eSharp, “Critical Issues in Researching Hidden Communities,” 10–27.Google Scholar
- Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc.Google Scholar
- Finch, J. (1984). “It’s great to have someone to talk to”: The ethics and politics of interviewing women. In C. Bell & H. Roberts (Eds.), Social researching: Politics, problems, practice (pp. 70–87). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Frye, M. (1983). The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory. Freedom: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes of the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Gray, M. (2009). Out in the country: Youth, media, and queer visibility in rural America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Henley, N., & Pincus, F. (1978). Interrelationship of sexist, racist, and antihomosexual attitudes. Psychological Reports, 42, 83–90.Google Scholar
- Johnston, L. (2010). The place of secrets, silences and sexualities in the research process. In R. Ryan-Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections (pp. 291–305). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Linneman, T. J. (2003). Weathering change: Gays, lesbians, Christian conservatives, and everyday hostilities. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Moon, D. (2004). God & politics: Homosexuality and everyday theologies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- O’Brien, K. (2010). Inside “doorwork”: Gendering the security gaze. In R. Ryan-Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections (pp. 117–132). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Paulson, M. (2009, March 9). Number of N.E. Catholics tumbles: Study finds ethnic, geographic transformation. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/03/09/number_of_ne_catholics_tumbles/.
- Sedgwick, E. K. (1993). Epistemology of the closet. In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale, & D. M. Halperin (Eds.), The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 45–61). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Stein, A. (2001). The stranger next door: The story of a small community’s battle over sex, faith, and civil rights. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
- Wolcott, H. F. (2005). The art of fieldwork (2nd ed.). Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
- Wolf, D. (1996). Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Wolkomir, M. (2006). Be not deceived: The sacred and sexual struggles of gay and ex-gay Christian men. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar