Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 575–581 | Cite as

Modernity and Social Knowledge Reconsidered: On John R. Hall’s Apocalypse

  • Isaac Ariail Reed

Apocalypse: From Antiquity to the Empire of Modernity. By John R. Hall. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. 2009. ISBN 0745645097. 296 pages, $69.95 (cloth).

Whatever one thinks of the classics of social theory as defined by canonization, two arguments about Marx, Weber, and Durkheim are both ubiquitous, and, on a surface level at least, clearly true. First: the classical social theorists were both products of, and developed theories about, Western European modernity. Second, that the founders of what we now call social theory also pursued intense empirical research agendas. Thus myriad commentaries on social theory, intellectual biographies of social theorists, and even some textbooks make three interrelated claims about the classical theorists: Marx, Durkheim, and Weber lived through and experienced, developed abstract theories of, and pursued research in and about“modernity,” and, in particular, modern Western Europe from the advent of capitalism through industrialization to (in the case...


Social Knowledge Social Theory Causal Efficacy Strategic Time American Modernity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The author would like to thank Jennifer Bair and Claire Decoteau for critical discussion during the writing of this review.


  1. Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Fundamentalism, sectarianism, and revolution: The Jacobin dimension of modernity. Cambridge: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Geertz, C. (2000). Ideology as a cultural system. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Gross, N. (2008). Richard Rorty: The making of an American philosopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hall, J. R. (2009). Apocalypse: From antiquity to the empire of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  5. Lincoln, B. (2003). Holy terrors: Thinking about religion after September 11. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Reed, I. (2010). Epistemology contextualized: Social-scientific knowledge in a post-positivist era. Sociological Theory, 28, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wylie, A. (2003). Why standpoint matters. In R. Figueroa & S. Harding (Eds.), Science and other cultures. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations