Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 287–306 | Cite as

Cowboy of the World? Gender Discourse and the Iraq War Debate



In this article we examine the debate preceding the most recent war in Iraq to show how gendered framing can compromise the quality of debate. Drawing on a sample of national news discourse in the year before the war began, we show that both anti-war and pro-war speakers draw on binary images of gender to construct their cases for or against war. Speakers cast the Bush administration’s argument for invasion either as a correct “macho” stance or as inappropriate, out-of-control masculinity. The most prominent gendered image in war debate is that of the cowboy, used to characterize both President Bush and US foreign policy in general. The cowboy is positioned against a diplomatic form of masculinity that is associated with Europe and valued by anti-war speakers, but criticized by pro-war speakers. Articles that draw on gender images show a lower quality of the debate, measured by the extent to which reasons rather than ad hominem arguments are used to support or rebut assertions.


Gender Iraq war News debate Cowboy masculinity 


  1. Alexander, J. (2004). From the depths of despair: Performance, counterperformance, and “September 11”. Sociological Theory, 22, 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, J., & Smith, P. (1993). The discourse of American civil society: A new proposal for cultural studies. Theory and Society, 22, 151–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banaji, M. R., & Dasgupta, N. (1998). The consciousness of social beliefs: A program of research on stereotyping and prejudice. In V. Y. Yzerbyt, G. Lories, & B. Dardenne (Eds.), Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, L. (2001). News: The politics of illusion. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  5. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, J. A., & Ferree, M. M. (2005). Close your eyes and think of England: Pronatalism in the British print media. Gender and Society, 19, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, M. E. (2004). Rhetoric, patriarchy & war: Explaining the dangers of “leadership” in mass culture. Women and Language, 27, 21–28.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, D., & Nagel, J. (2001). White men, red masks: Appropriations of “Indian” manhood in imagined Wests. In M. Basso, L. McCall, & D. Garceau (Eds.), Across the great divide: Cultures of manhood in the American West. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cohn, C. (1987). Sex and death in the rational world of defense intellectuals. Signs, 12, 687–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohn, C. (1993). Wars, wimps, and women: Talking gender and thinking war. In M. Cooke, & A. Woollacott (Eds.), Gendering war talk. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender & power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender: Short introductions. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Corkin, S. (2004). Cowboys as cold warriors: The western and US history. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Desmond, M. (2007). On the fire line: Living and dying with wildland firefighters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Drew, J. (2004). Identity crisis: Gender, public discourse, and 9/11. Women and Language, 27, 71–78.Google Scholar
  17. Einwohner, R. (1999). Gender, class, and social movement outcomes: Identity and effectiveness in two animal rights campaigns. Gender and Society, 13, 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Enloe, C. (1990). Bananas, beaches, and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Enloe, C. (1993). The morning after: Sexual politics at the end of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ferree, M. M. (2003). Resonance and radicalism: Feminist framing in the abortion debates of the United States and Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 304–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Garceau, D. (2001). Nomads, bunkies, cross-dressers, and family men. In M. Basso, L. McCall, & D. Garceau (Eds.), Across the great divide: Cultures of manhood in the American West. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Gitlin, T. (2003). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hoganson, K. (1998). Fighting for American manhood: How gender politics provoked the Spanish-American Wars. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kagan, R. (2002). Power and weakness. Policy Review, 113, 3–28.Google Scholar
  27. Kimmel, M. (1996). Manhood in America: A cultural history. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review, 91, 1053–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Snow, D. A. (2004). Framing processes, ideology, and discursive fields. In D. A. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, D. E. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  32. Stone, D. (1988). Policy paradox and political reason. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
  33. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wade, L. (2006). “Female genital mutilation” in the American imagination. Sociology. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  35. Young, I. M. (2003). The logic of masculinist protection: Reflections on the current security state. Signs, 29, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender & nation. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations