Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 41–60

All the News that’s Fat to Print: The American “Obesity Epidemic” and the Media

Original Paper

Abstract

In the last twenty years scientific, medical, and public health interest in obesity has skyrocketed. Increasingly the term “epidemic” is being used in the media, medical journals, and public health policy literature to describe the current prevalence of fatness in the U.S. Using social scientific literature on epidemics, social problems, and feminist theories of the body, this paper traces the historical emergence of the “obesity epidemic” through an analysis of 751 articles on obesity published in The New York Times between 1990 and 2001. Through the identification and analysis of three discursive pairings I argue that the “obesity epidemic” is a part of a new breed of what I call “post-modern epidemics,” epidemics in which unevenly medicalized phenomena lacking a clear pathological basis get cast in the language and moral panic of “traditional” epidemics. I show how this moral panic together with the location of the problem within the individual precludes a more macro level approach to health and health care delivery at a time when health care services are being dismantled or severely cut back.

Keywords

Obesity Epidemic Medicalization Public health Risk 

References

  1. Bartky, S. (1997). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In D. Tietjens-Meyers (Ed.), Feminist social thought: A reader (pp. 92–111). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bauer, M. (1998). The medicalization of science news: From the ‘rocket-scalpel’ to the ‘gene-meteorite’ complex. Social Science Information, 37, 731–751.Google Scholar
  3. Best, J. (1989). Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  4. Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brumberg, J. (1998). The body project: An intimate history of American girls. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  6. Campos, P. (2004). The obesity myth: Why America’s obsession with weight is hazardous for your health. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar
  7. Chernin, K. (1981). The obsession: Reflections on the tyranny of slenderness. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, A. (2003). Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 553–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke, A., Shim, J., Mamo, L., Fosket, J., & Fishman, J. (2003). Biomedicalization: technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review, 68, 161–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conrad, P. (1992). Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology, 1992, 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. (1992). Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  12. DeVault, M. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Eckerman, L. (1994). Foucault, embodiment and gendered subjectivities: The case of voluntary self-starvation. In A. Peterson, & R. Bunton (Eds.), Foucault, health, and medicine (pp. 151–169). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Epstein, S. (1995). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ehrenreich, B., & English, D. (1978). For her own good: 150 years of the experts’ advice to women. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1984). Technologies of the self. In L. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  18. Gaesser, G. (2002). Big fat lies: The truth about your weight and your health. Carlsbad: Gurze Books.Google Scholar
  19. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media and the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Glaser, B. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1, 1–30.Google Scholar
  21. Glassner, B. (2000). The culture of fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  24. Karpf, A. (1988). Doctoring the media: The reporting of health and medicine. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Lantz, P., & Booth, K. (1998). The social construction of the breast cancer epidemic. Social Science & Medicine, 46, 907–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Luker, K. (1996). Dubious conceptions: The politics of teenage pregnancy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Millman, M. (1988). Such a pretty face: Being fat in America. New York: Berkeley Books.Google Scholar
  30. Orbach, S. (1978). Fat is a feminist issue. New York: Berkley Books.Google Scholar
  31. Ortner, S. (1986). Is female to nature as male is to culture? In M. Rosaldo, & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Woman, culture and society (pp. 67–87). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Poulton, T. (1997). No fat chicks: How big business profits from making women hate their bodies and how to fight back. New York: Birch Lane Press.Google Scholar
  33. Riessman, C. (1983). Women and medicalization: A new perspective. Social Policy, 14, 3–18.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenberg, C. (1962). The cholera years: The United States in 1832, 1849, and 1866. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rosenberg, C. (1992). Explaining epidemics and other studies in the history of medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schwartz, H. (1986). Never satisfied: A cultural history of diets, fantasies, and fat. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Sobal, J. (1995). The medicalization and demedicalization of obesity. In D. Maurer, & J. Sobal (Eds.), Eating agendas: Food and nutrition as social problems (pp. 67–90). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  38. Sobal, J. (1999). The size acceptance movement and the social construction of body weight. In D. Maurer, & J. Sobal (Eds.), Weighty issues: Fatness and thinness as social problems (pp. 231–249). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  39. Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. (1977). Constructing social problems. Menlo Park: Cummings Press.Google Scholar
  40. Spitzack, C. (1990). Confessing excess: Women and the politics of body reduction. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  41. Stack, C. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  42. Stearns, P. (1997). Fat history: Bodies and beauty in the modern west. London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Strauss, A. (1995). Notes on the nature and development of general theories. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 7–18.Google Scholar
  44. Treichler, P. (1999). How to have theory in an epidemic: Cultural chronicles of AIDS. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Valverde, M. (1998). Diseases of the will: Alcohol and the dilemmas of freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Wann, M. (1998). Fat!So?: Because you don’t have to apologize for your size. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press.Google Scholar
  47. Zola, I. (1972). Medicine as an institution of social control. Sociological Review, 20, 487–504.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Assistant Professor of Sociology, Dudley Moorhead Hall 241 One Washington SquareSan José State UniversitySan JoséUSA

Personalised recommendations