Advertisement

Plant Foods for Human Nutrition

, Volume 69, Issue 3, pp 209–215 | Cite as

Allergenicity Assessment of Genetically-modified Tobacco Expressing Salt Tolerance cbl Gene

  • Alok Kumar Verma
  • Sandeep Kumar
  • Bhushan P. Chaudhari
  • Narendra Tuteja
  • Mukul Das
  • Premendra D. DwivediEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

It is mandatory to assess the allergenic potential of genetically modified (GM) crops before their commercialization. Recently, a transgene [Calcineurin B-like (CBL) protein] has been introduced into tobacco plant to make the crop salt resistance. Therefore, it was felt necessary to assess the allergenic potential of the cbl gene product, which was introduced and expressed in Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) plant and compared the allergenic effects with the wild-type (WT) counterpart. Bioinformatic analysis revealed that there was no significant sequence homology with known allergens. Also, no difference between the protein digestibility profiles of GM and WT tobacco was found. Rapid digestion of CBL protein (Mol Wt 35 kDa) by simulated gastric fluid (SGF) indicated reduced chances of this protein to induce allergenicity. In addition, BALB/c mice sensitized by intraperitoneal administration of WT and GM tobacco protein showed comparable levels of clinical score, specific IgE, IgG1, histamine level, similar effect on different organs as well as IgE binding proteins. These findings indicate that insertion of cbl gene in tobacco did not cause any additional allergic risk to consumer and the GM and native tobacco proteins behave similarly in both in vitro and in vivo situations even after genetic modification.

Keywords

Allergy GM crops cbl gene Simulated gastric fluid Murine model 

Abbreviations

Mol Wt

Molecular weight

WT

Wild type

CBL

Calcineurin B-like

GM

Genetically modified

SGF

Simulated gastric fluid

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Director of the Institute for support and interest in carrying out this study. This work was financially supported by research project In-Depth (BSC-0111) of Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India. We convey gratitude to Academy of Scientific & Innovative Research (AcSIR), New Delhi. AKV and SK are thankful to CSIR, New Delhi for the award of their Senior Research Fellowships. This is CSIR-IITR manuscript no-3234.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11130_2014_435_MOESM1_ESM.doc (5.2 mb)
ESM 1 (DOC 5296 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Stewart GG (1967) A history of the medicinal use of tobacco. 1492–1860. Med Hist 11:228–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golldack D, Li C, Mohan H, Probst N (2014) Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: unraveling the signaling networks. Front Plant Sci 5:151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta B, Huang B (2014) Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. Int J Genomics 2014:18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roy SJ, Negrão S, Tester M (2014) Salt resistant crop plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 26:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilroy S, Trewavas A (2001) Signal processing and transduction in plant cells: the end of the beginning? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harper JF, Breton G, Harmon A (2004) Decoding Ca (2+) signals through plant protein kinases. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:263–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scrase-Field SA, Knight MR (2003) Calcium: just a chemical switch? Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:500–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu J, Zhu JK (1998) A calcium sensor homolog required for plant salt tolerance. Science 280:1943–1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kudla J, Xu Q, Harter K, Gruissem W, Luan S (1999) Genes for calcineurin B-like proteins in Arabidopsis are differentially regulated by stress signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:4718–4723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shi J, Kim KN, Ritz O, Albrecht V, Gupta R, Harter K, Luana S, Kudlab J (1999) Novel protein kinases associated with calcineurin B-like calcium sensors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11:2393–2405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hashimoto K, Eckert C, Anschütz U, Scholz M, Held K, Waadt R, Reyer A, Hippler M, Becker D, Kudla J (2012) Phosphorylation of calcineurin B-like (CBL) calcium sensor proteins by their CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) is required for full activity of CBL-CIPK complexes toward their target proteins. J Biol Chem 287:7956–7968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kolukisaoglu U, Weinl S, Blazevic D, Batistic O, Kudla J (2004) Calcium sensors and their interacting protein kinases: genomics of the Arabidopsis and rice CBL-CIPK signaling networks. Plant Physiol 134:43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Metcalfe DD, Astwood JD, Townsend R, Sampson HA, Taylor SL, Fuchs RL (1996) Assessment of the allergenic potential of foods derived from genetically engineered crop plants. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 36:S165–S186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Konig A, Cockburn A, Crevel RW, Debruyne E, Grafstroem R, Hammerling U, Kimber I, Knudsen I, Kuiper HA, Peijnenburg AA, Penninks AH, Poulsen M, Schauzu M, Wal JM (2004) Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops. Food Chem Toxicol 42:1047–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ballabio C, Magni C, Restani P, Mottini M, Fiocchi A, Tedeschi G, Duranti M (2010) IgE-mediated cross-reactivity among leguminous seed proteins in peanut allergic children. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 65:396–402Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li XM, Schofield BH, Huang CK, Kleiner GI, Sampson HA (1999) A murine model of IgE-mediated cow’s milk hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 103:206–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Misra A, Kumar R, Mishra V, Chaudhari BP, Raisuddin S, Das M, Dwivedi PD (2011) Potential allergens of green gram (Vigna radiata L. Millsp) identified as members of cupin superfamily and seed albumin. Clin Exp Allergy 41:1157–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Misra A, Kumar R, Mishra V, Chaudhari BP, Tripathi A, Das M, Dwivedi PD (2010) Partial characterization of red gram (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp) polypeptides recognized by patients exhibiting rhinitis and bronchial asthma. Food Chem Toxicol 48:2725–2736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Verma AK, Kumar S, Das M, Dwivedi PD (2012) Impact of thermal processing on legume allergens. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 67:430–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Codex Alimentarius (2009) Foods derived from modern biotechnology. FAO/WHO, Rome, pp 1–85Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Astwood JD, Leach JN, Fuchs RL (1996) Stability of food allergens to digestion in vitro. Nat Biotechnol 14:1269–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fu TJ, Upasana RA, Catherine HJ (2002) Digestibility of food allergens and nonallergenic proteins in simulated gastric fluid and simulated intestinal fluids: a comparative study. J Agric Food Chem 50:7154–7160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    DBT (2008) Protocols for food and feed safety assessment of GE crops, Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar S, Verma AK, Misra A, Tripathi A, Chaudhari BP, Prasad R, Jain SK, Das M, Dwivedi PD (2011) Allergenic responses of red kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris cv chitra) polypeptides in BALB/c mice recognized by bronchial asthma and allergic rhinitis patients. Food Res Int 44:2868–2879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Katayama S, Mine Y (2006) Quillaja saponin can modulate ovalbumin-induced IgE allergic responses through regulation of Th1/Th2 balance in a murine model. J Agric Food Chem 54:3271–3276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Metzger H (1991) The high affinity receptor for IgE on mast cells. Clin Exp Allergy 21:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    O’Byrne PM (1999) Inhaled corticosteroid therapy in newly detected mild asthma. Drugs 58:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Koyasu S (2012) Natural helper cells and TH2-type innate immunity. Cornea 31(Suppl 1):S20–S24. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318269cb1a CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alok Kumar Verma
    • 1
    • 4
  • Sandeep Kumar
    • 1
  • Bhushan P. Chaudhari
    • 2
  • Narendra Tuteja
    • 3
  • Mukul Das
    • 1
    • 4
  • Premendra D. Dwivedi
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Food, Drug and Chemical Toxicology GroupCSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research LucknowIndia
  2. 2.Pathology LaboratoryCSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research (CSIR-IITR)LucknowIndia
  3. 3.International Centre for Genetic Engineering and BiotechnologyNew DelhiIndia
  4. 4.Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-IITRLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations