Advertisement

Comments on “identification and semiparametric estimation of a finite horizon dynamic discrete choice model with a terminating action”

  • Øystein Daljord
  • Denis Nekipelov
  • Minjung ParkEmail author
Article

Abstract

Bajari et al. (Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 14(4), 271–323, 2016) showed conditions under which the discount factor is identified in a finite horizon optimal stopping problem. We show that these conditions can be cast as a special case of a class of exclusion restrictions which are relevant for a broader scope of applications, and extend the identification result to both finite horizon and infinite horizon optimal stopping problems under more general exclusion restrictions. We also show how a similar approach gives identification of general discount functions in finite horizon optimal stopping problems. The identification results directly suggest estimators of the discount functions that are easy to compute.

JEL Classification

C14 C50 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Park gratefully acknowledges the support provided by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant 2018S1A5A2A01029529.

References

  1. Abbring, J., & Daljord, O. (2018). Identifying the discount factor in dynamic discrete choice models. Mimeo: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Arcidiacono, P., & Miller, R.A. (2011). Conditional choice probability estimation of dynamic discrete choice models with unobserved heterogeneity. Econometrica, 79 (6), 1823–1867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arcidiacono, P., & Miller, R.A. (2018). Identifying dynamic discrete choice models off short panels. Cambridge: Working paper.Google Scholar
  4. Bajari, P., Chu, C.S., Nekipelov, D., Park, M. (2016). Identification and semiparametric estimation of a finite horizon dynamic discrete choice model with a terminating action. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 14(4), 271–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Groote, O., & Verboven, F. (2019). Subsidies and myopia in technology adoption: Evidence from solar photovoltaic systems. Forthcoming american economic review.Google Scholar
  6. Fang, H., & Wang, Y. (2015). Estimating dynamic discrete choice models with hyperbolic discounting, with an application to mammography decisions. International Economic Review, 56(2), 565–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hotz, V.J., & Miller, R.A. (1993). Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kalouptsidi, M., Scott, P.T., Souza-Rodrigues, E. (2018). Linear iv regression estimators for structural dynamic discrete choice models. Working paper: Harvard University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee, R. (2013). Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. American Economic Review, 103(7), 2960–3000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Magnac, T., & Thesmar, D. (2002). Identifying dynamic discrete choice processes. Econometrica, 70, 801–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Norets, A., & Takahashi, S. (2013). On the surjectivity of the mapping between utilities and choice probabilities. Quantitative Economics, 4, 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999). Doing it now or later. American Economic Review, 89(1), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Phelps, E., & Pollak, R.A. (1968). On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. Review of Economic Studies, 35(2), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rust, J. (1987). Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: An empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica, 55, 999–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rust, J. (1994). Structural estimation of Markov decision processes. In Engle, R., & McFadden, D. (Eds.) Handbook of econometrics, (Vol. 4 pp. 3081–3143). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  17. Strotz, R.H. (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies, 23(3), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Booth School of BusinessUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Economics and Computer ScienceUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsEwha Womans UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations