Quantitative Marketing and Economics

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 1–58 | Cite as

Dynamic effects of price promotions: field evidence, consumer search, and supply-side implications

  • Andrés Elberg
  • Pedro M. GardeteEmail author
  • Rosario Macera
  • Carlos Noton


This paper investigates the dynamic effects of price promotions in a retail setting through the use of a large-scale field experiment varying the promotion depths of 170 products across 17 categories in 10 supermarkets of a major retailer in Chile. In the intervention phase of the experiment, treated customers were exposed to deep discounts (approximately 30%), whereas control customers were exposed to shallow discounts (approximately 10%). In the subsequent measurement phase, the promotion schedule held discount levels constant across groups. We find that treated customers were 22.4% more likely to buy promoted items than their control counterparts, despite facing the same promotional deals. Strikingly, the magnitude of the dynamic effects of price promotions (when promotional depths are equal across conditions) is 61% of the promotional effects induced by offering shallow vs. deep discounts during the intervention phase. The result is robust to other concurrent dynamic forces, including consumer stockpiling behavior and state dependence. We use the experimental variation and historical promotional activities to inform a demand-side model in which consumers search for deals, and a supply-side model in which firms compete for those consumers. We find that small manufacturers can benefit from heightened promotion sensitivity by using promotions to induce future consideration. However, when unit margins are high, heightened promotion sensitivity leads to fierce competition, making all firms worse off.


Price promotions Dynamic effects Consumer search Bertrand supertraps Field experiments 


  1. Anderson, E.T., & Simester, D.I. (2004). Long-Run Effects of promotion depth on new versus established customers: Three field studies. Marketing Science, 23(1), 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G.S., Grossman, M., Murphy, K.M. (1991). Rational addiction and the effect of price on consumption. American Economic Review, 81(2), 237–241.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G.S., & Murphy, K.M. (1988). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4), 675–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust Differences-In-Differences estimates?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blattberg, R.C., Briesch, R., Fox, E.J. (1995). How promotions work. Marketing Science, 14(3), G122–G132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolton, R.N. (1989). The relationship between market characteristics and promotional price elasticities. Marketing Science, 8, 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulding, W., Lee, E., Staelin, R. (1995). Mastering the mix: do advertising, promotion and sales force activities lead to differentiation. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Briesch, R.A., Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T., Raj, S.P. (1997). A comparative analysis of reference price models. Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (2), 202–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronnenberg, B.J., Kim, J.B., Mela, C.F. (2016). Zooming in on choice: How do consumers search for cameras online?. Marketing Science, 35(5), 693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cabral, L.M., & Villas-Boas, M. (2005). Bertrand supertraps. Management Science, 51(4), 599–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cameron, A.C., Gelbach, J.B., Miller, D.L. (2008). Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(3), 414–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cameron, A.C., & Miller, D.L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50, 317–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chan, T., Narasimhan, C., Zhang, Q. (2008). Decomposing promotional effects with a dynamic structural model of flexible consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(4), 487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choi, M., Dai, A.Y., Kim, K. (2018). Consumer search and price competition. Econometrica, 86(4), 1257–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, S.J., Inman, J., McAlister, L. (1992). Promotion has a Negative Effect on Brand Evaluations-Or Does it? Additional Disconforming Evidence. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 143–148.Google Scholar
  16. Dodson, J.A., Tybout, A.M., Sternthal, B. (1978). Impact of deals and deal retraction on brand switching. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(1), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dube, J. -P., Hitsch, G.J., Rossi, P.E. (2010). State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. The RAND Journal of Economics, 41 (3), 417–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ehrenberg, A.S.C., Hammond, K., Goodhardt, G.J. (1994). The After-Effects of Price-Related consumer promotions. Journal of Advertising Research, 34(4), 11–21.Google Scholar
  19. Erdem, T., Imai, S., Keane, M.P. (2003). Brand and quantity choice dynamics under price uncertainty. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 1(1), 5–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Erdem, T., Keane, M.P., Sun, B. (2008). A dynamic model of brand choice when price and advertising signal product quality. Marketing Science, 27(6), 1111–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freimer, M., & Horsky, D. (2008). Try it, you will like it - Does consumer learning lead to competitive price promotions?. Marketing Science, 27(5), 796–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gedenk, K., & Neslin, S.A. (1999). The role of retail promotion in determining future brand loyalty: Its effect on purchase event feedback. Journal of Retailing, 75 (4), 433–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gedenk, K., Neslin, S.A., Ailawadi, K.L. (2010). Sales Promotion in: Retailing in the 21st Century: Current and Future Trends. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Eds.Google Scholar
  24. Guadagni, P.M., & Little, J.D. (1983). A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Science, 2(3), 203–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hauser, J.R., & Wernerfelt, B. (1990). An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Honka, E. (2014). Quantifying search and switching costs in the US auto insurance industry. The RAND Journal of Economics, 45(4), 847–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Honka, E., & Chintagunta, P. (2017). Simultaneous or Sequential? Search Strategies in the U.S. Auto Insurance Industry. Marketing Science, 36(1), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Imbens, G. (2011). Experimental design for unit and cluster randomized trials, 3ie, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.Google Scholar
  29. Imbens, G., & Kolesar, M. (2015). Robust Standard Errors in Small Samples: Some Practical Advice. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  30. Imbens, G.W., & Rubin, D.B. (2015). Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jedidi, K., Mela, C.F., Gupta, S. (1999). Managing advertising and promotion for long-run profitability. Marketing Science, 18(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones, J.M., & Zufryden, F.S. (1980). Adding explanatory variables to a consumer purchase behavior model: an exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (3), 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ke, T.T., Shen, Z. -J. M., Villas-Boas, J.M. (2016). Search for information on multiple products. Management Science, 62(12), 3576–3603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kehoe, P., & Midrigan, V. (2015). Prices are sticky after all. Journal of Monetary Economics, 75, 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim, J.B., Albuquerque, P., Bronnenberg, B.J. (2010). Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Science, 29(6), 1001–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kopalle, P.K., Mela, C.F., Marsh, L. (1999). The dynamic effect of discounting on sales: Empirical analysis and normative pricing implications. Marketing Science, 18(3), 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lal, R., & Matutes, C. (1994). Retail pricing and advertising strategies. Journal of Business, 67(3), 345–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McFadden, D. (1989). A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration. Econometrica, 57(5), 995–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mela, C.F., Gupta, S., Lehmann, D.R. (1997). The long-term impact of promotion and advertising on consumer brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2), 248–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Narasimhan, C., Neslin, S.A., Sen, S.K. (1996). Promotional elasticities and category characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neslin, S.A., & Shoemaker, R.W. (1989). An alternative explanation for lower repeat rates after promotion purchases. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neslin, S.A., & Van Heerde, H.J. (2009). Promotion dynamics. Foundations and Trends in Marketing, 3(4), 177–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pollak, R.A. (1970). Habit formation and dynamic demand functions. Journal of Political Economy, 78(4, Part 1), 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Raju, J.S. (1992). The effect of price promotions on variability in product category sales. Marketing Science, 11(3), 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rubin, D.B. (1973). Matching to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics, 29, 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rubin, D.B. (1979). Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias in observational studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 318–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scott, C.A. (1976). The effects of trial and incentives on repeat purchase behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(1), 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seiler, S. (2013). The impact of search costs on consumer behavior: a dynamic approach. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 11(2), 155–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seiler, S., & Pinna, F. (2017). Estimating search benefits from Path-Tracking data: Measurement and determinants, Marketing Science, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  50. Shoemaker, R.W., & Shoaf, R.F. (1977). Repeat rates of deal purchases. Journal of Advertising Research, 17(2), 47–53.Google Scholar
  51. Shugan, S.M. (1980). The cost of thinking. Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (2), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spinnewyn, F. (1981). Rational habit formation. European Economic Review, 15(1), 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Train, K.E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tuchman, A., Nair, H., Gardete, P.M. (2017). Complementarities in consumption and the consumer demand for advertising, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  55. Villas-Boas, S.B., & Villas-Boas, J.M. (2008). Learning, forgetting, and sales. Management Science, 54(11), 1951–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vuong, Q.H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57(2), 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weitzman, M.L. (1979). Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica, 47(3), 641–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zenor, M.J., Bronnenberg, B.J., McAlister, L. (1998). The impact of marketing policy on promotional price elasticities and baseline sales. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 5(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zou, D. (2014). Intertemporal pricing of new products, Incentivizing Consumer Learning and Inertia, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  60. Zubizarreta, J.R. (2012). Using mixed integer programming for matching in an observational study of kidney failure after surgery. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107(500), 1360–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and School of ManagementDiego Portales UniversitySantiagoChile
  2. 2.Graduate School of BusinessStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.School of Business and EconomicsUniversidad de los AndesSantiagoChile
  4. 4.Center for Applied Economics, Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations