The discriminatory incentives to bundle in the cable television industry
- 607 Downloads
An influential theoretical literature supports a discriminatory explanation for product bundling: it reduces consumer heterogeneity, extracting surplus in a manner similar to second-degree price discrimination. This paper tests this theory and quantifies its importance in the cable television industry. The results provide qualified support for the theory. While bundling of general-interest cable networks is estimated to have no discriminatory effect, bundling an average top-15 special-interest cable network significantly increases the estimated elasticity of cable demand. Calibrating these results to a simple model of bundle demand with normally distributed tastes suggests that such bundling yields a heterogeneity reduction equal to a 4.7% increase in firm profits (and 4.0% reduction in consumers surplus). The results are robust to alternative explanations for bundling.
KeywordsBundling Price discrimination Cable television
JEL ClassificationL12 M31 L96 L40 L50 C31
- Angrist, J., & Krueger, A. (2001). Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments. NBER Working Paper 8456.Google Scholar
- Bresnahan, T., & Gordon, R. (1996). The economics of new goods: An introduction. In T. Bresnahan, R. Gordon (Eds.), The Economics of New Goods. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Carlton, D., & Perloff, J. (2001). Modern Industrial Organization (3rd ed.). Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar
- Crawford, G., & Cullen, J. (2007). Bundling, product choice, and efficiency: Should cable television networks be offered À La Carte? Information Economics and Policy (in press).Google Scholar
- Crawford, G., & Shum, M. (2006). Empirical modeling of endogenous quality choice: The case of cable television. Mimeo, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
- Crawford, G., & Yurukoglu, A. (2007). Demand, pricing, and bundling in subscription television markets. Mimeo, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
- Einav, L. (2007). Seasonality in the U.S. motion picture industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 38(1).Google Scholar
- FCC (2003). 2002 report on cable industry prices. Federal Communications Commission. Available at http://www.fcc.gov/mb/csrptpg.html.
- FCC (2006). Further report on the packaging and sale of video programming to the public. Federal Communications Commission, February 2006. Available at http://www.fcc.gov/mb/csrptpg.html.
- GAO (2003). Issues related to competition and subscriber rates in the cable television industry. Discussion paper, General Accounting Office, GAO-04-8.Google Scholar
- Gentile, G. (2004). ESPN ends ugly fight with Cox over fees. Associated Press.Google Scholar
- Griliches, Z., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Generics and new goods in pharmaceutical price indexes. American Economic Review, 84(5), 1213–1232.Google Scholar
- Halfon, J. (2003). The failure of cable deregulation: A blueprint for creating a competitive, proconsumer cable television marketplace. United States Public Interest Research Group.Google Scholar
- Hausman, J., Leonard, G., & Zona, D. (1994). Competitive analysis with differentiated products. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 34, 159–180.Google Scholar
- Hazlett, T., & Spitzer, M. (1997). Public Policy Towards Cable Television: The Economics of Rate Controls. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kagan World Media (1998). Economics of Basic Cable Television Networks. Discussion paper, Kagan World Media.Google Scholar
- Kagan Media Research (2005). À la Carte pricing makes great theory, but tv channel bundling tough to beat. Kagan Media Research, December 2005. Available at http://www.ncta.com/IssueBrief.aspx?contentId=15.
- Lancaster, K. (1971). Consumer Demand: A New Approach. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Mitchener, B., & Kanter, J. (2004). EU member states back record fine for microsoft. Wall Street Journal, March 24, 2004.Google Scholar
- NCTA (1998). Cable television developments. Discussion paper, National Cable Television Association, Available at http://www.ncta.com.
- Noam, E. M. (1985). Economics of scale in cable television: A multiproduct analysis. In E. M. Noam (Ed.), Video Media Competition: Regulation, Economics, and Technology. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Rennhoff, A., & Serfes, K. (2005). The role of upstream-downstream competition on bundling decisions: Should regulators force firms to unbundle? Mimeo, Drexel University.Google Scholar
- Reuters (2003). US lawmaker urges a la Carte cable channel rates. Reuters News Service.Google Scholar
- Rochet, J.-C., & Stole, L. (2000). The economics of multidimensional screening. Mimeo, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Saloner, G., Shepard, A., & Podolny, J. (2001). Strategic Management. Wiley.Google Scholar
- Schmalensee, R. (1984). Gaussian demand and commodity bundling. Journal of Business, 62, S211–S230.Google Scholar
- Squeo, A. M., & Flint, J. (2004). Should cable be a la Carte not flat rate? Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
- Stigler, G. (1963). United States v. Loew’s Inc.: A note on block booking. In P. Kurland (Ed.), The Supreme Court Review: 1963 (pp. 152–157). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Stigler, G. (1968). A note on block booking. In G. Stigler, R. D. Irwin (Eds.), The Organization of Industry.Google Scholar
- Stole, L. (2003). Price discrimination in competitive environments. Mimeo, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Thompson, A. (2006). NFL v. cable is turning into a real nailbiter. Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
- Varian, H. (2003). Intermediate Microeconomics (6th ed.). NortonGoogle Scholar
- Whinston, M. (1990). Tying, foreclosure, and exclusion. American Economic Review, 80(4), 837–859.Google Scholar
- Wildman, S., & Owen, B. (1985). Program competition, diversity, and multichannel bundling in the New Video Industry. In E. M. Noam (Ed.) Video Media Competition: Regulation, Economics, and Technology. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Xiao, P., Chan, T., & Narasimhan, C. (2006). Product bundles under three-part tariffs. Mimeo, Washington University.Google Scholar