Advertisement

Revisiting integer factorization using closed timelike curves

  • Soumik Ghosh
  • Arnab Adhikary
  • Goutam Paul
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Closed timelike curves are relativistically valid objects allowing time travel to the past. Treating them as computational objects opens the door to a wide range of results which cannot be achieved using non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Recently, research in classical and quantum computation has focused on effectively harnessing the power of these curves. In particular, Brun (Found Phys Lett 16:245–253, 2003) has shown that CTCs can be utilized to efficiently solve problems like factoring and quantified satisfiability problem. In this paper, we find a flaw in Brun’s algorithm and propose a modified algorithm to circumvent the flaw.

Keywords

Closed timelike curves D-CTC Factoring P-CTC 

References

  1. 1.
    Gödel, K.: An example of a new type of cosmological solutions of Einstein’s field equations of gravitation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 447–450 (1949)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonnor, W.B.: The rigidly rotating relativistic dust cylinder. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 13(6), 2121 (1980)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gott, J.R.: Closed timelike curves produced by pairs of moving cosmic strings: exact solutions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66(9), 1126–1129 (1991)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hartle, J.B.: Unitarity and causality in generalized quantum mechanics for nonchronal spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D 49(12), 6543–6555 (1994)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morris, M.S., Thorne, K.S., Yurtsever, U.: Wormholes, time machines, and the weak energy condition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61(13), 1446–1449 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thorne, K.S.: Closed timelike curves. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hawking, S.: The chronology protection conjecture. Phys. Rev. D 46, 603–611 (1992)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deutsch, D.: Quantum mechanics near closed timelike lines. Phys. Rev. D 44, 3197–3217 (1991)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bennett, C.: Talk at QUPON, Wien (2005). http://www.research.ibm.com/people/b/bennetc/
  10. 10.
    Lloyd, S., Maccone, L., Garcia-Patron, R., Giovannetti, V., Shikano, Y.: Closed timelike curves via post-selection: theory and experimental demonstration. Phys. Rev. D 84, 025007 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lloyd, S.: Closed timelike curves via post-selection: theory and experimental demonstration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 040403 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gisin, N.: Weinberg’s non-linear quantum mechanics and superluminal communications. Phys. Lett. A 143, 1–2 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abrams, D.S. (MIT, LNS), Lloyd, S. (MIT): Nonlinear quantum mechanics implies polynomial time solution for NP complete and #P problems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3992–3995 (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cassidy, M.J.: Nonlinearity in quantum theory and closed timelike curves. Phys. Rev. D 52, 5676–5680 (1995)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bacon, D.: Quantum computational complexity in the presence of closed timelike curves. Phys. Rev. A 70(3), 032309 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aaronson, S., Watrous, J.: Closed timelike curves make quantum and classical computing equivalent (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2008.0350
  17. 17.
    Brun, T.A., Harrington, J., Wilde, M.M.: Localized closed timelike curves can perfectly distinguish quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(21), 210402 (2009)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ahn, D., Myers, C.R., Ralph, T.C., Mann, R.B.: Quantum state cloning in the presence of a closed timelike curve. Phys. Rev. A 88, 022332 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    DeJonghe, R., Frey, K., Imbo, T.: Discontinuous quantum evolutions in the presence of closed timelike curves. Phys. Rev. D 81, 087501 (2010). arXiv:0908.2655 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pati, A.K., Chakrabarty, I., Agrawal, P.: Purification of mixed state with closed timelike curve is not possible (2010). arXiv:1003.4221
  21. 21.
    Holevo, A.S.: Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum channel. Probl. Inf. Transm. 9, 177–183 (1973)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bennett, C.H., Leung, D., Smith, G., Smolin, J.A.: Can closed timelike curves or nonlinear quantum mechanics improve quantum state discrimination or help solve hard problems? Phys. Rev. Lett. 103(17), 170502 (2009)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bennett, C.H., Leung, D., Smith, G., Smolin, J.: The impotence of nonlinearity: Why closed timelike curves and nonlinear quantum mechanics don’t improve quantum state discrimination, and haven’t been shown to dramatically speed up computation, if computation is defined in a natural, adversarial way. Rump Session Presentation at the 13th Workshop on Quantum Information Processing, Zurich (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ralph, T.C., Myers, C.R.: Information flow of quantum states interacting with closed timelike curves. Phys. Rev. A 82, 062330 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cavalcanti, E.G., Menicucci, N.C.: Verifiable nonlinear quantum evolution implies failure of density matrices to represent proper mixtures (2010). arXiv:1004.1219
  26. 26.
    Aaronson, S.: Quantum computing, postselection, and probabilistic polynomial-time. Proc. R. Soc. A 461(2063), 3473–3482 (2005)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aaronson, S., Bavarian, M., Gueltrini, G.: Computability theory of closed timelike curves (2016). arXiv:1609.05507
  28. 28.
    Ringbauer, M., Broome, M.A., Myers, C.R., White, A.G., Ralph, T.C.: Experimental simulation of closed timelike curves. Nat. Commun. 5, 4145 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brun, T.A., Wilde, M.M.: Simulations of closed timelike curves. Found. Phys. 47, 375–391 (2017)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yuan, X., Assad, S.M., Thompson, J., Haw, J.Y., Vedral, V., Ralph, T.C., Lam, P.K., Weedbrook, C., Gu, M.: Replicating the benefits of closed timelike curves without breaking causality. Npj Quantum Inf. 1, 15007 (2015). arXiv:1412.5596
  31. 31.
    Dunlap, L.: The metaphysics of D-CTCs: on the underlying assumptions of Deutsch’s quantum solution to the paradoxes of time travel. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 56, 39–47 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chakrabarty, I., Pramanik, T., Pati, A.K., Agrawal, P.: CTC assisted PR box type correlation can lead to signaling. Quantum Inf. Comput. 14(13), 1251 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kumar, A., Chakrabarty, I., Pati, A.K., De, A.S., Sen, U.: Quantum no-go theorems in causality respecting systems in presence of closed timelike curves: tweaking the Deutsch condition (2018). arXiv:1511.08560
  34. 34.
    Wallman, J.J., Bartlett, S.D.: Revisiting consistency conditions for quantum states of systems on closed timelike curves: an epistemic perspective (2010). arXiv:1005.2438
  35. 35.
    Lobo, F., Crawford, P.: Time, closed timelike curves and causality. In: Buccheri, R., Saniga, M., Stuckey, W.M. (eds.) The Nature of Time: Geometry, Physics and Perception, pp. 289–296. Springer, Dordrecht (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Korotaev, S.M., Kiktenko, E.O.: Quantum causality in closed timelike curves. Phys. Scr. 90(8), 085101 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Baumeler, Ä., Wolf, S.: Non-causal computation. Entropy 19, 326 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sami, S., Kumar, A., Chakrabarty, I., Pati, A.K., De, A.S., Sen, U.: A note on superposition of two unknown states using Deutsch CTC model. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31(29), 1650170 (2018)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pati, A.K., Chakrabarty, I., Agrawal, P.: Purification of mixed state with closed timelike curve is not possible. Phys. Rev. A 84, 062325 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bartkiewicz, M., Grudka, A., Horodecki, R., łodyga, J., Wychowaniec, J.: Closed timelike curves and the second law of thermodynamics (2017). arXiv:1711.08334
  41. 41.
    Gedik, Z.: Eigenvalue formulation of quantum mechanics near closed timelike curves (2012). arXiv:1201.4870
  42. 42.
    Moulick, S.R., Panigrahi, P.K.: Entanglement in a world with closed timelike curves (2015). arXiv:1511.00538
  43. 43.
    Jung, E., Park, D.K.: Mixedness and entanglement in the presence of localized closed timelike curves (2015). arXiv:1506.02333
  44. 44.
    Pati, A.K., Chakrabarty, I., Agrawal, P.: Quantum states, entanglement and closed timelike curves. AIP Conf. Proc. 1384, 76 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brun, T.: Computers with closed timelike curves can solve hard problems. Found. Phys. Lett. 16, 245–253 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Brun, T.A., Wilde, M.M.: Perfect state distinguishability and computational speedups with postselected closed timelike curves. Found. Phys. 42, 341 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9601-0 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Akl, S.: Time travel: a new hypercomputational paradigm. Int. J. Unconv. Comput. 6, 329–351 (2010)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Moravec, H.: Time travel and computing (1991). https://philpapers.org/rec/MORTTA-2
  49. 49.
    Aaronson, S.: NP-complete problems and physical reality. ACM SIGACT News 36(1), 30–52 (2005). arXiv:1412.5596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Allen, J.M.A.: Treating time travel quantum mechanically. Phys. Rev. A 90(4), 042107 (2014). arXiv:1401.4933 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Quantum ComputingUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.Centre for High Energy Physics, Department of PhysicsIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Cryptology and Security Research Unit, R. C. Bose Centre for Cryptology and SecurityIndian Statistical InstituteKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations