Quantum Information Processing

, Volume 15, Issue 11, pp 4563–4580 | Cite as

Squashed entanglement and approximate private states



The squashed entanglement is a fundamental entanglement measure in quantum information theory, finding application as an upper bound on the distillable secret key or distillable entanglement of a quantum state or a quantum channel. This paper simplifies proofs that the squashed entanglement is an upper bound on distillable key for finite-dimensional quantum systems and solidifies such proofs for infinite-dimensional quantum systems. More specifically, this paper establishes that the logarithm of the dimension of the key system (call it \(\log _{2}K\)) in an \(\varepsilon \)-approximate private state is bounded from above by the squashed entanglement of that state plus a term that depends only \(\varepsilon \) and \(\log _{2}K\). Importantly, the extra term does not depend on the dimension of the shield systems of the private state. The result holds for the bipartite squashed entanglement, and an extension of this result is established for two different flavors of the multipartite squashed entanglement.


Private states Distillable secret key Distillable entanglement 


  1. 1.
    Alicki, R., Fannes, M.: Continuity of quantum conditional information. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 37(5), L55–L57 (2004). arXiv:quant-ph/0312081
  2. 2.
    Avis, D., Hayden, P., Savov, I.: Distributed compression and multiparty squashed entanglement. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 41(11),115301 (2008). arXiv:0707.2792
  3. 3.
    Azuma, K.,Kato, G.: Aggregating quantum repeaters for the quantum internet (2016). arXiv:1606.00135
  4. 4.
    Azuma, K., Mizutani, A., Lo, H.-K.: Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for the quantum internet (2016). arXiv:1601.02933
  5. 5.
    Brandao, F.G.S.L., Christandl, M., Yard, J.: Faithful squashed entanglement. Commun. Math. Phys. 306(3), 805–830 (2011). arXiv:1010.1750
  6. 6.
    Christandl, M., Ekert, A., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Oppenheim, J., Renner, R.: Unifying classical and quantum key distillation. In: Proceedings of the 4th Theory of Cryptography Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4392, pp. 456–478 (2007). arXiv:quant-ph/0608199
  7. 7.
    Christandl, M.: The structure of bipartite quantum states: insights from group theory and cryptography. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge (2006). arXiv:quant-ph/0604183
  8. 8.
    Cerf, N.J., Massar, S., Schneider, S.: Multipartite classical and quantum secrecy monotones. Phys. Rev. A 66(4), 042309 (2002). arXiv:quant-ph/0202103
  9. 9.
    Christandl, M., Schuch, N., Winter, A.: Entanglement of the antisymmetric state. Commun. Math. Phys. 311(2), 397–422 (2012). arXiv:0910.4151
  10. 10.
    Christandl, M., Winter, A.: Squashed entanglement: an additive entanglement measure. J. Math. Phys. 45(3), 829–840 (2004). arXiv:quant-ph/0308088
  11. 11.
    Elliott, L.H., Ruska, M.B.: Proof of the strong subadditivity of quantum-mechanical entropy. J. Math. Phys. 14(12), 1938–1941 (1973)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fuchs, C.A., van de Graaf, J.: Cryptographic distinguishability measures for quantum mechanical states. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 45(4), 1216–1227 (1998). arXiv:quant-ph/9712042
  13. 13.
    Goodenough, K., Elkouss, D., Wehner, S.: Assessing the performance of quantum repeaters for all phase-insensitive Gaussian bosonic channels. N. J. Phys. 18(6), 063005 (2016). arXiv:1511.08710
  14. 14.
    Horodecki, P., Augusiak, R.: Quantum states representing perfectly secure bits are always distillable. Phys. Rev. A 74(1), 010302 (2006). arXiv:quant-ph/0602176
  15. 15.
    Helstrom, C.W.: Quantum detection and estimation theory. J. Stat. Phys. 1, 231–252 (1969)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, K.: Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(2), 865–942 (2009). arXiv:quant-ph/0702225v2
  17. 17.
    Horodecki, K., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Oppenheim, J: Secure key from bound entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(16), 160502 (2005). arXiv:quant-ph/0309110
  18. 18.
    Horodecki, K., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Oppenheim, J.: General paradigm for distilling classical key from quantum states. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 55(4), 1898–1929 (2009). arXiv:quant-ph/0506189
  19. 19.
    Koashi, M., Winter, A.: Monogamy of quantum entanglement and other correlations. Phys. Rev. A 69(2), 022309 (2004). arXiv:quant-ph/0310037
  20. 20.
    Lieb, E.H., Ruskai, M.B.: A fundamental property of quantum-mechanical entropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 30(10), 434–436 (1973)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Piani, M., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, R.: No-local-broadcasting theorem for multipartite quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(9), 090502 (2008). arXiv:0707.0848
  22. 22.
    Pirandola, S., Laurenza, R., Ottaviani, C., Banchi, L.: Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communications (2015). arXiv:1510.08863
  23. 23.
    Sun, T.H.: Linear dependence structure of the entropy space. Inf. Control 29(4), 337–368 (1975)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sun, T.H.: Nonnegative entropy measures of multivariate symmetric correlations. Inf. Control 36(2), 133–156 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seshadreesan, K.P., Berta, M., Wilde, M.M.: Rényi squashed entanglement, discord, and relative entropy differences. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 48(39), 395303 (2015). arXiv:1410.1443
  26. 26.
    Shirokov, M.E.: Tight continuity bounds for the quantum conditional mutual information, for the Holevo quantity and for capacities of a channel (2015). arXiv:1512.09047
  27. 27.
    Shirokov, M.E.: Squashed entanglement in infinite dimensions. J. Math. Phys. 57(3), 032203 (2016). arXiv:1507.08964
  28. 28.
    Seshadreesan, K.P., Takeoka, M., Wilde, M.M.: Bounds on entanglement distillation and secret key agreement for quantum broadcast channels. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 62(5), 2849–2866 (2016). arXiv:1503.08139
  29. 29.
    Seshadreesan, K.P., Wilde, M.M.: Fidelity of recovery, squashed entanglement, and measurement recoverability. Phys. Rev. A 92(4), 042321 (2015). arXiv:1410.1441
  30. 30.
    Takeoka, M., Guha, S., Wilde, M.M.: Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for optical quantum key distribution. Nat. Commun. 5, 5235 (2014). arXiv:1504.06390
  31. 31.
    Takeoka, M., Guha, S., Wilde, M.M.: The squashed entanglement of a quantum channel. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 60(8), 4987–4998 (2014). arXiv:1310.0129
  32. 32.
    Tomamichel, M.: Quantum Information Processing with Finite Resources—Mathematical Foundations, vol. 5 of SpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics. Springer (2016). arXiv:1504.00233
  33. 33.
    Tucci, R.R.: Quantum entanglement and conditional information transmission (1999). arXiv:quant-ph/9909041v2
  34. 34.
    Tucci, R.R.: Entanglement of distillation and conditional mutual information (2002). arXiv:quant-ph/0202144
  35. 35.
    Uhlmann, A.: The “transition probability” in the state space of a *-algebra. Rep. Math. Phys. 9(2), 273–279 (1976)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Watanabe, Satosi: Information theoretical analysis of multivariate correlation. IBM J. Res. Dev. 4(1), 66–82 (1960)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wilde, M.M.: Multipartite quantum correlations and local recoverability. Proc. R. Soc. A 471, 20140941 (2014). arXiv:1412.0333
  38. 38.
    Wilde, M.M.: From classical to quantum shannon theory (2016). arXiv:1106.1445v7
  39. 39.
    Winter, A.: Tight uniform continuity bounds for quantum entropies: conditional entropy, relative entropy distance and energy constraints (2015). arXiv:1507.07775
  40. 40.
    Wilde, M.M., Tomamichel, M., Berta, M.: Converse bounds for private communication over quantum channels (2016). arXiv:1602.08898
  41. 41.
    Yang, D., Horodecki, K., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Oppenheim, J., Song, W.: Squashed entanglement for multipartite states and entanglement measures based on the mixed convex roof. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 55(7), 3375–3387 (2009). arXiv:0704.2236
  42. 42.
    Yang, D., Horodecki, M., Wang, Z.D.: An additive and operational entanglement measure: conditional entanglement of mutual information. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(14),140501 (2008). arXiv:0804.3683

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Center for Computation and TechnologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations