Algebraic synthesis of time-optimal unitaries in SU(2) with alternating controls
- 163 Downloads
We present an algebraic framework to study the time-optimal synthesis of arbitrary unitaries in SU(2), when the control set is restricted to rotations around two non-parallel axes in the Bloch sphere. Our method bypasses commonly used control-theoretical techniques and easily imposes necessary conditions on time-optimal sequences. In a straightforward fashion, we prove that time-optimal sequences are solely parametrized by three rotation angles and derive general bounds on those angles as a function of the relative rotation speed of each control and the angle between the axes. Results are substantially different whether both clockwise and counterclockwise rotations about the given axes are allowed, or only clockwise rotations. In the first case, we prove that any finite time-optimal sequence is composed at most of five control concatenations, while for the more restrictive case, we present scaling laws on the maximum length of any finite time-optimal sequence. The bounds we find for both cases are stricter than previously published ones and severely constrain the structure of time-optimal sequences, allowing for an efficient numerical search of the time-optimal solution. Our results can be used to find the time-optimal evolution of qubit systems under the action of the considered control set and thus potentially increase the number of realizable unitaries before decoherence.
KeywordsTime-optimal control Quantum control Quantum information processing
This work was supported in part by the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research through the Young Investigator Program. C.D.A acknowledges support from Schlumberger. The authors would like to thank Seth Lloyd for discussions; exchanges with Ugo Boscain and Domenico D’Alessandro are also gratefully acknowledged.
- 6.Boscain, U., Grönberg, F., Long, R., Rabitz, H.: Time minimal trajectories for two-level quantum systems with two bounded controls. arXiv:1211.0666v1, 42 pp. (2012)
- 11.Pontryagin, L.S., Boltyanskii, V.G., Gamkrelidze, R.V., Mischenko, E.F.: The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes. Wiley, New York (1961)Google Scholar
- 18.Agrachev, A.A., Gamkrelidze, R.V.: Symplectic geometry for optimal control. In: Sussman, H.J. (ed.) Nonlinear Controllability and Optimal Control, vol. 133, pp. 263–277. M. Dekker, New York (1990)Google Scholar
- 19.Billig, Y.: Optimal attitude control with two rotation axes. arXiv:1409.3102, 22 pp. (2014)
- 23.Morton, J.J.L., Tyryshkin, A.M., Ardavan, A., Benjamin, S.C., Porfyrakis, K., Lyon, S.A., Briggs, G.A.D.: Bang–bang control of fullerene qubits using ultrafast phase gates. Nat. Phys. 2, 40–43 (2006)Google Scholar
- 24.Assémat, E., Lapert, M., Zhang, Y., Braun, M., Glaser, S.J., Sugny, D.: Simultaneous time-optimal control of the inversion of two spin-1/2 particles. Phys. Rev. A 82, 013415-1–013415-6 (2010)Google Scholar
- 25.Aiello, C.D., Cappellaro, P.: Time-optimal control by a quantum actuator. Phys. Rev. A 91, 042340-1–042340-8 (2015)Google Scholar
- 26.Burgarth, D., Maruyama, K., Murphy, M., Montangero, S., Calarco, T., Nori, F., Plenio, M.B.: Scalable quantum computation via local control of only two qubits. Phys. Rev. A 81, 040303-1–040303-4 (2010)Google Scholar
- 27.Zhang, Y., Ryan, C.A., Laflamme, R., Baugh, J.: Coherent control of two nuclear spins using the anisotropic hyperfine interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 170503-1–170503-5 (2011)Google Scholar