Advertisement

Quantum Information Processing

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 1751–1763 | Cite as

Quantum measurements on finite dimensional systems: relabeling and mixing

  • Erkka Haapasalo
  • Teiko HeinosaariEmail author
  • Juha-Pekka Pellonpää
Article

Abstract

Quantum measurements are mathematically described by positive operator valued measures (POVMs). Concentrating on finite dimensional systems, we show that one can limit to extremal rank-1 POVMs if two simple procedures of mixing and relabeling are permitted. We demonstrate that any finite outcome POVM can be obtained from extremal rank-1 POVMs with these two procedures. In particular, extremal POVMs with higher rank are just relabelings of extremal rank-1 POVMs and their structure is therefore clarified.

Keywords

Quantum measurement POVM Relabeling Mixing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D’Ariano G.M., Lo Presti P., Perinotti P.: Classical randomness in quantum measurements. J. Phys. A 38, 5979–5991 (2005)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vértesi T., Bene E.: Two-qubit Bell inequality for which positive operator-valued measurements are relevant. Phys. Rev. A 82, 062115 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hamieh S., Kobes R., Zaraket H.: Positive-operator-valued measure optimization of classical correlations. Phys. Rev. A 70, 052325 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Størmer E.: Positive linear maps of C *-algebras. In: Hartkamper, A., Neumann, H. (eds) Foundations of Quantum Mechanics and Ordered Linear Spaces, Springer, Berlin (1974)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parthasarathy K.R.: Extremal decision rules in quantum hypothesis testing. Infin. Dimens. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. Top. 2(4), 557–568 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pellonpää J.-P.: Complete characterization of extreme quantum observables in infinite dimensions. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 44, 085304 (2011)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martens H., de Muynck W.M.: Nonideal quantum measurements. Found. Phys. 20, 255–281 (1990)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buschemi F., D’Ariano G.M., Keyl M., Perinotti P., Werner R.F.: Clean positive operator valued measures. J. Math. Phys. 46, 082109 (2005)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holevo A.S.: Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1982)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Busch P., Grabowski M., Lahti P.J.: Operational Quantum Physics. Springer, Berlin (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Muynck W.M.: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, an Empiricist Approach. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davies E.B.: Quantum Theory of Open Systems. Academic Press, London (1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kelley J.L.: General Topology. Springer, New York (1975)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chiribella G., D’Ariano G.M., Schlingemann D.: How continuous quantum measurements in finite dimensions are actually discrete. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 190403 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chiribella G., D’Ariano G.M., Schlingemann D.: Barycentric decomposition of quantum measurements in finite dimensions. J. Math. Phys. 51, 022111 (2010)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erkka Haapasalo
    • 1
  • Teiko Heinosaari
    • 1
    Email author
  • Juha-Pekka Pellonpää
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and Astronomy, Turku Centre for Quantum PhysicsUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations