Entanglement of dipolar coupling spins
- 97 Downloads
- 16 Citations
Abstract
Entanglement of dipole-dipole interacting spins 1/2 is usually investigated when the energy of interaction with an external magnetic field (the Zeeman energy) is greater than the energy of dipole interactions by three orders. Under this condition only a non-equilibrium state of the spin system, realized by pulse radiofrequence irradiations, results in entanglement. The present paper deals with the opposite case: the dipolar interaction energy is the order of magnitude or even larger than the Zeeman one. It was shown that entanglement appears under the thermodynamic equilibrium conditions and the concurrence reaches the maximum when the external field is directed perpendicular to the vector connecting the nuclei. For this direction of the field and a system of two spins with the Hamiltonian accounting the realistic dipole-dipole interactions in low external magnetic field, the exact analytical expression for concurrence was also obtained. The condition of the entanglement appearance and the dependence of concurrence on the external magnetic field, temperature, and dipolar coupling constant were studied.
Keywords
Dipolar interaction Entanglement Spin systemPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Benenti, G., Casati, G., Strini, G.: Principles of Quantum Computation and Information, vol. I. World Scientific, Singapore (2004); Principles of Quantum Computation and Information, vol. II. World Scientific, Singapore (2007)Google Scholar
- 2.Amico L., Fazio R., Osterloh A., Vedral V.: Entanglement in many-body systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008)CrossRefMATHADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 3.Horodecki R., Horodecki P., Horodecki M., Horodecki K.: Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)CrossRefMATHADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bennett C.H., Brassard G., Crepeau C., Jozsa R., Peres A., Wootters W.K.: Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Chanel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993)PubMedCrossRefMATHADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 5.Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G.: Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, pp. 175–179. Bangalore, India, (1984)Google Scholar
- 6.Shor, P.: Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. In: Proceedings of 35th Annual Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 124–134. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA (1994)Google Scholar
- 7.Cappellaro P., Emerson J., Boulant N., Ramanathan C., Lloyd S., Cory D.G.: Entanglement assisted metrology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 020502 (2005)PubMedCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 8.Roos C.F., Kim K., Riebe M., Blatt R.: ‘Designer atoms’ for quantum metrology. Nature 443, 316 (2006)PubMedCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 9.Bose, S., Huelga, S.F., Jonathan, D., Knight, P.L., Murao, M., Plenio, M.B., Vedral, V.: Manipulation of entangled states for quantum information processing. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Quantum Communication, Measurement, and Computing, pp. 49–56. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 22–27 August (1998)Google Scholar
- 10.Doronin S.I., Pyrkov A.N., Fel’dman E.B.: Entanglement in alternating open chains of nuclear spins s = 1/2 with the XY Hamiltonian. JETP Lett. 85, 519 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Doronin S.I.: Multiple quantum spin dynamics of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 68, 052306 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 12.Fel’dman E.B., Pyrkov A.N.: Evolution of spin entanglement and an entanglement witness in multiple-quantum NMR experiments. JETP Lett. 88, 398 (2008)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 13.Furman G.B., Meerovich V.M., Sokolovsky V.L.: Multiple quantum NMR and entanglement dynamics in dipolar coupling spin systems. Phys. Rev. A 78, 042301 (2008)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 14.Abragam A., Goldman M.: Nuclear Magnetism: Order and Disorder. International Series of Monographs in Physics Clarendon, Oxford (1982)Google Scholar
- 15.Wootters W.K.: Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 16.Goldman M., Chapellier M., Chau V.H., Abragam A.: Principles of nuclear magnetic ordering. Phys. Rev. B 10, 226 (1974)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 17.Horodecki M., Horodecki P., Horodecki R.: Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions. Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996)CrossRefMATHADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 18.Terhal B.M.: Bell inequalities and the separability criterion. Phys. Lett. A 271, 319 (2000)CrossRefMATHADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 19.Wang X.: Thermal and ground-state entanglement in Heisenberg XX qubit rings. Phys. Rev. A 66, 034302 (2002)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 20.Wieśniak M., Vedral V., Brukner C.: Magnetic susceptibility as a macroscopic entanglement witness. New J. Phys. 7, 258 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 21.Brukner, C., Vedral, V.: Magnetic susceptibility as a macroscopic entanglement witness. e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0406040Google Scholar
- 22.Furman G.B., Meerovich V.M., Sokolovsky V.L.: Nuclear polarization and entanglement in spin systems. Quantum Inf. Process. 8, 283 (2009)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 23.Furman G.B., Meerovich V.M., Sokolovsky V.L.: Entanglement dynamics of spin systems in pure states. Phys. Rev. A 80, 032316 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 24.Furman, G.B., Meerovich, V.M., Sokolovsky, V.L.: Entanglement and multiple quantum coherence dynamics in spin clusters. Quantum Inf. Process. 8, 379 (2009)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar