Quantum Information Processing

, Volume 3, Issue 1–5, pp 295–308 | Cite as

One-Dimensional Continuous-Time Quantum Walks

  • D. ben-Avraham
  • E.M. Bollt
  • C. Tamon
Article

Abstract

We survey the equations of continuous-time quantum walks on simple one-dimensional lattices, which include the finite and infinite lines and the finite cycle, and compare them with the classical continuous-time Markov chains. The focus of our expository article is on analyzing these processes using the Laplace transform on the stochastic recurrences. The resulting time evolution equations, classical vs. quantum, are strikingly similar in form, although dissimilar in behavior. We also provide comparisons with analyses performed using spectral methods.

PACS: 03.67.Lx

Quantum walks Continuous time Laplace transform 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    A. Ambainis, Quantum walk algorithm for element distinctness, quant-ph/0311001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Aharonov, L. Davidovich, and N. Zagury, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48(2), 1687 (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (Dover, 1974).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Aharonov, A. Ambainis, J. Kempe, and U. Vazirani, Quantum Walks on Graphs, in Proceedings of 33rd ACM Annual Symposium Theory of Computing (ACM Press, 2001), pp. 50–59.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Ambainis, E. Bach, A. Nayak, A. Viswanath, and J. Watrous, One-dimensional Quantum Walks, in Proceedings of 33rd ACM Annual Symposium Theory of Computing (ACM Press, 2001), pp. 37–49.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Ahmadi, R. Belk, C. Tamon, and C. Wendler, Quantum Inform. Comput. 3(6), 611 (2003).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. L. Chung, Markov Chains with Stationary Transition Probabilities, 2nd edn. (Springer, 1967).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Childs, E. Farhi, and S. Gutmann, Quantum Inform. Process. 1, 35 (2002).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Childs, E. Deotto, R. Cleve, E. Farhi, S. Gutmann, and D. Spielman, Exponential algorithmic speedup by quantum walk, in Proceedings of 35th ACM Annual Symposium Theory of Computing (ACM Press, 2003), pp. 59–68.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Childs, and J. Goldstone, quant-ph/0306054 (2003).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Farhi, and S. Gutmann, Phys. Rev. A 58, 915 (1998).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Feynman, R. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. III (Addison-Wesley, 1965).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Gerhardt and J. Watrous, Continuous-time quantum walks on the symmetric group, in Proceedings 7th International Workshop on Randomization and Approximation Techniques in Computer Science, LNCS 2764 (Springer, 2003) pp. 290–301.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Kempe, Quantum Random walks hit exponentially faster, in Proceedings 7th International Workshop Randomization and Approximation Techniques in Computer Science, LNCS 2764 (Springer, 2003), pp. 354–369.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Meyer, J. Stat. Phys., 85, 551 (1996).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Moore and A. Russell, Quantum walks on the hypercube, in Proceedings 6th International Workshop on Randomization and Approximation Techniques in Computer Science, LNCS 2483 (Springer, 2002), pp. 164–178.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    F. Spitzer, Principles of Random Walk, 2nd edn. (Springer, 1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. ben-Avraham
    • 1
  • E.M. Bollt
    • 2
  • C. Tamon
    • 3
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsClarkson UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, and Department of PhysicsClarkson UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, and Center for Quantum Device TechnologyClarkson UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations