Public Choice

, Volume 161, Issue 3–4, pp 499–515 | Cite as

Good news and bad news: evidence of media bias in unemployment reports

Article

Abstract

This study employs information obtained from media content analyses, as well as economic and political data, to investigate negativity in unemployment news between 2001 and 2010 in Germany. The data indicate a substantial bias in terms of the amounts of negative and positive reports, compared with the actual development of unemployment. Moreover, the media tend to place negative unemployment reports more prominently than positive ones. The estimates suggest that the bias is not the consequence of journalists asymmetrically interpreting the official unemployment numbers. Instead, it is associated with the exploitation of often non-economic information and structural influences in the process of news production.

Keywords

Unemployment News media Information transmission Negativity 

JEL Classification

C31 D82 D83 H00 H40 

References

  1. Andina-Díaz, A. (2007). Reinforcement vs. change: The political influence of the media. Public Choice, 131(1/2), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behr, R. L., & Iyengar, S. (1985). Television news, real-world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(1), 38–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Besley, T., & Prat, A. (2006). Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? Media capture and government accountability. American Economic Review, 96(3), 720–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birz, G., & Lott, J. R., Jr. (2011). The effect of macroeconomic news on stock returns: New evidence from newspaper coverage. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(11), 2791–2800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bovitz, G. L., Druckman, J. N., & Lupia, A. (2002). When can a news organization lead public opinion? Ideology versus market forces in decisions to make news. Public Choice, 113(1/2), 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brosius, H.-B., & Weimann, G. (1995). Medien oder Bevölkerung: Wer bestimmt die Agenda? Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 43(3), 312–329.Google Scholar
  8. Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll, C. D. (2003). Macroeconomic expectations of households and professional forecasters. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 269–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corner, J. (1998). Television news and economic exposition. In N. T. Gavin (Ed.), The economy, media and public knowledge (pp. 53–70). London: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Curtin, R. T. (2003). Unemployment expectations: The impact of private information on income uncertainty. Review of Income and Wealth, 49(4), 539–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Die Landesmedienanstalten. (2007). Crossmediale Verflechtungen als Herausforderung für die Konzentrationskontrolle. Berlin: Vistas.Google Scholar
  13. Dua, P., & Smyth, D. J. (1993). Survey evidence on excessive public pessimism about the future behavior of unemployment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(4), 566–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Easaw, J. (2010). It’s all ‘bad’ news! Voters’ perception of macroeconomic policy competence. Public Choice, 145(1–2), 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garz, M. (2013). Unemployment expectations, excessive pessimism, and news coverage. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34(1), 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gasper, J. T. (2009). Reporting for sale: The market for news coverage. Public Choice, 141(3/4), 493–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2006). Media bias and reputation. Journal of Political Economy, 114(2), 280–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2010). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78(1), 35–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goddard, P., Corner, J., Gavin, N. T., & Richardson, K. (1998). Economic news and the dynamics of understanding: The Liverpool project. In N. T. Gavin (Ed.), The economy, media and public knowledge (pp. 9–37). London: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Goidel, R. K., & Langley, R. E. (1995). Media coverage of the economy and aggregate economic evaluations: Uncovering evidence of indirect media effects. Political Research Quarterly, 48(2), 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Groseclose, T., & Milyo, J. (2005). A measure of media bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1191–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hagen, L. M. (2005). Konjunkturnachrichten, Konjunkturklima und Konjunktur. Cologne: Herbert von Halem.Google Scholar
  23. Harrington, D. E. (1989). Economic news on television: The determinants of coverage. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(1), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lott, J. R. Jr., & Hassett, K. A. (2013). Is newspaper coverage of economic events politically biased? Discussion paper, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  25. Hester, J. B., & Gibson, R. (2003). The economy and second-level agenda setting: A time-series analysis of economic news and public opinion about the economy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hetherington, M. J. (1996). The media’s role in forming voters’ national economic evaluations in 1992. American Journal of Political Science, 40(2), 372–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kepplinger, H. M. (2000). Die Demontage der Politik in der Informationsgesellschaft. Freiburg: Alber.Google Scholar
  30. Liao, T. F. (2004). Comparing social groups: Wald statistics for testing equality among multiple logit models. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 45(1–2), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacKuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S., & Stimson, J. A. (1992). Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the U.S. economy. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manning, P. (2001). News and news sources: A critical introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Mullainathan, S., & Shleifer, A. (2005). The market for news. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1031–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mutz, D. C. (1992). Mass media and the depoliticization of personal experience. American Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 483–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nadeau, R., Niemi, R. G., Fan, D. P., & Amato, T. (1999). Elite economic forecasts, economic news, mass economic judgments, and presidential approval. Journal of Politics, 61(1), 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neuman, W. R. (1990). The threshold of public attention. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54(2), 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Patterson, T. E., & Donsbach, W. (1996). News decisions: Journalists as partisan actors. Political Communication, 13(4), 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schultz, J. (1998). Reviving the Fourth Estate: Democracy, accountability and the media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soroka, S. N. (2006). Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 372–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tortorice, D. L. (2012). Unemployment expectations and the business cycle. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 12(1), 1–47.Google Scholar
  43. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Urban, C. D. (1999). Examining our credibility: Examining credibility, explaining ourselves. Reston: American Association of Newspaper Editors.Google Scholar
  45. Williams, R. (2009). Using heterogeneous choice models to compare logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods & Research, 37(4), 531–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hamburg Media SchoolHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations